The DOI matches its Crossref record; 135 of the 136 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Acoustic Signals and Speciation: The Roles of Natural and Sexual Selection in the Evolution of Cryptic Species
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“For the first time, researchers could systematically study cryptic, nocturnal, and rare species”
From Listening forward: emerging roles of bioacoustics in ecology, evolution, and conservation (2026) · cites this paper as Jones 1997
Citations
Cites
Mayr, E. (1963) · doi:10.4159/harvard.9780674865327 · Cited by 10,175
Molecular Markers, Natural History and Evolution
Avise, J. C. (1994) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-1-4615-2381-9 · Cited by 5,210
PAUP (phylogenetic analysis using parsimony)
(2008) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-1-4020-6754-9_12413 · Cited by 4,424
Wilson, E. O. (1992) · DigitalGeorgetown (Georgetown University Library) · Cited by 2,468
Models of speciation by sexual selection on polygenic traits
Lande, R. (1981) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.78.6.3721 · Cited by 2,187
Bird song: biological themes and variations
(1996) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.33-2735 · Cited by 2,170
Signals, Signal Conditions, and the Direction of Evolution
Endler, J. A. (1992) · The American Naturalist · doi:10.1086/285308 · Cited by 1,960
Norberg, U. M. L., & Rayner, J. M. V. (1987) · Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · doi:10.1098/rstb.1987.0030 · Cited by 1,837
Sexual Selection, Social Competition, and Speciation
West‐Eberhard, M. J. (1983) · The Quarterly Review of Biology · doi:10.1086/413215 · Cited by 1,698
Ecological Sources of Selection on Avian Sounds
Morton, E. S. (1975) · The American Naturalist · doi:10.1086/282971 · Cited by 1,665
Research works printed but not linked: 9
- Baagøe, 1973, Taxonomy of two sibling species of bats in Scandinavia Myotis mystacinus and Myotis brandtii (Chiroptera), Vidensk. Meddr dansk naturh. Foren., 136, 191
- Barlow, K. E., and Jones, G. (in press, c). Function of Pipistrellus pipistrellus (Chiroptera) social calls: Field data and a playback experiment. Anim. Behav.
- Elepfandt, 1996, Sensory perception and the lateral line system in the clawed frog, Xenopus. Symp. Zool. Soc. Lond., 68, 97
- Gerell-Lundberg, 1994, The mating behaviour of the pipistrelle and the Nathusius’ pipistrelle (Chiroptera)—A comparison, Folia Zool., 43, 315
- Jones, 1995, Variation in bat echolocation: Implications for resource partitioning and communication, Le Rhinolophe, 11, 53
- Lanza, 1960, Su du specie criptiche di orrechione: Plecotus auritus (L.) e P. wardi Thomas (Mammalia: Chiroptera), Monitore Zoologico Italiano, 68, 7
- LaVal, 1973, A revision of the Neotropical bats of the genus Myotis, Science Bulletin Natural History Museum Los Angeles County, 15, 1
- Nemeth, 1994, The phytogeny of the Myotis mystacinus group—a molecular approach, Bat Research News, 35, 37
- Weid, 1987, Ortungsrufe europäischer Fledermäuse beim Jagflug im Freiland, Myotis, 25, 5
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Evolutionary divergence in acoustic signals: causes and consequences
Wilkins, M. R., Nathalie Seddon, A., & Safran, R. J. (2012) · Trends in Ecology & Evolution · doi:10.1016/j.tree.2012.10.002 · Cited by 507
Yoder, A. D., & Yang, Z. (2004) · Molecular Ecology · doi:10.1046/j.1365-294x.2004.02106.x · Cited by 313
“Furthermore, these correlations may ultimately provide a powerful explanatory framework for determining why mouse lemur species are ‘cryptic’, sensu Jones (1997).”
BackgroundInfluentialCryptic diversity in European bats
Mayer, F., & von Helversen, O. (2001) · Proceedings of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rspb.2001.1744 · Cited by 257
“Detailed studies on morphology, ecology, echolocation (reviewed by Jones 1997) and gene £ow are required in order to resolve the species status in such cases.”
BackgroundSONG VARIATION IN AN AVIAN RING SPECIES
Irwin, D. E. (2000) · Evolution · doi:10.1111/j.0014-3820.2000.tb00099.x · Cited by 242
“Among closely related species, mating signals are often more divergent than morphological, genetic, or other behavioral traits (Miller 1996; Jones 1997; Wells and Henry 1998; Irwin et al. 2001).”
BackgroundRazgour, O., Clare, E. L., Zeale, M. R. K., Hanmer, J., Schnell, I. B., Rasmussen, M. A., Gilbert, M. T. P., & Jones, G. (2011) · Ecology and Evolution · doi:10.1002/ece3.49 · Cited by 213
“For example, partitioning of foraging habitat, in the absence of apparent differences in wing morphology (Jones 1997), was identified among the recently separated cryptic Pipistrellus species, whereby P. pygmaeus selects riparian habitats, while P. pipistrellus prefers a wide range of habitats…”
Self-citationSattler, T. L., Bontadina, F., Hirzel, A. H., & Arlettaz, R. (2007) · Journal of Applied Ecology · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2664.2007.01328.x · Cited by 194
“…pipistrelles (45 kHz vs. 55 kHz) had been recorded previously within this species complex (Zingg 1990), but it is only through refined ecological and genetic research that the existence of a second species, P. pygmaeus (Leach 1825), could be proved (Barlow 1997; Barlow & Jones 1997; Barratt et al .”
