mCRY1 and mCRY2 are essential components of the negative limb of the circadian clock feedback loop
Open accessAbstract
We determined that two mouse cryptochrome genes, mCry1 and mCry2, act in the negative limb of the clock feedback loop. In cell lines, mPER proteins (alone or in combination) have modest effects on their cellular location and ability to inhibit CLOCK:BMAL1 -mediated transcription. This suggested cryptochrome involvement in the negative limb of the feedback loop. Indeed, mCry1 and mCry2 RNA levels are reduced in the central and peripheral clocks of Clock/Clock mutant mice. mCRY1 and mCRY2 are nuclear proteins that interact with each of the mPER proteins, translocate each mPER protein from cytoplasm to nucleus, and are rhythmically expressed in the suprachiasmatic circadian clock. Luciferase reporter gene assays show that mCRY1 or mCRY2 alone abrogates CLOCK:BMAL1-E box-mediated transcription. The mPER and mCRY proteins appear to inhibit the transcriptional complex differentially.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
mPER1 and mPER2 have been shown to interact in vitro and in vivo.
“As mPER1 and mPER2 have been shown to interact in vitro and in vivo (Field et al., 2000; Kume et al., 1999)”
From Nonredundant roles of the mPer1 and mPer2 genes in the mammalian circadian clock. (2001) · cites this paper as Kume et al., 1999
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 47 · Cited by 1,617
- Authors
- Kume, K., Zylka, M. J., Sriram, S., Shearman, L. P., Weaver, D. R., Jin, X., Maywood, E. S., Hastings, M. H., & Reppert, S. M.
- Affiliations
- Harvard University (US)
- University of Cambridge (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Reppert, Steven M
- ORCID
- Venue
- Cell
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 1999-07
- Volume
- 98
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 193-205
- ISSN
- 0092-8674 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1973788573
- Cited by
- 1,617
- References
- 47
- Citations by year
- 2026: 35 · 2025: 37 · 2024: 53 · 2023: 44 · 2022: 51 · 2021: 73 · 2020: 71 · 2019: 57 · 2018: 66 · 2017: 61 · 2016: 65 · 2015: 44 · 2014: 69 · 2013: 62 · 2012: 54
- FWCI
- 29.56
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Cell (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Institutes of Health (4r37hd014427-17, 5f31mh011547-02)
- National Institute of Mental Health (F32MH012067, MH11547, MH12067)
- Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (R 37 HD14427)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Endocrine and Autonomic Systems › Circadian rhythm and melatonin
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Light effects on plants
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Plant Molecular Biology Research
- Keywords
- cryptochrome, membrane-proximal external region, circadian clock, Clock/BMAL1, transcriptional repression, E-box, suprachiasmatic nucleus, nuclear translocation, Clock mutant mice, transcriptional complex
- MeSH terms
- Animals, Biological Clocks, Cell Nucleus, Cloning, Molecular, Eye Proteins, Feedback, Female, Flavoproteins, Humans, Male, Mice, Inbred BALB C, Molecular Sequence Data, Nuclear Proteins, RNA, Messenger, Suprachiasmatic Nucleus, Transcription Factors, Transcription, Genetic, Blotting, Western, Trans-Activators, Gene Expression, 3T3 Cells, Photoreceptor Cells, Invertebrate, Mice, Knockout, Cell Cycle Proteins, COS Cells, Drosophila Proteins, Receptors, G-Protein-Coupled, Mice, Basic Helix-Loop-Helix Proteins, Basic Helix-Loop-Helix Transcription Factors, CLOCK Proteins, ARNTL Transcription Factors, Cryptochromes, Period Circadian Proteins
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review