Cited by 367Action Observation and SynchronizationEmbodied and Extended CognitionChild and Animal Learning Development

Towards a unifying neural theory of social cognition

Keysers, Christian, Gazzola, Valeria·2006·Progress in Brain Research

Abstract

Humans can effortlessly understand a lot of what is going on in other peoples' minds. Understanding the neural basis of this capacity has proven quite difficult. Since the discovery of mirror neurons, a number of successful experiments have approached the question of how we understand the actions of others from the perspective of sharing their actions. Recently we have demonstrated that a similar logic may apply to understanding the emotions and sensations of others. Here, we therefore review evidence that a single mechanism (shared circuits) applies to actions, sensations and emotions: witnessing the actions, sensations and emotions of other individuals activates brain areas normally involved in performing the same actions and feeling the same sensations and emotions. We propose that these circuits, shared between the first (I do, I feel) and third person perspective (seeing her do, seeing her feel) translate the vision and sound of what other people do and feel into the language of the observers own actions and feelings. This translation could help understand the actions and feelings of others by providing intuitive insights into their inner life. We propose a mechanism for the development of shared circuits on the basis of Hebbian learning, and underline that shared circuits could integrate with more cognitive functions during social cognitions.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0079-6123(06)56021-2

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Recent theories of social cognition suggest that cortical areas related to MSA and mirror neuron system structures related to SRs should both be engaged when perceivers make inferences about target states.

    “Recent theories of social cognition recognize this likelihood and suggest that cortical areas related to MSA and mirror neuron system structures related to SRs should both be engaged when perceivers make inferences about target states (20, 28, 29).”

    From The neural bases of empathic accuracy (2009) · cites this paper as [29]

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 148 · Cited by 367

Authors
Keysers, C., & Gazzola, V.
Affiliations
University Medical Center Groningen (NL)
Corresponding author
Keysers, Christian
Venue
Progress in Brain Research
Publisher
Elsevier
Published
2006
Volume
156
Pages
379-401
ISSN
0079-6123 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2112948561
Cited by
367
References
148
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 23 · 2018: 13 · 2017: 13 · 2016: 27 · 2015: 18 · 2014: 16 · 2013: 21 · 2012: 31
FWCI
64.90
Type
book chapter
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Progress in brain research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • University of Groningen research database (University of Groningen / Centre for Information Technology) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Nederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Action Observation and Synchronization
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Embodied and Extended Cognition
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Child and Animal Learning Development
Keywords
social cognition, mirror neurons, theory of mind, action understanding, emotional understanding, first-person perspective, third-person perspective, Hebbian learning, neural basis of social cognition
MeSH terms
Animals, Brain, Cognition, Emotions, Empathy, Humans, Models, Neurological, Psychological Theory, Social Behavior

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review