BackgroundInfluentialEavesdropping on the echolocation and social calls of bats
Fenton, M. B. (2003) · Mammal Review · doi:10.1046/j.1365-2907.2003.00019.x · Cited by 188
Arlettaz, R. (1999) · Journal of Animal Ecology · doi:10.1046/j.1365-2656.1999.00293.x · Cited by 187
Irwin, D. E., THIMGAN, M. P., & Irwin, J. H. (2008) · Journal of Evolutionary Biology · doi:10.1111/j.1420-9101.2007.01499.x · Cited by 168
“Closely related species often differ dramatically in the signals that they use to communicate, and these differences might play a central role in causing reproductive isolation (West-Eberhard, 1983; Henry, 1985; Jones, 1997; Slabbekoorn & Smith, 2002a; Mendelson & Shaw, 2005; Price, 2008).”
BackgroundDavidson-Watts, I., Walls, S. S., & Jones, G. (2006) · Biological Conservation · doi:10.1016/j.biocon.2006.05.027 · Cited by 162
Self-citationFlycatcher song in allopatry and sympatry – convergence, divergence and reinforcement
Haavie, J., Borge, T., Bureš, S., Garamszegi, L. Z., Lampe, H. M., Moreno, J., Qvarnström, A., Török, J., & Sætre, G. (2004) · Journal of Evolutionary Biology · doi:10.1111/j.1420-9101.2003.00682.x · Cited by 151
“Natural selection, such as adaptation to a different acoustical environment, sexual selection or random changes may cause population differences in song (West-Eberhard, 1983; Andersson, 1994; Butlin, 1995; Jones, 1997; Price, 1999).”
BackgroundNicholls, B., & Racey, P. A. (2006) · Ecography · doi:10.1111/j.2006.0906-7590.04575.x · Cited by 149
Hulva, P., Horáček, I., Strelkov, P., & Benda, P. (2004) · Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution · doi:10.1016/j.ympev.2004.04.007 · Cited by 132
“The scenario of sympatric speciation, further discussed by Barrat et al. (1997) and Jones (1997) , predicts that a bimodality of echolocation calls would result from the character displacement within an ancestral population and that just this was the first step in the speciation story.”
BackgroundAcoustic interference and recognition space within a complex assemblage of dendrobatid frogs
Amézquita, A., Flechas, S. V., LIMA, A. P., Gasser, H., & Hödl, W. (2011) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1104773108 · Cited by 131
“M signals mediate successful breeding and, therefore, are often affected by strong selective forces that may lead to adaptation and reproductive isolation (1, 2).”
BackgroundAcoustic divergence in two cryptic Hipposideros species: a role for social selection?
Kingston, T., Lara, M., Jones, G., Zubaid, A., Kunz, T., & Schneider, C. J. (2001) · Proceedings of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rspb.2001.1630 · Cited by 129
“Central to the acoustic resource partitioning hypothesis is the relationship between call frequency and the size of prey that can be detected (Barclay 1986; Barclay & Brigham 1991; Jones 1997).”
BackgroundResultInfluentialSelf-citationRusso, D., Ancillotto, L., & Jones, G. (2017) · Canadian Journal of Zoology · doi:10.1139/cjz-2017-0089 · Cited by 127
Self-citationAcoustic divergence in the communication of cryptic species of nocturnal primates (Microcebus ssp.)
Braune, P., Schmidt, S., & Zimmermann, E. (2008) · BMC Biology · doi:10.1186/1741-7007-6-19 · Cited by 119
“In contrast, species-specific recognition of advertisement calls plays an important role for reproduction in cryptic and dispersed living species where females and males have to find each other for courtship and mating [12].”
Henry, C. S., Brooks, S. J., Duelli, P., & Johnson, J. B. ‘. (2002) · Annals of the Entomological Society of America · doi:10.1603/0013-8746(2002)095[0172:dttcci]2.0.co;2 · Cited by 119
“…special skills or sophisticated techniques to uncover or assess (for recent examples from diverse groups, see Paterson 1991, Sweeney and Funk 1991, Vrijenhoek et al. 1994, Bernardi and Goswami 1997, Green et al. 1997, Jones 1997, Wilcox et al. 1997, Jackson and Resh 1998, Baric andSturmbauer 1999).”
BackgroundAssortative Mating in Hybrid Zones Is Remarkably Ineffective in Promoting Speciation
Irwin, D. E. (2020) · The American Naturalist · doi:10.1086/708529 · Cited by 114
“…that assortative mating is important early in speciation appears to result from two patterns in nature: First, traits involved in mate choice and other social dynamics are often the most noticeably divergent traits between populations (e.g., Jones 1997; Irwin et al. 2001; Masta and Maddison 2002).”
