Cited by 29Memory Processes and InfluencesMemory and Neural MechanismsNeuropeptides and Animal Physiology

Opioid blockade improves human recognition memory following physiological arousal

KatzenPerez, Katherine R, Jacobs, David W, Lincoln, Alan, Ellis, Ronald J·2001·Pharmacology Biochemistry and Behavior

Abstract

Rationale States of heightened emotion and arousal, such as those that may occur during crimes or traumatic accidents, can impair human memory. Animal models suggest that such memory alterations may be mediated by opioid neuropeptides. In some experimental paradigms, opioid blockade reverses memory impairments related to arousal. Objectives The present study evaluated the hypothesis that, under conditions of heightened arousal, opioid blockade would enhance memory in human subjects. Methods Memory for story information was evaluated among subjects randomized to one of four study groups (two orthogonal study conditions): (1) no arousal+no opioid blockade, (2) no arousal+opioid blockade, (3) arousal+no opioid blockade, and (4) arousal+opioid blockade. Both free recall and recognition memory were assessed. Opioid receptor blockade was achieved using a single oral dose of naltrexone. Results With heightened arousal, subjects receiving naltrexone performed better than those receiving placebo on tests of total and incidental recognition memory. In contrast, with emotionally neutral stimuli, naltrexone subjects performed worse than placebo subjects. Conclusions These findings demonstrate that opioid peptides mediate alterations in specific aspects of human memory during heightened emotional states, and help to explain why memories may be selectively deficient under conditions of stress.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0091-3057(01)00589-5

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
KatzenPerez, K. R., Jacobs, D. W., Lincoln, A., & Ellis, R. J.
Affiliations
  • Alliant University (US)
  • University of California San Diego (US)
Corresponding author
Ellis, Ronald J
Venue
Pharmacology Biochemistry and Behavior
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2001-09
Volume
70
Issue
1
Pages
77-84
ISSN
0091-3057 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2041955224
Cited by
29
References
4
Citations by year
2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 2
FWCI
1.05
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Pharmacology Biochemistry and Behavior (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory Processes and Influences
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuropeptides and Animal Physiology
Keywords
opioid blockade, naltrexone, recognition memory, emotional arousal, stress-induced memory impairment, opioid peptides, emotional memory, free recall, story recall
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Analysis of Variance, Arousal, Double-Blind Method, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Naltrexone, Narcotic Antagonists, Recognition, Psychology

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review