Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 439

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Ring currents

Open access
Lazzeretti, P.·2000·Progress in Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy

Abstract

ID: 94375 Title: SuperMAG geomagnetic indices: Do more stations provide better monitoring of the M-I current system? Presenter/First Author: Jesper W Gjerloev, Johns Hopkins University Applied Physics Laboratory, Laurel, MD Presenter/First Author Email: jesper.gjerloev@jhuapl.edu Presenter/First Author Student?: No Published Material: 0% Abstract Body: Over the last few years a wave of new indices have been proposed and released through the SuperMAG initiative. The basic assumption behind these indices is that the more stations used to derive the indices the better the current systems are monitored. This supposedly includes improved timing, intensity and location. Examples are the ring current indices (IAGA SYM-H use six station vs. SuperMAG SMR using ~100 stations) and auroral electrojet indices (IAGA AE use 12 stations vs. SuperMAG SME using ~110 stations).Body: Over the last few years a wave of new indices have been proposed and released through the SuperMAG initiative. The basic assumption behind these indices is that the more stations used to derive the indices the better the current systems are monitored. This supposedly includes improved timing, intensity and location. Examples are the ring current indices (IAGA SYM-H use six station vs. SuperMAG SMR using ~100 stations) and auroral electrojet indices (IAGA AE use 12 stations vs. SuperMAG SME using ~110 stations). The purpose of the various magnetic indices is to provide information of the currents in question. The pitfalls, however, are many: 1) do the indices have appropriate temporal resolution?, 2) are they derived from a network of stations with sufficient spatial coverage?, 3) is it reasonable to assume that a given level of an index implies a certain 2D current distribution?, 4) to what extend do the indices actually monitor the current system in mind?. To address some of these problems SuperMAG indices with local time information has been published (e.g. SME 24 local time indices and SMR 4 local time indices). The basic purpose of the various indices is to monitor the M-I current system. We discuss to what extend the IAGA and SuperMAG indices actually fulfill this objective.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0079-6565(99)00021-7

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 5 references

Cited by

See all 439

Metadata

Authors
Lazzeretti, P.
Venue
Progress in Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2000-02
Volume
36
Issue
1
Pages
1-88
ISSN
0079-6565 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4211102859
Cited by
439
References
5
FWCI
5.79
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Ring currents. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/s0079-6565(99)00021-7
The paper
Lazzeretti, P. (2000). Ring currents. Progress in Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0079-6565(99)00021-7

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.