BackgroundCryptic species conservation: a review
Hending, D. (2025) · Biological Reviews · doi:10.1111/brv.13139 · Cited by 113
Amézquita, A., Hödl, W., Lima, A., Castellanos, L., Erdtmann, L., & de Araújo, M. C. (2006) · Evolution; international journal of organic evolution · doi:10.1111/j.0014-3820.2006.tb00531.x · Cited by 117
Thabah, A., Rossiter, S. J., Kingston, T., Zhang, S. Y., Parsons, S. E., Mya, K. M., Zubaid, A., & Jones, G. (2006) · Biological Journal of the Linnean Society · doi:10.1111/j.1095-8312.2006.00602.x · Cited by 111
“In recent years, the identification of increasing numbers of cryptic species of bats has led to the assertion that the number of bat species currently described might be a substantial underestimate of bat diversity (Jones, 1997; Jones & Barlow, 2004).”
Self-citationCryptic species in the genus Phylloscopus (Old World leaf warblers)
Irwin, D. E., Alström, P., Olsson, U., & Benowitz‐Fredericks, Z. M. (2001) · Ibis · doi:10.1111/j.1474-919x.2001.tb04479.x · Cited by 100
Dool, S. E., Puechmaille, S. J., Foley, N. M., Allegrini, B., Bastian, A., Mutumi, G. L., Maluleke, T. G., Odendaal, L. J., Teeling, E. C., & Jacobs, D. S. (2016) · Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution · doi:10.1016/j.ympev.2016.01.003 · Cited by 92
Guillén, Javier Juste, B., & Ibáñez (1999) · Journal of Evolutionary Biology · doi:10.1046/j.1420-9101.2000.00155.x · Cited by 88
“…understanding of this narrow analysis sonar system, although the reason for using such high frequencies remains unclear (Fenton & Fullard, 1979; Fullard, 1987; Schnitzler, 1987; Vater, 1987; Heller & Helversen, 1989; Neuweiler, 1989, 1990a; RuÈ bsamen & SchaÈfer, 1990a,b; Jones, 1995, 1996, 1997).”
BackgroundInfluentialA multidimensional approach for detecting species patterns in Malagasy vertebrates
Yoder, A. D., Olson, L. E., Hanley, C. D., Heckman, K. L., Rasoloarison, R. M., Russell, A., Ranivo, J., Soarimalala, V., Karanth, K. P., Raselimanana, A. P., et al. (2005) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0502092102 · Cited by 86
Clare, E. L., Adams, A. M., Maya-Simões, A. Z., Eger, J. L., Hebert, P. D. N., & Fenton, M. B. (2013) · BMC Evolutionary Biology · doi:10.1186/1471-2148-13-26 · Cited by 85
“nocturnal and active high in the air) makes them difficult to study in the wild [21].”
BackgroundPuechmaille, S. J., Borissov, I. M., Zsebők, S., Allegrini, B., Hizem, M., Küenzel, S., Schuchmann, M., Teeling, E. C., & Siemers, B. M. (2014) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0103452 · Cited by 74
“Our study only tested sexual selection on echolocation calls as previously suggested [15–17,63,64] but given the rich repertoire of social calls in bats (e.”
ResultGalimberti, A., Spada, M., Russo, D., Mucedda, M., Agnelli, P., Crottini, A., Ferri, E., Martinoli, A., & Casiraghi, M. (2012) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0040122 · Cited by 71
“Nowadays, Italy is home to 34 bat species [30–33] but, as a general condition for this group of mammals, many taxa are nearly or completely indistinguishable morphologically, acoustically or biometrically [11,34–37].”
Sympatric distribution of two cryptic bat species across Europe
MAYER, F., & von Helversen, O. (2001) · Biological Journal of the Linnean Society · doi:10.1006/bijl.2001.0586 · Cited by 70
Jones, G., & Barratt, E. M. (1999) · The Bulletin of zoological nomenclature · doi:10.5962/bhl.part.23065 · Cited by 70
Self-citationAssessing niche partitioning of co‐occurring sibling bat species by DNA metabarcoding
Arrizabalaga‐Escudero, A., Clare, E. L., Salsamendi, E., Alberdi, A., Garin, I., Aihartza, J., & Goiti, U. (2018) · Molecular Ecology · doi:10.1111/mec.14508 · Cited by 65
“Call frequency can dictate the size of detected prey (acoustic resource partitioning hypothesis; Barclay & Brigham, 1991; Jones, 1997) as well as the foraging habitat (Kingston et al.”
BackgroundLack of Premating Isolation at the Base of a Phylogenetic Tree
Grant, B. R., & Grant, P. R. (2002) · The American Naturalist · doi:10.1086/339987 · Cited by 60
“…populations is not unusual, having been revealed in other recent studies where molecular work has uncovered many cryptic species, for example, in bats (Jones and van Parijs 1993; Jones 1997), fish (Colborn et al. 2001), corals (van Oppen et al. 2001), and copepods (Rocha-Olivares et al. 2001).”
