The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Types of Polyploids: Their Classification and Significance
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Whole-genome duplication can arise through autopolyploidization or allopolyploidization, with different consequences on subsequent genome evolution.
“WGD can arise through two mechanisms: autopolyploidization (within or between populations of a single species) or allopolyploidization (after hybridization of related species), with different consequences on subsequent genome evolution (Stebbins 1947; Mason and Wendel 2020).”
From An atlas of fish genome evolution reveals delayed rediploidization following the teleost whole-genome duplication (2022) · cites this paper as Stebbins 1947
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 99
- Anderson, 1936, Ann. Mo. bot. Gdn., 23, 457, 10.2307/2394164 · DOI
- Anderson, 1938, Amer. J. Bot., 25, 396, 10.1002/j.1537-2197.1938.tb09237.x · DOI
- Anderson, 1936, Bot. Gaz., 97, 433, 10.1086/334582 · DOI
- Asana, 1945, Curr. Sci., 14, 74
- Avdulov, 1931, Bull. appl. Bot. Leningrad Supp., 44
- Baldwin, 1941, J. Hered., 32, 249, 10.1093/oxfordjournals.jhered.a105053 · DOI
- Barthelmess, 1941, Z. indukt. Abstamm.- u. VererbLehre, 79, 153
- Beasley, 1940, J. Hered., 31, 39, 10.1093/oxfordjournals.jhered.a104794 · DOI
- Beasley, 1942, Genetics, 27, 25, 10.1093/genetics/27.1.25 · DOI
- Bergner, 1944, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci., Wash., 30, 302, 10.1073/pnas.30.10.302 · DOI
- Blackburn, 1938, J. Bot., 76, 306
- Bowden, 1945, Amer. J. Bot., 32, 81, 10.1002/j.1537-2197.1945.tb05090.x · DOI
- Bradley, 1943, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci., Wash., 29, 295, 10.1073/pnas.29.10.295 · DOI
- Brown, 1943, Amer. J. Bot., 30, 686, 10.1002/j.1537-2197.1943.tb10319.x · DOI
- Calder, 1937, J. Bot. linn. Soc., 51, 1, 10.1111/j.1095-8339.1937.tb01900.x · DOI
- Camp, 1944, Bull. Torrey bot. Club, 71, 426, 10.2307/2481315 · DOI
- Clausen, 1933, Hereditas, Lund, 10, 65
- Clausen, 1940, Publ. Carnegie Instn. No. 520, 432
- Clausen, 1945, Publ. Carnegie Instn. No. 564, 174
- Clausen, 1941, Amer. Nat., 75, 291, 10.1086/280965 · DOI
- Clausen, 1944, Genetics, 29, 447, 10.1093/genetics/29.5.447 · DOI
- Emsweller, 1941, Amer. Nat., 75, 310, 10.1086/280967 · DOI
- Fagerlind, 1937, Acta Hort. berg., 11, 195
- Fagerlind, 1941, Chron. Bot., 6, 251
- Fagerlind, 1941, Chron. Bot., 6, 320
- Giles, 1941, Bull. Torrey bot. Club, 68, 207, 10.2307/2481499 · DOI
- Giles, 1942, Amer. J. Bot., 29, 637, 10.1002/j.1537-2197.1942.tb10259.x · DOI
- Goodspeed, 1944, Proc. Calif. Acad. Sci., 25, 291
- Goodspeed, 1942, Bot. Rev., 8, 271, 10.1007/BF02882226 · DOI
