Cognitive Plasticity and Aging
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Even though biological aging increasingly limits peak cognitive performance, very old people can still improve.
“Although biological aging puts increasingly severe constraints on maximal levels of cognitive performance with advancing age, performance can still be improved in very old persons”
From Enrichment Effects on Adult Cognitive Development: Can the Functional Capacity of Older Adults Be Preserved and Enhanced? (2008) · cites this paper as Kramer & Willis, 2003
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 158 · Cited by 41
- Authors
- Kramer, A. F., & Willis, S. L.
- Venue
- Psychology of Learning and Motivation
- Publisher
- Elsevier
- Published
- 2003
- Pages
- 267-302
- ISSN
- 0079-7421 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W39048167
- Cited by
- 41
- References
- 158
- Citations by year
- 2021: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 5
- FWCI
- 4.88
- Type
- book chapter
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- The Psychology of learning and motivation/The psychology of learning and motivation (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology › Aging and Gerontology Research
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Functions and Memory
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Abilities and Testing
- Keywords
- cognitive plasticity, aging, cognitive aging, neuroplasticity
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