ResultMolecular phylogeny of hipposiderid bats from Southeast Asia and evidence of cryptic diversity
Murray, S. W., Polly Campbell, A., Kingston, T., Zubaid, A., Francis, C. M., & Kunz, T. (2011) · Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution · doi:10.1016/j.ympev.2011.10.021 · Cited by 59
“Cryptic diversity is predicted to be relatively common in bats, especially in Hipposideridae and Rhinolophidae, which have highly specialized echolocation systems that potentially constrain social communication (Jones, 1997).”
Henry, C. S., & Wells, M. L. M. (2004) · Animal Behaviour · doi:10.1016/j.anbehav.2003.10.032 · Cited by 57
IDENTIFYING BATS FROM TIME-EXPANDED RECORDINGS OF SEARCH CALLS: COMPARING CLASSIFICATION METHODS
Preatoni, D. G., Nodari, M., Chirichella, R., Tosi, G., Wauters, L. A., & Martinoli, A. (2005) · Journal of Wildlife Management · doi:10.2193/0022-541x(2005)69[1601:ibftro]2.0.co;2 · Cited by 55
“Bats are often difficult to catch, and species identification of a captured bat may not be easy, especially for cryptic species (Jones 1997, Jones and Barratt 1999, Wicht et al. 2003).”
BackgroundCalahorra‐Oliart, A., Ospina‐Garcés, S. M., & León‐Paniagua, L. (2020) · Journal of Mammalogy · doi:10.1093/jmammal/gyaa116 · Cited by 60
“Morphologically cryptic species complexes are common among all mammal groups, and bats are particularly prone to this kind of misclassification given their small size, elusive habits, morphological convergences, and subtle differences (Jones 1997; Mayer and von Helversen 2001; Clare et al.”
Background(PPR), E. P. O. P. P. P. A. T. R., Hernández, A. F., Adriaanse, P., Aldrich, A., Berny, P. J., Čoja, T., Duquesne, S., Gimsing, A. L., Marina, M., Millet, M., et al. (2019) · EFSA Journal · doi:10.2903/j.efsa.2019.5758 · Cited by 55
“In some species, a ‘lek’ system exists, with males advertising themselves by calling from the roost (Nyctalus noctula: Sluiter and Van Heerdt, 1964) or performing songflights (Pipistrellus pipistrellus and Pipistrellus pygmaeus: Lundberg and Gerell, 1986; Jones, 1997).”
BackgroundLaw, B., Reinhold, L., & Pennay, M. (2002) · Acta Chiropterologica · doi:10.3161/001.004.0208 · Cited by 52
“For instance, selective pressures for acoustic divergence and speciation could involve the influence of call frequency on echo strength from acoustic targets of different sizes and thus prey selection (Jones, 1997).”
BackgroundSantos, H., Javier Juste, B., Ibáñez, C., Palmeirim, J. M., Godinho, R., Amorim, F., Alves, P. J., Costa, H., de Paz, Ó., Pérez‐Suárez, G., et al. (2014) · Biological Journal of the Linnean Society · doi:10.1111/bij.12247 · Cited by 51
“Cryptic species, defined as ecologically and/or genetically 56 distinct species with very similar morphology (Jones, 1997), pose a challenge to 57 understanding species distributions as they bring the need to redefine what was 58 once thought to be a single species’ distribution and environmental…”
BackgroundSelf-citationWing morphology, echolocation, and resource partitioning in syntopic Cuban mormoopid bats
Mancina, C., García-Rivera, L., & Miller, B. (2012) · Journal of Mammalogy · doi:10.1644/11-mamm-a-331.1 · Cited by 48
“On the other hand, small interspecific differences in frequency of echolocation calls could be responsible for differing prey selection (Jones 1997).”
BackgroundPavan, A. C., Bobrowiec, P. E. D., & Percequillo, A. R. (2018) · Journal of Mammalogy · doi:10.1093/jmammal/gyy048 · Cited by 48
“While bats calling at higher frequencies are expected to catch smaller insects with more efficiency, those emitting at lower frequencies will target larger insects more successfully (Jones 1997; Kingston et al. 2001).”
BackgroundWong, J. G., & Waters, D. A. (2001) · Journal of Experimental Biology · doi:10.1242/jeb.204.3.575 · Cited by 46
Foley, N. M., Goodman, S. M., Whelan, C., Puechmaille, S. J., & Teeling, E. C. (2017) · Acta Chiropterologica · doi:10.3161/15081109acc2017.19.1.001 · Cited by 45
Jahelková, H., Horáček, I., & Bartonička, T. (2008) · Acta Chiropterologica · doi:10.3161/150811008x331144 · Cited by 43
Chornelia, A., Lu, J.-M., & Hughes, A. C. (2022) · Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution · doi:10.3389/fevo.2022.854509 · Cited by 47
“First, acoustic differentiation can be the consequence of genetic drift and or founder effects in isolated populations, or selection within communities (Jones, 1997).”
