Cited by 454Motivation and Self-Concept in SportsGrit, Self-Efficacy, and MotivationRecreation, Leisure, Wilderness Management

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 169 of the 173 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

On Passion for Life Activities

Vallerand, Robert J.·2010·Advances in Experimental Social Psychology

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0065-2601(10)42003-1

Cites

169 of 169 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 173 references

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 301–400 of 452

Metadata

Authors
Vallerand, R. J.
Affiliations
Université du Québec à Montréal (CA)
Corresponding author
Vallerand, Robert J.
Venue
Advances in Experimental Social Psychology
Publisher
Elsevier
Published
2010
Pages
97-193
ISSN
0065-2601 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2748324448
Cited by
454
References
173
Citations by year
2026: 28 · 2025: 40 · 2024: 35 · 2023: 40 · 2022: 47 · 2021: 38 · 2020: 30 · 2019: 33 · 2018: 28 · 2017: 28 · 2016: 24 · 2015: 18 · 2014: 17 · 2013: 17 · 2012: 17
FWCI
52.95
Type
book chapter
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Advances in experimental social psychology (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Motivation and Self-Concept in Sports
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Grit, Self-Efficacy, and Motivation
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Tourism, Leisure and Hospitality Management › Recreation, Leisure, Wilderness Management
Keywords
dualistic model of passion, harmonious passion, obsessive passion, psychological well-being, performance, interpersonal effects, social consequences

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review