The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Finding Common Ground in Dispersed Collaboration
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Virtual Teams: What Do We Know and Where Do We Go From Here?
Martins, L. L., Gilson, L. L., & Maynard, M. T. (2004) · Journal of Management · doi:10.1016/j.jm.2004.05.002 · Cited by 1,314
Golden, T. D., Veiga, J. F., & Dino, R. N. (2008) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/a0012722 · Cited by 841
Go (Con)figure: Subgroups, Imbalance, and Isolates in Geographically Dispersed Teams
O'Leary, M. B., & Mortensen, M. (2010) · Organization Science · doi:10.1287/orsc.1090.0434 · Cited by 377
“…contextual information resulting from ingroup homophily and corresponding outgroup avoidance (Coser 1956; Sherif et al. 1961) is likely to leave team members confused about or unaware of distant teammates’ activities and work processes (Cramton 2002; Grinter et al. 1999; Hoegl and Proserpio 2004).”
O’Leary, M. B., Wilson, J. M., & Metiu, A. (2014) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.25300/misq/2014/38.4.13 · Cited by 191
The Role of Shared Mental Model Development in Understanding Virtual Team Effectiveness
Maynard, M. T., & Gilson, L. L. (2014) · Group & Organization Management · doi:10.1177/1059601113475361 · Cited by 143
Metadata
- Authors
- CRAMTON, C. D.
- Venue
- Organizational Dynamics
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2002-06
- Volume
- 30
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 356-367
- ISSN
- 0090-2616 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2060960049
- Cited by
- 166
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 10.27
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Finding Common Ground in Dispersed Collaboration. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/s0090-2616(02)00063-3
- The paper
- CRAMTON, C. D. (2002). Finding Common Ground in Dispersed Collaboration. Organizational Dynamics. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0090-2616(02)00063-3
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