BackgroundNg, E. Y. X., Eaton, J. A., Verbelen, P., Hutchinson, R. O., & Rheindt, F. E. (2016) · Biological Journal of the Linnean Society · doi:10.1111/bij.12768 · Cited by 40
“…tool for determining species limits and has allowed the recognition of allopatric taxa with distinct vocalizations as species rather than subspecies, especially in elusive and morphologically similar groups (Jones, 1997; Isler, Isler & Whitney, 1999; Isler et al., 2001; Alstr€om & Ranft, 2003).”
MethodTaylor, R. S., Bolton, M., Beard, A., Birt, T. P., Deane‐Coe, P. E., Raine, A. F., González‐Solís, J., Lougheed, S. C., & Friesen, V. L. (2019) · Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution · doi:10.1016/j.ympev.2019.106552 · Cited by 38
“However, cryptic species of birds were once considered rare due to the perceived importance of vision in the recognition of sexual characteristics (Jones, 1997).”
BackgroundRusso, D., & Jones, G. (2000) · Mammalia · doi:10.1515/mamm.2000.64.2.187 · Cited by 38
Self-citationJiang, T., Feng, J., Sun, K., & Wang, J. (2008) · Progress in Natural Science Materials International · doi:10.1016/j.pnsc.2007.12.005 · Cited by 36
de Kort, S. R., Hartog, P. M. D., & ten Cate, C. (2002) · Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology · doi:10.1007/s00265-001-0449-8 · Cited by 36
Jacobs, D., Babiker, H., Bastian, A., Kearney, T., van Eeden, R., & Bishop, J. (2013) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0082614 · Cited by 43
“These cryptic species all co-occurred and such differences in sensory traits may be important isolating mechanisms between species [63] leading to resource partitioning and subsequent genetic divergence.”
BackgroundRibot, R. F. H., Berg, M. L., Buchanan, K. L., Komdeur, J., Joseph, L., & Bennett, A. T. D. (2009) · Animal Behaviour · doi:10.1016/j.anbehav.2008.10.029 · Cited by 33
“Among those that are often considered important are: (1) ecological selection, either directly as a result of habitat features that affect sound transmission (the ‘acoustic adaptation hypothesis’, Morton 1975; see also Wiley & Richards 1983; Endler 1992; Forrest 1994; Jones 1997; Patten et al. 2004; Seddon 2005; Nicho…”
Traditions in mammalian and avian vocal communication
Janik, V. M., & Slater, P. J. B. (2003) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511584022.009 · Cited by 33
Henry, C. S., Wells, M. L. M., & Holsinger, K. E. (2002) · Contemporary issues in genetics and evolution · doi:10.1007/978-94-010-0265-3_11 · Cited by 31
“Advocates of one view (e.g., Jones, 1997 ) contend that adaptive, ecological divergence always precedes sexual selection in the origin of cryptic species.”
BackgroundInfluentialJiang, T., Liu, R., Metzner, W., You, Y., Li, S., Liu, S., & Feng, J. (2010) · Ethology · doi:10.1111/j.1439-0310.2010.01785.x · Cited by 30
Correlated Genetic and Ecological Diversification in a Widespread Southern African Horseshoe Bat
Stoffberg, S., Schoeman, M. C., & Matthee, C. A. (2012) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0031946 · Cited by 30
“Most cryptic bat species, identified through molecular techniques, cannot be identified using external morphology but often do show other distinguishing characters, either in echolocation call [12–14] or more subtle morphological characters such as cranial morphology or tragus shape [15,16].”
BackgroundLópez‐Baucells, A., Torrent, L., Rocha, R., Pavan, A. C., Bobrowiec, P. E. D., & Meyer, C. F. J. (2017) · Bioacoustics · doi:10.1080/09524622.2017.1357145 · Cited by 30
Ashrafi, S., Bontadina, F., Kiefer, A., Pavlinić, I., & Arlettaz, R. (2010) · Journal of Zoology · doi:10.1111/j.1469-7998.2010.00697.x · Cited by 28
“Cryptic species are a group of species that are morphologically alike and hence difficult to distinguish based on external features, despite being genetically distinct (Jones, 1997).”
BackgroundHenry, C. S., Wells, M. L. M., & Holsinger, K. E. (2002) · Genetica · doi:10.1023/a:1021240611362 · Cited by 28
Ahmadi, M., Naderi, M., Kaboli, M., Nazarizadeh, M., Karami, M., & Beitollahi, S. M. (2018) · Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution · doi:10.1016/j.ympev.2018.06.019 · Cited by 28
Oliveira, H. F. M., de Camargo, N. F., Hemprich-Bennett, D. R., Rodríguez‐Herrera, B., Rossiter, S. J., & Clare, E. L. (2020) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0232601 · Cited by 27
“In contrast, lower frequencies are associated with foraging in more open areas [70].”
