Racial, ethnic, socioeconomic, and access disparities in the use of preventive services among women
Abstract
Background In this article we estimate the variations in receipt of age-appropriate preventive services among adult women between 21 and 64 years of age, by race and ethnic group, socioeconomic status, and access to health care. We also assess whether differences in access to care and socioeconomic status may explain racial and ethnic differences in the use of preventive services. Method Nationally representative data on adult women from the Medical Expenditure Panel Survey were used to estimate the effect of socioeconomic characteristics on the receipt of each preventive service. Receipt of each of four preventive services-cholesterol test, blood pressure reading, and two cancer screening tests (Papanicolaou smear, mammogram)-according to the 1996 recommendations of the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force were examined. Results An overwhelming majority of adult women (93%) had had a blood pressure reading within the last 2 years. Eighty-four percent of women had had their cholesterol checked within the last 5 years. Seventy-five percent of women had received a mammogram and 80% received Pap tests. College education, high income, usual source of care, and health insurance consistently predicted use of preventive services. These factors also explained ethnic disparities in the receipt of preventive services between Latinas and white women. Conclusions The results from our study are encouraging because only a minority of women do not receive age-appropriate preventive services.…
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
While lower SES has been associated with lower utilization of some preventive care services, the relationship between SES and utilization of preventive services with a focus on CVD prevention is less well understood, especially in a representative sample of the U.S. population.
“However, while lower SES has been associated with lower utilization of some preventive care services, the relationship between SES and utilization of preventive services with a focus on CVD prevention is less well understood, especially in a representative sample of the United States (U.S.) population [13].”
From Income disparity and utilization of cardiovascular preventive care services among U.S. adults (2021) · cites this paper as [13]
Individuals of lower socioeconomic status have been shown to be less likely to utilize or receive preventive care services such as cancer screening, vaccinations, eye examinations and dental examinations.
“Individuals of lower SES have also been shown to be less likely to utilize or receive preventive care services such as cancer screening, vaccinations, eye examinations and dental examinations [13,25].”
From Income disparity and utilization of cardiovascular preventive care services among U.S. adults (2021) · cites this paper as [13]
Cites
Social conditions as fundamental causes of disease.
Link, B. G., & Phelan, J. (1995) · Journal of Health and Social Behavior · doi:10.2307/2626958 · Cited by 5,722 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Postpartum Visit Attendance in the United States: A Systematic Review
Attanasio, L. B., Ranchoff, B. L., Cooper, M. I., & Geissler, K. H. (2022) · Women's Health Issues · doi:10.1016/j.whi.2022.02.002 · Cited by 127 · see citing works
Income disparity and utilization of cardiovascular preventive care services among U.S. adults
Shahu, A., Okunrintemi, V., Tibuakuu, M., Khan, S. U., Gulati, M., Marvel, F., Blumenthal, R. S., & Michos, E. D. (2021) · American Journal of Preventive Cardiology · doi:10.1016/j.ajpc.2021.100286 · Cited by 44 · see citing works
Factors affecting use of preventive tests for cardiovascular risk among Greeks
Pappa, E., Kontodimopoulos, N., Papadopoulos, A. A., Pallikarona, G., Niakas, D., & Tountas, Y. (2009) · International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health · doi:10.3390/ijerph6102712 · Cited by 13 · see citing works
- Authors
- Sambamoorthi, U., & McAlpine, D. D.
- Affiliations
- Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey (US)
- University of Minnesota (US)
- Corresponding author
- Sambamoorthi, Usha
- Venue
- Preventive Medicine
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2003-11
- Volume
- 37
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 475-484
- ISSN
- 0091-7435 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1968842813
- Cited by
- 305
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 4 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 15 · 2017: 16 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 19 · 2014: 19 · 2013: 24 · 2012: 19
- FWCI
- 10.15
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Preventive Medicine (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Health Promotion and Cardiovascular Prevention
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Global Cancer Incidence and Screening
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Women's cancer prevention and management
- Keywords
- preventive services, racial and ethnic disparities, socioeconomic status, health care access, women's health, cholesterol screening, blood pressure screening, mammography, Pap smear, cancer screening, health insurance, usual source of care, Hispanic women, USPSTF recommendations
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Attitude to Health, Black or African American, Cross-Cultural Comparison, Educational Status, Health Expenditures, Female, Health Services Accessibility, Health Status Indicators, Hispanic or Latino, Humans, Insurance, Health, Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice, Middle Aged, Patient Acceptance of Health Care, Preventive Health Services, Socioeconomic Factors, United States, Women, Multivariate Analysis, Logistic Models, Health Care Surveys, White People
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review