- Greenleaf, 1941, Genetics, 26, 301, 10.1093/genetics/26.3.301 · DOI
- Greenleaf, 1942, J. Genet., 43, 69, 10.1007/BF02982747 · DOI
- Gustafsson, 1943, Acta Univ. Lund, K. fysiogr. Sälsk., N.F., 54, 200
- Hagerup, 1932, Hereditas, Lund, 16, 19, 10.1111/j.1601-5223.1932.tb02560.x · DOI
- Hagerup, 1933, Hereditas, Lund, 18, 122, 10.1111/j.1601-5223.1933.tb02604.x · DOI
- Hagerup, 1940, Hereditas, Lund, 26, 399, 10.1111/j.1601-5223.1940.tb03244.x · DOI
- Howard, 1938, J. Genet., 36, 239, 10.1007/BF02982418 · DOI
- Howard, 1940, Nature, Lond., 146, 303, 10.1038/146303b0 · DOI
- Huskins, 1941, Amer. Nat., 75, 329, 10.1086/280968 · DOI
- Jones, 1942, J. Hered., 33, 25, 10.1093/oxfordjournals.jhered.a105086 · DOI
- Kihara, 1940, Züchter, 12, 49, 10.1007/BF01812302 · DOI
- Kostoff, 1938, J. Genet., 37, 129, 10.1007/BF02982147 · DOI
- Kostoff, 1939, Nature, Lond., 144, 868, 10.1038/144868b0 · DOI
- Kostoff, 1939, Biodynamica, 14
- Kostoff, 1939, Genetica, 21, 285, 10.1007/BF01508121 · DOI
- Kostoff, 1940, J. Hered., 31, 33, 10.1093/oxfordjournals.jhered.a104790 · DOI
- Lamm, 1945, Hereditas, Lund, 31, 1, 10.1111/j.1601-5223.1945.tb02750.x · DOI
- Lawrence, 1930, Genetics, 12, 269
- Lesley, 1943, J. Hered., 34, 199, 10.1093/oxfordjournals.jhered.a105284 · DOI
- Levan, 1937, Hereditas, Lund, 23, 317, 10.1111/j.1601-5223.1937.tb02671.x · DOI
- Levan, 1941, Hereditas, Lund, 27, 243, 10.1111/j.1601-5223.1941.tb03259.x · DOI
- Lilienfeld, 1936, Jap. J. Bot., 8, 119
- Lindstrom, 1941, Genetics, 26, 387, 10.1093/genetics/26.4.387 · DOI
- Ljungdahl, 1924, Svensk bot. Tidskr., 18, 279
- Love, 1945, Amer. J. Bot., 32, 451, 10.1002/j.1537-2197.1945.tb05144.x · DOI
- Mangelsdorf, 1939, Bull. Texas agric. Exp. Sta. No. 574, 315
- Manton, 1935, Z. indukt. Abstamm.- u. VererbLehre, 69, 132
- Manton, 1937, Ann. Bot., Lond. N.S., 1, 439, 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aob.a083479 · DOI
- Mützing, 1932, Hereditas, Lund, 16, 105, 10.1111/j.1601-5223.1932.tb02564.x · DOI
- Müntzing, 1936, Hereditas, Lund, 21, 263
- Müntzing, 1937, Hereditas, Lund, 23, 113, 10.1111/j.1601-5223.1937.tb02665.x · DOI
- Müntzing, 1938, Hereditas, Lund, 24, 117, 10.1111/j.1601-5223.1938.tb03212.x · DOI
- Müntzing, 1939, Hereditas, Lund, 25, 387, 10.1111/j.1601-5223.1939.tb02704.x · DOI
- Myers, 1943, Bot. Gaz., 104, 541, 10.1086/335168 · DOI
- Myers, 1944, J. agric. Res., 68, 21
- Myers, 1945, Bot. Gaz., 106, 304, 10.1086/335300 · DOI
- Myers, 1942, Bot. Gaz., 104, 171, 10.1086/335119 · DOI
- Navashin (Nawaschin), 1927, Z. Zellforsch., 6, 195, 10.1007/BF02583436 · DOI
- Nordenskiöld, 1941, Bot. Notiser, 12
- Paddock, 1942, Ohio J. Sci., 42, 147
- Pantulu, 1942, Curr. Sci., 11, 152
- Pirschle, 1942, Z. indukt. Abstamm-. u. VererbLehre, 80, 247
