Opioid blockade improves human recognition memory following physiological arousal
Abstract
Rationale States of heightened emotion and arousal, such as those that may occur during crimes or traumatic accidents, can impair human memory. Animal models suggest that such memory alterations may be mediated by opioid neuropeptides. In some experimental paradigms, opioid blockade reverses memory impairments related to arousal. Objectives The present study evaluated the hypothesis that, under conditions of heightened arousal, opioid blockade would enhance memory in human subjects. Methods Memory for story information was evaluated among subjects randomized to one of four study groups (two orthogonal study conditions): (1) no arousal+no opioid blockade, (2) no arousal+opioid blockade, (3) arousal+no opioid blockade, and (4) arousal+opioid blockade. Both free recall and recognition memory were assessed. Opioid receptor blockade was achieved using a single oral dose of naltrexone. Results With heightened arousal, subjects receiving naltrexone performed better than those receiving placebo on tests of total and incidental recognition memory. In contrast, with emotionally neutral stimuli, naltrexone subjects performed worse than placebo subjects. Conclusions These findings demonstrate that opioid peptides mediate alterations in specific aspects of human memory during heightened emotional states, and help to explain why memories may be selectively deficient under conditions of stress.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In human populations, treatment with naltrexone improved recognition memory following stress induction by physiologically arousing stimuli compared to placebo.
“These findings are mirrored in human populations, where treatment with naltrexone (opioid receptor antagonist) improved recognition memory following stress induction by physiologically arousing stimuli as compared to a matched placebo condition (KatzenPerez et al., 2001).”
From A review of the relation between dissociation, memory, executive functioning and social cognition in military members and civilians with neuropsychiatric conditions (2016) · cites this paper as KatzenPerez et al., 2001
Cites
Semantic integration of verbal information into a visual memory
Loftus, E. F., Miller, D. G., & Burns, H. J. (1978) · Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory · doi:10.1037/0278-7393.4.1.19 · Cited by 1,511 · see citing works
β-Adrenergic activation and memory for emotional events
Cahill, L., Prins, B., Weber, M., & McGaugh, J. L. (1994) · Nature · doi:10.1038/371702a0 · Cited by 1,271 · see citing works
Emotional stress and eyewitness memory: A critical review
Christianson, S.-Å. (1992) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.112.2.284 · Cited by 1,112 · see citing works
Vivid memories of emotional events: the accuracy of remembered minutiae
Heuer, F., & Reisberg, D. (1990) · Memory & Cognition · doi:10.3758/bf03198482 · Cited by 454 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
depue, R. A., & morrone-strupinsky, J. V. (2005) · Behavioral and Brain Sciences · doi:10.1017/s0140525x05000063 · Cited by 958 · see citing works
McKinnon, M. C., Boyd, J. E., Frewen, P. A., Lanius, U. F., Jetly, R., Richardson, J. D., & Lanius, R. A. (2016) · Neuropsychologia · doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2016.07.017 · Cited by 94 · see citing works
- Authors
- KatzenPerez, K. R., Jacobs, D. W., Lincoln, A., & Ellis, R. J.
- Affiliations
- Alliant University (US)
- University of California San Diego (US)
- Corresponding author
- Ellis, Ronald J
- Venue
- Pharmacology Biochemistry and Behavior
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2001-09
- Volume
- 70
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 77-84
- ISSN
- 0091-3057 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2041955224
- Cited by
- 29
- References
- 4
- Citations by year
- 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 2
- FWCI
- 1.05
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Pharmacology Biochemistry and Behavior (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory Processes and Influences
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuropeptides and Animal Physiology
- Keywords
- opioid blockade, naltrexone, recognition memory, emotional arousal, stress-induced memory impairment, opioid peptides, emotional memory, free recall, story recall
- MeSH terms
- Adolescent, Adult, Analysis of Variance, Arousal, Double-Blind Method, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Naltrexone, Narcotic Antagonists, Recognition, Psychology
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review