Cited by 58Allergic Rhinitis and SensitizationAsthma and respiratory diseasesFood Allergy and Anaphylaxis Research

Lymphocyte infiltration and thickness of the nasal mucous membrane in perennial and seasonal allergic rhinitis

Open access
Calderón, Moisés A., Lozewicz, Stefan, Prior, Andrew, Jordan, Susan, Trigg, Cecilia J., Davies, Robert J.·1994·Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology

Abstract

We have used immunocytochemical techniques to study infiltration by lymphocytes in biopsy specimens of the nasal mucosal membrane in 24 atopic patients and 10 normal volunteers. Twelve patients had perennial rhinitis and 12 had seasonal allergic rhinitis (SR) to grass pollen. Biopsy specimens were taken both in and out of the pollen season in patients with SR. Biopsy specimens were strained with the indirect immunoperoxidase technique and monoclonal antibodies to CD3, CD4, CD8, CD22, and CD25. T helper cells (CD4+) and CD24+ cells were significantly more numerous in patients exposed to allergen (those with perennial rhinitis and SR in season) compared with normal volunteers, whereas values for SR out of season were intermediate. The thickness of the nasal epithelium was significantly (p < 0.05) greater in biopsy specimens from patients with perennial rhinitis (mean, 51.43 microns) than in those from patients with SR in season (median, 32.44 microns). These results suggest that in allergic rhinitis, natural exposure to allergen is accompanied by increased infiltration of the nasal mucous membrane by T-helper and CD25+ cells.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0091-6749(94)70075-3

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Nasal epithelium is thicker in patients with AR after allergen challenge, but studies on epithelial thickness in AR without allergen challenge are conflicting.

    “Nasal epithelium is thicker in patients with AR after allergen challenge,415,416 but studies on epithelial thickness in AR without allergen challenge are conflicting.415-417”

    From International Consensus Statement on Allergy and Rhinology: Allergic Rhinitis (2018) · cites this paper as [417]

    The Results (page not available in our copy) report thicker nasal epithelium in perennial rhinitis than in seasonal rhinitis during pollen season, but the difference from healthy volunteers was not statistically significant. This supports a qualified finding about thickness without deliberate challenge. The Discussion (page not available) mentions no reduction in thickness 24 hours after allergen provocation; it does not report thickening after challenge. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 30 · Cited by 58

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. Lozewicz S, Gomez E, Chalstrey S, et al. Cellular infiltra- tion in the upper respiratory tract and the effect of allergen provocation [Abstract]. J ALLERGY CLIN IMMUNOL 1989;83:307.
  2. Yamaguchi Y, Hayashi Y, Sugama Y, et al. Highly purified murine interleukin-5 stimulates eosinophil function and prolongs in vitro survival. J Exp Med 1988;167:1737-42.
  3. Varney VA, Jacobson MR, Sudderick RM, et al. Immu- nohistology of the nasal mucosa following allergen-in- duced rhinitis. Am Rev Respir Dis 1992;146:170-6.

Authors
Calderón, M. A., Lozewicz, S., Prior, A., Jordan, S., Trigg, C. J., & Davies, R. J.
Affiliations
St Bartholomew's Hospital (GB)
Venue
Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1994-03
Volume
93
Issue
3
Pages
635-643
ISSN
0091-6749 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1977367278
Cited by
58
References
30
Citations by year
2022: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2015: 3 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 3
FWCI
1.25
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Immunology and Allergy › Allergic Rhinitis and Sensitization
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Asthma and respiratory diseases
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Immunology and Allergy › Food Allergy and Anaphylaxis Research
Keywords
allergic rhinitis, perennial allergic rhinitis, grass pollen allergy, lymphocyte infiltration, nasal mucosa, mucosal thickness, T helper cells, CD4 cells, CD25+ cells, CD3+ T cells, CD8+ T cells, allergen exposure, pollen season
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Antibodies, Monoclonal, Biopsy, Cell Movement, Female, Rhinitis, Allergic, Seasonal, T-Lymphocytes, Helper-Inducer, Humans, Lymphocytes, Male, Nasal Mucosa, Reference Values, Rhinitis, Allergic, Perennial, Receptors, Interleukin-2, CD4-CD8 Ratio

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review