- Pirschle, 1942, Z. indukt. Abstamm-. u. VererbLehre, 80, 126
- Randolph, 1941, Amer. Nat., 75, 347, 10.1086/280969 · DOI
- Sansome, 1932, Recent Adv. Plant Genet., 414
- Sears, 1941, Res. Bull. Mo. agric. Exp. Sta. No. 337, 20
- Sears, 1944, Genetics, 29, 232, 10.1093/genetics/29.3.232 · DOI
- Senn, 1938, Bibliogr. genet., 12, 175
- Sharp, 1943, Fundamentals of Cytology., 270
- Simonet, 1935, Bull. Biol., 69, 178
- Skirm, 1942, Genetics, 27, 635, 10.1093/genetics/27.6.635 · DOI
- Sparrow, 1942, Amer. J. Bot., 29, 711, 10.1002/j.1537-2197.1942.tb10271.x · DOI
- Stebbins, 1938, Amer. J. Bot., 25, 189, 10.1002/j.1537-2197.1938.tb09203.x · DOI
- Stebbins, 1940, Amer. Nat., 74, 54, 10.1086/280872 · DOI
- Stebbins, 1941, Amer. J. Bot., 28
- Stebbins, 1942, Amer. Nat., 76, 36, 10.1086/281012 · DOI
- Stebbins, 1945, Bot. Rev., 11, 463, 10.1007/BF02861140 · DOI
- Stebbins, 1941, Amer. J. Bot., 28, 371, 10.1002/j.1537-2197.1941.tb07983.x · DOI
- Stebbins, 1944, Proc. Calif. Acad. Sci., 25, 307
- Stephens, 1942, J. Genet., 44, 272, 10.1007/BF02982832 · DOI
- Stewart, 1943, Amer. J. Bot., 30, 1, 10.1002/j.1537-2197.1943.tb14722.x · DOI
- Thomas, 1940, J. Genet., 40, 119, 10.1007/BF02982485 · DOI
- Thomas, 1940, J. Genet., 40, 141, 10.1007/BF02982487 · DOI
- Upcott, 1936, J. Genet., 33, 135, 10.1007/BF03027607 · DOI
- Upcott, 1939, J. Genet., 39, 79, 10.1007/BF02982820 · DOI
- Waddington, 1939, An Introduction to Modern Genetics, 441
- Wakar (Vakar), 1935, Züchter, 7, 199, 10.1007/BF01812058 · DOI
- Zhebrak, 1944, Nature, 153, 549, 10.1038/153549a0 · DOI
- Zhebrak, 1944, Acts Timiriazev agric. Acad. (Genet. div.), 6, 5
- Zhebrak, 1946, Amer. Nat., 80, 271, 10.1086/281431 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Autopolyploidy in angiosperms: Have we grossly underestimated the number of species?
(2007) · Taxon · doi:10.2307/25065732 · Cited by 452
Bock, D. G., Cai, Z., Elphinstone, C., González-Segovia, E., Hirabayashi, K., Huang, K., Keais, G. L., Kim, A., Owens, G. L., & Rieseberg, L. H. (2023) · Plant Communications · doi:10.1016/j.xplc.2023.100599 · Cited by 84
“For example, hybrid polyploids (allopolyploids) were traditionally considered to be more frequent than non-hybrid polyploids (autopolyploids; Clausen et al., 1945; Stebbins, 1947), which are often morphologically cryptic.”
Parey, E., Louis, A., Montfort, J., Guiguen, Y., Crollius, H. R., & Berthelot, C. (2022) · Genome Research · doi:10.1101/gr.276953.122 · Cited by 83
Metadata
- Authors
- Stebbins, G. L.
- Venue
- Advances in Genetics
- Publisher
- Elsevier
- Published
- 1947
- Pages
- 403-429
- ISSN
- 0065-2660
- Cited by
- 502
- References
- 0
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review