BackgroundMontauban, C., Mas, M., Corral, C. T., Wangensteen, O. S., Budinski, I., Martí‐Carreras, J., Flaquer, C., Puig‐Montserrat, X., & López‐Baucells, A. (2021) · Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology · doi:10.1007/s00265-021-03002-7 · Cited by 30
“Many bat species have gone undocumented over time (Jones 1997; Kunz and Parsons 2009; Altringham 2011), especially cryptic species—defined as two or more closely related species that could be easily misidentified due to their morphological similarity (Bickford et al. 2007).”
BackgroundInfluentialNew mitochondrial lineages within the Pipistrellus pipistrellus complex from Mediterranean Europe
Hulva, P., Benda, P., Hanák, V., Evin, A., & Horáček, I. (2007) · Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) · doi:10.5281/zenodo.18026646 · Cited by 27
Bastian, A., & Jacobs, D. S. (2015) · Animal Behaviour · doi:10.1016/j.anbehav.2014.12.010 · Cited by 26
“…allowing identification of competitors, predators and prey, whereas the recognition of conspecifics is a prerequisite for any species-specific interactions, especially for mate choice (Jones, 1997; Sandoval, M endez, & Mennill, 2013; Slabbekoorn & Smith, 2002; Wilkins, Seddon, & Safran, 2013).”
BackgroundCaraballo, D. A., Montani, M. E., Martínez, L., Antoniazzi, L. R., Sambrana, T. C., Fernández, C., Cisterna, D. M., Beltrán, F. J., & Colombo, V. C. (2020) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0244750 · Cited by 26
“Traditionally, bats have been identified based on morphological characters or biometric measurements [4, 5], and subsequently by echolocation acoustic analysis [6].”
BackgroundFirst use of acoustic calls to distinguish cryptic members of a fish species complex
Parmentier, É., Scalbert, R., Raick, X., Gache, C., Frédérich, B., Bertucci, F., & Lecchini, D. (2021) · Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society · doi:10.1093/zoolinnean/zlab056 · Cited by 26
The Distinctive Structure of Social Calls by Hanák's Dwarf BatPipistrellus hanaki
Georgiakakis, P., & Russo, D. (2012) · Acta Chiropterologica · doi:10.3161/150811012x654385 · Cited by 26
“Pip i - strelle bats frequently emit agonistic social calls at foraging sites to repel conspecifics especially at low insect densities (Miller and Degn, 1981; Racey and Swift, 1985; Barlow and Jones, 1997b).”
BackgroundMethodResultInfluentialZhang, L., Liang, B., Parsons, S. E., Wei, L., & Zhang, S. Y. (2006) · Journal of Zoology · doi:10.1111/j.1469-7998.2006.00210.x · Cited by 26
“Many studies have been carried out to investigate coexistence in morphologically similar sympatric species of bats (Woodsworth, 1981; Herd & Fenton, 1983; Saunders & Barclay, 1992; Arlettaz, Perrin & Hausser, 1997; Jones, 1997; Arlettaz, 1999).”
InfluentialIncongruence between genetic and morphological diversity in Microcebus griseorufus of Beza Mahafaly.
Heckman, K. L., Rasoazanabary, E., Machlin, E., Godfrey, L. R., & Yoder, A. D. (2006) · BMC Evolutionary Biology · doi:10.1186/1471-2148-6-98 · Cited by 25
“Given that they are strictly nocturnal, theory [13-15] would predict that mouse lemurs will emphasize olfactory and auditory communication signals over visual signals, as has been demonstrated for other nocturnal primates [1,2], [5,6], [16-18].”
BackgroundBudenz, T. D., Heib, S., & Kusch, J. (2009) · Acta Chiropterologica · doi:10.3161/150811009x465794 · Cited by 22
Raick, X., Huby, A., Kurchevski, G., Godinho, A. L., & Parmentier, É. (2020) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0241316 · Cited by 22
“The distinction between species appears to be possible because acoustic signalling may be more flexible than morphology [17].”
BackgroundSocial calls are subject to stabilizing selection in insular bats
Russo, D., Teixeira, S., Cistrone, L., Jesus, J., Teixeira, D., Freitas, T., & Jones, G. (2009) · Journal of Biogeography · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2699.2009.02158.x · Cited by 22
“Pressures leading to social call divergence are also evident in the sympatric pipistrelles P. pipistrellus and P. pygmaeus (Barlow & Jones, 1997a; Russo & Jones, 2000).”
BackgroundMethodResultInfluentialSelf-citationWilkins, M. R., Scordato, E. S. C., Semenov, G. А., Karaardıç, H., Shizuka, D., Rubtsov, A. S., Pap, P. L., Shen, S., & Safran, R. J. (2018) · Biological Journal of the Linnean Society · doi:10.1093/biolinnean/bly012 · Cited by 19
“…evolutionary lability, acoustic signals have been proposed to play an important role in the formation of pre-zygotic reproductive barriers and may facilitate or even drive the process of speciation (Blair, 1958; Jones, 1997; Slabbekoorn & Smith, 2002; Price, 2008; Wilkins, Seddon & Safran, 2013).”
