Cited by 65Sexual function and dysfunction studiesMale Reproductive Health StudiesUrological Disorders and Treatments

Help-seeking decisions among men with impotence

Ansong, K.Steven, Lewis, Carol, Jenkins, Paul, Bell, Joseph·1998·Urology

Abstract

Objectives There is a paucity of valid contemporary data concerning the proportion of impotent men who seek treatment. The aim of this study was to determine the proportion of impotent men who sought treatment, from whom they sought treatment, and their reasons for seeking or not seeking treatment. Methods A self-administered survey of 5198 randomly selected men between 50 and 76 years old, living in four rural counties in central New York State, was used. Results The sample included 649 men who reported having experienced impotence in the 6 months preceding the study period (November 1996 to June 1997). The mean age of these men and mean duration of impotence were 64.5+/-7.2 and 4.9+/-4.6 years, respectively. Two hundred five men (31.6%) had sought treatment, 432 (66.6%) had not, and 12 (1.8%) neglected to answer the question. Most first consulted with either their primary care provider (44.7%) or a urologist (40.7%). Among those who had sought treatment, 36.3% were satisfied, 48.4% were dissatisfied, and 15.2% were neither satisfied nor dissatisfied with the results. The primary reasons for seeking treatment were to improve their self-esteem (44.8%), awareness of a new treatment (33.4%), partner insistence ( 11.3%), and coverage by their health insurance (10.4%). The reasons for not seeking treatment were embarrassment (29.8%), ignorance or misinformation (45.2%), and lack of affordability (25.0%). Conclusions Despite increased availability of effective treatment, most men…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0090-4295(98)00397-5

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

No citation lists for this paper

No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.

References 13 · Cited by 65

Authors
Ansong, K. S., Lewis, C., Jenkins, P., & Bell, J.
Affiliations
Bassett Healthcare Network (US)
Corresponding author
Ansong, K.Steven
Venue
Urology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1998-11
Volume
52
Issue
5
Pages
834-837
ISSN
0090-4295 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2073700731
Cited by
65
References
13
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 3 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 3
FWCI
1.25
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Urology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Sexual function and dysfunction studies
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Male Reproductive Health Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Urology › Urological Disorders and Treatments
Keywords
erectile dysfunction, help-seeking, treatment seeking, barriers to treatment, patient satisfaction, embarrassment, health insurance coverage, primary care providers, urologists, older men, self-esteem
MeSH terms
Aged, Humans, Erectile Dysfunction, Male, Middle Aged, Patient Acceptance of Health Care, Rural Population, Patient Satisfaction

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review