Cited by 473School Choice and PerformancePolitics, Economics, and Education PolicyLocal Government Finance and Decentralization

School finance reform, the distribution of school spending, and the distribution of student test scores

Card, David, Payne, A.Abigail·2002·Journal of Public Economics

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0047-2727(00)00177-8

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Card, D., & Payne, A. A.
Affiliations
  • University of California, Berkeley (US)
  • University of Illinois Chicago (US)
Corresponding author
Card, David
Venue
Journal of Public Economics
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2002-01
Volume
83
Issue
1
Pages
49-82
ISSN
0047-2727 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2150732543
Cited by
473
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 16 · 2022: 24 · 2021: 28 · 2020: 26 · 2019: 31 · 2018: 22 · 2017: 26 · 2016: 65 · 2015: 15 · 2014: 25 · 2013: 15 · 2012: 13
FWCI
67.01
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Public Economics (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Education › School Choice and Performance
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Politics, Economics, and Education Policy
  • Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Local Government Finance and Decentralization
Keywords
school finance reform, school district funding, state aid, SAT scores, academic performance, family background, achievement gap, education funding

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review