Cited by 320Sexual function and dysfunction studiesUrological Disorders and TreatmentsUrinary Bladder and Prostate Research

Efficacy of tadalafil for the treatment of erectile dysfunction at 24 and 36 hours after dosing: a randomized controlled trial

Porst, Hartmut, Padma-Nathan, Harin, Giuliano, François, Anglin, Greg, Varanese, Lucio, Rosen, Raymond·2003·Urology

Abstract

Objectives To examine the therapeutic effects of tadalafil on erectile dysfunction (ED) at 24 and 36 hours after dosing. Methods A multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group study of 348 men (mean age 57 years) with ED was conducted in Europe and the United States. Patients were stratified by baseline severity of ED using the Erectile Function domain score of the International Index of Erectile Function and then randomly allocated within the severity group to receive tadalafil 20 mg (n = 175) or placebo (n = 173). Subsequently, participants were randomly assigned to two 4-week treatment intervals, during which they were requested to attempt sexual intercourse approximately 24 or 36 hours after tadalafil or placebo dosing. The primary outcome measure was the proportion of successful sexual intercourse attempts (completed to ejaculation) according to patient self-report using the Sexual Encounter Profile diary. Results Of the 348 patients, 327 (94%) completed the trial (163 of 175 in the tadalafil group and 164 of 173 in the placebo group). Thirty-six hours after tadalafil dosing, 59.2% of intercourse attempts were successful versus 28.3% in the placebo group (P Conclusions Tadalafil 20 mg is an effective and well-tolerated treatment for ED that has a period of responsiveness of up to 36 hours.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0090-4295(03)00359-5

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

No citation lists for this paper

No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.

References 22 · Cited by 320

Authors
Porst, H., Padma-Nathan, H., Giuliano, F., Anglin, G., Varanese, L., & Rosen, R.
Affiliations
  • University of Southern California (US)
  • Eli Lilly (Canada) (CA)
  • Eli Lilly (United Kingdom) (GB)
  • University of Medicine and Dentistry of New Jersey (US)
Corresponding author
Porst, Hartmut
Venue
Urology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2003-07
Volume
62
Issue
1
Pages
121-125
ISSN
0090-4295 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2099719839
Cited by
320
References
22
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 13 · 2013: 12 · 2012: 11
FWCI
26.52
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Urology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Sexual function and dysfunction studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Urology › Urological Disorders and Treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Urology › Urinary Bladder and Prostate Research
Keywords
tadalafil, erectile dysfunction, phosphodiesterase-5 inhibitors, erectile function, adverse events, headache, flushing, dyspepsia, myalgia
MeSH terms
Tadalafil, Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Carbolines, Double-Blind Method, Half-Life, Humans, Erectile Dysfunction, Male, Middle Aged, Phosphodiesterase Inhibitors, Phosphoric Diester Hydrolases, Time Factors, 3',5'-Cyclic-GMP Phosphodiesterases, Treatment Outcome, Patient Satisfaction, Cyclic Nucleotide Phosphodiesterases, Type 5

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review