Cited by 78Sexual function and dysfunction studiesUrological Disorders and TreatmentsUrinary Bladder and Prostate Research

The DOI matches its Crossref record; its reference list is not available.

Intraurethral alprostadil for treatment of erectile dysfunction in patients with spinal cord injury

Abstract

Objectives To assess the efficacy of intraurethral prostaglandin E1 (alprostadil, MUSE) in treating erectile dysfunction in patients with spinal cord injury (SCI). Methods Intraurethral alprostadil was tested in 15 patients with SCI to evaluate its effectiveness in treating SCI-associated erectile dysfunction. All patients were at least 1 year after injury, and all had previously used intracavernosal injections successfully (Schramek's grade 5 erection). The intraurethral drug was administered in the office, in the presence of a physician, with monitoring of blood pressure. If effective, the patient was then able to use MUSE at home. The first 3 patients underwent gradual dose escalation starting with 125 microg, without the use of a constriction ring. Because of hypotension, the remaining 12 patients all used a penile constriction ring prior to intraurethral drug administration using 1000 microg. The quality of the erection was compared with that achieved with intracavernosal injections using Schramek's grading. Results The dose escalation (titration) in the first 3 patients demonstrated that the 1000-microg dose was the most effective in creating an erectile response. Transient hypotension was noted in these first 3 patients in whom the constricting band was not used. The highest dose of MUSE (1000 microg) was, therefore, used in the remaining 12 patients, with the constriction band. The quality of the erection varied and appeared to be less rigid in all patients (12 patien…

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0090-4295(98)00435-x

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

No citation lists for this paper

No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.

References 15 · Cited by 78

Research works printed but not linked: 13

  1. Burnett, 1992, Nitric oxide, Science, 257, 401, 10.1126/science.1378650 · DOI
  2. Kim, 1991, A nitric oxide-like factor mediates nonadrenergic-noncholinergic neurogenic relaxation of penile corpus cavernosum smooth muscle, J Clin Invest, 88, 112, 10.1172/JCI115266 · DOI
  3. Wyndaele, 1986, Intracavernous injection of vasoactive drugs, an alternative for treating impotence in spinal cord injury patients, Paraplegia, 24, 271, 10.1038/sc.1986.37 · DOI
  4. Bodner, 1987, The application of intracavernous injection of vasoactive medications for erection in men with spinal cord injury, J Urol, 138, 310, 10.1016/S0022-5347(17)43130-2 · DOI
  5. Lloyd, 1989, Intracavernous pharmacotherapy for management of erectile dysfunction in spinal cord injury, Paraplegia, 27, 457, 10.1038/sc.1989.72 · DOI
  6. Golji, 1979, Experience with penile prosthesis in spinal cord injury patients, J Urol, 121, 288, 10.1016/S0022-5347(17)56756-7 · DOI
  7. Rossier, 1984, Indications and results of semi-rigid penile prostheses in spinal cord injury patients, J Urol, 131, 59, 10.1016/S0022-5347(17)50201-3 · DOI
  8. Witherington, 1989, Vacuum tumescence device for management of erectile impotence, J Urol, 141, 320, 10.1016/S0022-5347(17)40752-X · DOI
  9. Palmer, 1994, Characterization of cyclic AMP accumulation in cultured human corpus cavernosum smooth muscle cells, J Urol, 152, 1308, 10.1016/S0022-5347(17)32573-9 · DOI
  10. Schramek, 1990, Prostaglandin E1 in erectile dysfunction, Br J Urol, 65, 68, 10.1111/j.1464-410X.1990.tb14664.x · DOI
  11. Althof, 1987, Intracavernosal injection in the treatment of impotence, J Sex Marital Ther, 13, 155, 10.1080/00926238708403889 · DOI
  12. Allen, 1992, Objective double-blind evaluation of erectile function with intracorporeal papaverine in combination with phentolamine and/or prostaglandin E1, J Urol, 148, 1181, 10.1016/S0022-5347(17)36853-2 · DOI
  13. Tang, 1995, Intracavernous injection of prostaglandin E1 in spinal cord injured patients with erectile dysfunction, Paraplegia, 33, 731, 10.1038/sc.1995.153 · DOI

Metadata

Authors
Bodner, D. R., Haas, C. A., Krueger, B., & Seftel, A. D.
Affiliations
Case Western Reserve University (US)
Corresponding author
Bodner, Donald R
Venue
Urology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1999-01
Volume
53
Issue
1
Pages
199-202
ISSN
0090-4295 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2118874651
Cited by
78
References
15
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 3
FWCI
3.33
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Urology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Sexual function and dysfunction studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Urology › Urological Disorders and Treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Urology › Urinary Bladder and Prostate Research
Keywords
Muses, erectile dysfunction, spinal cord injury, prostaglandin E1, intracavernous injection, hypotension, dose titration, patient satisfaction
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Alprostadil, Humans, Erectile Dysfunction, Middle Aged, Spinal Cord Injuries, Urethra, Vasodilator Agents

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review