Srinivasulu, C., Srinivasulu, A., Srinivasulu, B., & Jones, G. (2019) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0213562 · Cited by 24
Self-citationVallo, P., Benda, P., Martínková, N., Kaňuch, P., Kalko, E., Červený, J., & Koubek, P. (2011) · Acta Chiropterologica · doi:10.3161/150811011x578633 · Cited by 20
Nagel, R., Kirschbaum, F., Hofmann, V., Engelmann, J., & Tiedemann, R. (2018) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-018-29132-z · Cited by 17
Milić, D., Radenković, S., Ačanski, J., & Vujić, A. (2018) · Journal of Insect Conservation · doi:10.1007/s10841-018-0111-7 · Cited by 17
“Hidden or cryptic species are defined as genetically- and/or ecologically-distinct species that are almost indiscernible in their morphology (Jones 1997).”
BackgroundHorvatić, S., Malavasi, S., Vukić, J., Šanda, R., Marčić, Z., Ćaleta, M., Lorenzoni, M., Mustafić, P., Buj, I., Onorato, L., et al. (2021) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0260810 · Cited by 17
“On the other hand, stochastic (or “neutral”) forces, such as sexual or social selection [21, 22] or more commonly, genetic drift and mutation [13, 23–25] could be the driving initiators for signal divergence.”
BackgroundMale-mediated species recognition among African weakly electric fishes
Nagel, R., Kirschbaum, F., Engelmann, J., Hofmann, V., Pawelzik, F., & Tiedemann, R. (2018) · Royal Society Open Science · doi:10.1098/rsos.170443 · Cited by 16
Lavery, T. H., Leung, L. K. ‐., & Seddon, J. M. (2014) · Zoologica Scripta · doi:10.1111/zsc.12068 · Cited by 16
“Such variation in echolocation frequency has the capacity to limit social interactions in echolocating bats (Jones 1997).”
BackgroundUsing Approximate Bayesian Computation to infer sex ratios from acoustic data
Lehnen, L., Schorcht, W., Karst, I., Biedermann, M., Kerth, G., & Puechmaille, S. J. (2018) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0199428 · Cited by 15
Leger, D. W., & Mountjoy, D. J. (2003) · The Auk · doi:10.1642/0004-8038(2003)120[0069:gvisot]2.0.co;2 · Cited by 15
“The discovery of crypic species on the basis of differences in acoustic signal structure is occurring in other taxa as well, including insects and mammals (Henry 1994, Jones 1997).”
BackgroundDai, W., Li, A.-Q., Chang, Y., Liu, T., Zhang, L., Li, J., Leng, H., Li, Z., Jin, L., Sun, K.-P., et al. (2023) · Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution · doi:10.3389/fevo.2023.1108514 · Cited by 11
“The prey detection hypothesis suggests that differences in echolocation frequencies may cause differentiation in prey sizes and that highfrequency calls are more sensitive to detecting smaller prey items (Barclay and Brigham, 1991; Jones, 1997).”
BackgroundNo phenotypic signature of acoustic competition in songs of a tropical cricket assemblage
Schmidt, A. K. D., Riede, K., & Römer, H. (2015) · Behavioral Ecology · doi:10.1093/beheco/arv141 · Cited by 14
“In addition, no support has been presented for indirect selection in crickets due to pleiotropic effects that link song differentiation as a by-product to ecological or morphological adaptions to the environment (Otte 1992; Jones 1997; Podos 2001).”
BackgroundHistory of the Pipistrellus pipistrellus group in Central Europe in light of its fossil record
Horáček, I., & Jahelková, H. (2005) · Acta Chiropterologica · doi:10.3161/1733-5329(2005)7[189:hotppg]2.0.co;2 · Cited by 14
“Differences in songflight calls and social calls between the phonic types were demonstrated by Barlow and Jones (1997), and their separation in time of mating suggested their reproductive isolation (Park et al., 1996).”
BackgroundGeographic variation in the duets of the Rufous-naped Wren (Campylorhynchus rufinucha) complex
Ku-Peralta, W., Navarro-Sigüenza, A. G., Sandoval, L., & Sosa-López, J. R. (2020) · The Auk · doi:10.1093/auk/ukaa015 · Cited by 14
“In non–vocal learners, species divergence among isolated populations could emerge from selective forces such as ecology and mate choice, or could arise as a result of non-selective forces such as genetic drift (Jones 1997, Podos et al.”
BackgroundFilippi-Codaccioni, O., Beugin, M., de Vienne, D. M., Portanier, E., Fouchet, D., Kaerle, C., Muselet, L., Queney, G., PETIT, E. J., Régis, C., et al. (2018) · BMC Evolutionary Biology · doi:10.1186/s12862-018-1289-8 · Cited by 13
“Cryptic species are fairly common in echolocating bats [21].”
