Computer-Supported Cooperative Work and Groupware
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Computer-based communication technology, such as electronic mail and conference systems, is the most successful category of CSCW application to date.
“This explains that computer-based communication technology - such as electronic mail and conference systems - is the most successful category of CSCW application to date [11].”
From Designing for the dynamics of cooperative work activities (1998) · cites this paper as [11]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
The interdisciplinary study of coordination
Malone, T. W., & Crowston, K. (1994) · ACM Computing Surveys · doi:10.1145/174666.174668 · Cited by 3,504 · see citing works
Workflow From Within and Without: Technology and Cooperative Work on the Print Industry Shopfloor
Bowers, J., Button, G., & Sharrock, W. (1995) · Proceedings of the Fourth European Conference on Computer-Supported Cooperative Work ECSCW ’95 · doi:10.1007/978-94-011-0349-7_4 · Cited by 352 · see citing works
Identifying potential CSCW applications by means of activity theory concepts: a case example
Kuutti, K., & Arvonen, T. (1992) · Proceedings of the 1992 ACM conference on Computer-supported cooperative work - CSCW '92 · doi:10.1145/143457.150955 · Cited by 120 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Designing for the dynamics of cooperative work activities
Bardram, J. (1998) · Proceedings of the 1998 ACM conference on Computer supported cooperative work · doi:10.1145/289444.289483 · Cited by 188 · see citing works
Robots in Groups and Teams: A Literature Review
Sebo, S., Stoll, B., Scassellati, B., & Jung, M. F. (2020) · Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction · doi:10.1145/3415247 · Cited by 158 · see citing works
- Authors
- Grudin, J., & Poltrock, S. E.
- Affiliations
- University of California, Irvine (US)
- Boeing (United States) (US)
- ORCID
- Grudin, Jonathan
- Venue
- Advances in Computers
- Publisher
- Elsevier
- Published
- 1997
- Pages
- 269-320
- ISSN
- 0065-2458 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1546145059
- Cited by
- 70
- References
- 3
- Citations by year
- 2025: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 4 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2017: 5 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 3
- FWCI
- 12.66
- Type
- book chapter
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Advances in computers (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Team Dynamics and Performance
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Information Systems Theories and Implementation
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Human-Computer Interaction › Usability and User Interface Design
- Keywords
- computer-supported cooperative work, groupware, multidisciplinary research, shared information space, work coordination, behavioral problems, future trends
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
