Cited by 81Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on BehaviorNeuroscience and Neuropharmacology ResearchSchizophrenia research and treatment

Noradrenergic alpha-2 receptor agonists reverse working memory deficits induced by the anxiogenic drug, FG7142, in rats

Birnbaum, S.G, Podell, D.M, Arnsten, A.F.T·2000·Pharmacology Biochemistry and Behavior

Abstract

Performance on working memory tasks, a measure of prefrontal cortical function, is impaired by exposure to mild stress as well as the anxiogenic drug, FG7142. Previous studies have shown that like stress, FG7142 increases catecholamine release in the prefrontal cortex (PFC) and that high levels of dopamine (DA) D(1) and norepinephrine (NE) alpha-1 receptor stimulation underlie the FG7142-induced cognitive impairment. Both the FG7142-induced DA turnover and working memory deficit can be blocked by pretreatment with the nonselective NE alpha-2/imidazoline I1 receptor agonist, clonidine. The present study examined the alpha-2 adrenoceptor subtype underlying this reversal in FG7142-induced working memory deficits by comparing the efficacy of clonidine with the more selective alpha-2A adrenoceptor agonist, guanfacine. The anxiogenic drug, FG7142 (0, 10, 20, or 30 mg/kg), dose-dependently impaired delayed alternation performance. Clonidine pretreatment (0.1 mg/kg, 30 min prior to FG7142) partially reversed the FG7142-induced impairment while guanfacine pretreatment (0.11 mg/kg) completely blocked the FG7142-induced impairment. Neither clonidine nor guanfacine had any effect on performance when administered alone. This study suggests that stimulation of the NE alpha-2A receptor subtype is sufficient to ameliorate the cognitive deficit induced by FG7142. Clonidine's sedative and hypotensive side effects limit its therapeutic usefulness; however, selective alpha-2A receptor agonists m…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0091-3057(00)00306-3

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

No citation lists for this paper

No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.

References 55 · Cited by 81

Authors
Birnbaum, S. G., Podell, D. M., & Arnsten, A. F. T.
Affiliations
Yale University (US)
Corresponding author
Birnbaum, S.G
Venue
Pharmacology Biochemistry and Behavior
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2000-11
Volume
67
Issue
3
Pages
397-403
ISSN
0091-3057 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2049664601
Cited by
81
References
55
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 1
FWCI
1.29
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Pharmacology Biochemistry and Behavior (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Institute on Aging (AG06036)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Schizophrenia research and treatment
Keywords
FG 7142, working memory deficits, guanfacine, clonidine, anxiogenic drugs, prefrontal cortex, delayed alternation, catecholamine release, dopamine D1 receptor
MeSH terms
Adrenergic alpha-Agonists, Animals, Carbolines, Clonidine, Male, Memory, Memory Disorders, Second Messenger Systems, Guanfacine, Rats, Sprague-Dawley, Receptors, Adrenergic, alpha-2, GABA Antagonists, Rats, Adrenergic alpha-2 Receptor Agonists

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review