The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Ring currents
Open accessAbstract
ID: 94375 Title: SuperMAG geomagnetic indices: Do more stations provide better monitoring of the M-I current system? Presenter/First Author: Jesper W Gjerloev, Johns Hopkins University Applied Physics Laboratory, Laurel, MD Presenter/First Author Email: jesper.gjerloev@jhuapl.edu Presenter/First Author Student?: No Published Material: 0% Abstract Body: Over the last few years a wave of new indices have been proposed and released through the SuperMAG initiative. The basic assumption behind these indices is that the more stations used to derive the indices the better the current systems are monitored. This supposedly includes improved timing, intensity and location. Examples are the ring current indices (IAGA SYM-H use six station vs. SuperMAG SMR using ~100 stations) and auroral electrojet indices (IAGA AE use 12 stations vs. SuperMAG SME using ~110 stations).Body: Over the last few years a wave of new indices have been proposed and released through the SuperMAG initiative. The basic assumption behind these indices is that the more stations used to derive the indices the better the current systems are monitored. This supposedly includes improved timing, intensity and location. Examples are the ring current indices (IAGA SYM-H use six station vs. SuperMAG SMR using ~100 stations) and auroral electrojet indices (IAGA AE use 12 stations vs. SuperMAG SME using ~110 stations). The purpose of the various magnetic indices is to provide information of the currents in question. The pitfalls, however, are many: 1) do the indices have appropriate temporal resolution?, 2) are they derived from a network of stations with sufficient spatial coverage?, 3) is it reasonable to assume that a given level of an index implies a certain 2D current distribution?, 4) to what extend do the indices actually monitor the current system in mind?. To address some of these problems SuperMAG indices with local time information has been published (e.g. SME 24 local time indices and SMR 4 local time indices). The basic purpose of the various indices is to monitor the M-I current system. We discuss to what extend the IAGA and SuperMAG indices actually fulfill this objective.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Self-consistent molecular orbital methods. XX. A basis set for correlated wave functions
Krishnan, R., Binkley, J. S., Seeger, R., & Pople, J. A. (1980) · The Journal of Chemical Physics · doi:10.1063/1.438955 · Cited by 17,772
Nucleus-Independent Chemical Shifts: A Simple and Efficient Aromaticity Probe
Schleyer, P. V. R., Maerker, C., Dransfeld, A., Jiao, H., & van Eikema Hommes, N. J. R. (1996) · Journal of the American Chemical Society · doi:10.1021/ja960582d · Cited by 6,210
A Suggested Interpretation of the Quantum Theory in Terms of "Hidden" Variables. I
Bohm, D. (1952) · Physical Review · doi:10.1103/physrev.85.166 · Cited by 5,510
The Methodology of Scientific Research Programmes: Philosophical Papers
Lakatos, I. (1978) · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511621123 · Cited by 3,045
Absolute Asymmetric Synthesis under Physical Fields: Facts and Fictions
Avalos, M., Babiano, R., Cintas, P., Jiménez, J. L., Palacios, J. C., & Barron, L. D. (1998) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/cr970096o · Cited by 306
Cited by
Nucleus-Independent Chemical Shifts (NICS) as an Aromaticity Criterion
Chen, Z., Wannere, C. S., Corminboeuf, C., Puchta, R., & Schleyer, P. V. R. (2005) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/cr030088+ · Cited by 3,847
Geuenich, D., Hess, K., Köhler, F., & Herges, R. (2005) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/cr0300901 · Cited by 1,675
Which NICS Aromaticity Index for Planar π Rings Is Best?
Fallah-Bagher-Shaidaei, H., Wannere, C. S., Corminboeuf, C., Puchta, R., & Schleyer, P. V. R. (2006) · Organic Letters · doi:10.1021/ol0529546 · Cited by 1,257
Magnetic criteria of aromaticity
Gershoni-Poranne, R., & Stanger, A. (2015) · Chem. Soc. Rev. · doi:10.1039/c5cs00114e · Cited by 494
Mechanistic insights into sodium storage in hard carbon anodes using local structure probes
Stratford, J. M., Allan, P. K., Pecher, O., Chater, P. A., & Grey, C. P. (2016) · Chemical Communications · doi:10.1039/c6cc06990h · Cited by 359
Metadata
- Authors
- Lazzeretti, P.
- Venue
- Progress in Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2000-02
- Volume
- 36
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 1-88
- ISSN
- 0079-6565 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W4211102859
- Cited by
- 439
- References
- 5
- FWCI
- 5.79
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Ring currents. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/s0079-6565(99)00021-7
- The paper
- Lazzeretti, P. (2000). Ring currents. Progress in Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0079-6565(99)00021-7
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.