BackgroundRaw, R. N. V., Bastian, A., & Jacobs, D. (2018) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0199703 · Cited by 9
Bats’ echolocation call characteristics of cryptic Iberian Eptesicus species
Horta, P., Raposeira, H., Santos, H., Alves, P. J., Palmeirim, J. M., Godinho, R., Jones, G., & Rebelo, H. (2015) · European Journal of Wildlife Research · doi:10.1007/s10344-015-0957-x · Cited by 9
“Consequently, several cryptic bat species (ecologically and/or genetically distinct species with similar morphology (Jones 1997)) have recently been identified worldwide (e.g. Chadès et al. 2008; Kaliontzopoulou et al. 2011; Boratynski et al. 2012).”
BackgroundSelf-citationBaldwin, H. J., Vallo, P., Ruiz, A. T., Anti, P., Nkrumah, E. E., Badu, E. K., Oppong, S., Kalko, E., Tschapka, M., & Stow, A. (2021) · Journal of Zoological Systematics and Evolutionary Research · doi:10.1111/jzs.12506 · Cited by 11
“In recent years, molecular, acoustic, behavioral, and morphological analyses have revealed a number of cryptic bat species within previously unsuspected taxa (Jones, 1997; Jones & Barlow, 2004; Kingston et al., 2001; Russo & Jones, 2000; Thabah et al., 2006).”
BackgroundThe magnitude of cryptic insect diversity in one tropical rainforest
Basset, Y., Lamarre, G. P. A., Donoso, D. A., Souto‐Vilarós, D., Perez, F., Bobadilla, R., Lopez, Y., Silva, J. A. R., & Barrios, H. (2025) · Insect Conservation and Diversity · doi:10.1111/icad.12861 · Cited by 8
“…reproductive isolation, such as the infestation rate of endosymbiotic intracellular Wolbachia spp. bacteria (Zhang et al., 2022), sexual selection (Jones, 1997) or allopatry (Lukhtanov et al., 2015); (b) niche separation on an axis that does not include morphological factors (bioacoustics, host…”
Ramesh, V., Vijayakumar, S. P., Gopalakrishna, T., Jayarajan, A., & Shanker, K. (2020) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0237431 · Cited by 8
“isolation through mechanisms that cannot be discerned or detected [6].”
BackgroundComplex courtship in the Habronattus clypeatus group (Araneae: Salticidae)
Rivera, C., Hedin, M. C., Mason, A. C., Maddison, W. P., & Elias, D. O. (2021) · Journal of Arachnology · doi:10.1636/joa-s-18-045 · Cited by 8
Cheirogaleid diversity and evolution: big questions about small primates
Yoder, A. D., Weisrock, D. W., Rasoloarison, R. M., & Kappeler, P. M. (2016) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9781139871822.002 · Cited by 8
López‐Cuamatzi, I. L., Ortega, J., Ospina‐Garcés, S. M., Zúñiga, G., & G., M. C. M. (2024) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0296275 · Cited by 7
Lavery, T. H., DeRaad, D. A., Holland, P. S., Olson, K. V., DeCicco, L. H., Seddon, J. M., Leung, L. K. ‐., & Moyle, R. G. (2024) · Evolution · doi:10.1093/evolut/qpae039 · Cited by 8
“Disruptive ecological selection commonly acts on echolocation frequencies of bats in association with prey size specializations (Jones, 1997), and simple body size divergence in bats has extraordinary importance for trophic niche partitioning and stable coexistence of sympatric species (Andreas et…”
BackgroundAdded value of metabarcoding combined with microscopy for evolutionary studies of mammals
Haarsma, A., Siepel, H., & Gravendeel, B. (2016) · Zoologica Scripta · doi:10.1111/zsc.12214 · Cited by 10
“Auditory signals used to delimit territory, such as made by bats, whales, lemurs and deer, are useful tools for species delimitation as well, especially to keep morphologically similar species apart (Jones 1997).”
BackgroundQian, Q., Li, J., Fu, M., Zou, M., Tian, T., Yan, Y., Newman, C., Zou, D., & Zhou, Y. (2024) · Integrative Zoology · doi:10.1111/1749-4877.12937 · Cited by 6
Tamura, N., Boonkhaw, P., Prayoon, U., Phan, Q. T., Yu, P., Liu, X., & Hayashi, F. (2021) · Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology · doi:10.1007/s00265-021-03022-3 · Cited by 6
“Geographic variation in mating calls is also documented in mammals (Jones 1997; Campbell et al.”
Background
Metadata
- Authors
- Jones, G.
- Affiliations
- University of Bristol (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Jones, Gareth
- ORCID
- Jones, Gareth
- Venue
- Advances in the Study of Behavior
- Publisher
- Elsevier
- Published
- 1997
- Pages
- 317-354
- ISSN
- 0065-3454 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1879860871
- Cited by
- 135
- References
- 136
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 13 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 5
- FWCI
- 2.28
- Type
- book chapter
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Advances in the study of behavior (publishedVersion)
- Explore Bristol Research (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic diversity and population structure
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Avian ecology and behavior
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics › Animal Behavior and Reproduction
- Keywords
- cryptic species, speciation, allochrony, temporal isolation, acoustic signals, sexual selection, natural selection, population structure, phylogenomics, gene flow barriers, seabirds, mitochondrial DNA control region, cytochrome b, nuclear genome
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review