Cited by 1,617Circadian rhythm and melatoninLight effects on plantsPlant Molecular Biology Research

mCRY1 and mCRY2 are essential components of the negative limb of the circadian clock feedback loop

Open access
Kume, Kazuhiko, Zylka, Mark J, Sriram, Sathyanarayanan, Shearman, Lauren P, Weaver, David R, Jin, Xiaowei, Maywood, Elizabeth S, Hastings, Michael H +1 more·1999·Cell

Abstract

We determined that two mouse cryptochrome genes, mCry1 and mCry2, act in the negative limb of the clock feedback loop. In cell lines, mPER proteins (alone or in combination) have modest effects on their cellular location and ability to inhibit CLOCK:BMAL1 -mediated transcription. This suggested cryptochrome involvement in the negative limb of the feedback loop. Indeed, mCry1 and mCry2 RNA levels are reduced in the central and peripheral clocks of Clock/Clock mutant mice. mCRY1 and mCRY2 are nuclear proteins that interact with each of the mPER proteins, translocate each mPER protein from cytoplasm to nucleus, and are rhythmically expressed in the suprachiasmatic circadian clock. Luciferase reporter gene assays show that mCRY1 or mCRY2 alone abrogates CLOCK:BMAL1-E box-mediated transcription. The mPER and mCRY proteins appear to inhibit the transcriptional complex differentially.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0092-8674(00)81014-4

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 47 · Cited by 1,617

Authors
Kume, K., Zylka, M. J., Sriram, S., Shearman, L. P., Weaver, D. R., Jin, X., Maywood, E. S., Hastings, M. H., & Reppert, S. M.
Affiliations
  • Harvard University (US)
  • University of Cambridge (GB)
Corresponding author
Reppert, Steven M
Venue
Cell
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1999-07
Volume
98
Issue
2
Pages
193-205
ISSN
0092-8674 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1973788573
Cited by
1,617
References
47
Citations by year
2026: 35 · 2025: 37 · 2024: 53 · 2023: 44 · 2022: 51 · 2021: 73 · 2020: 71 · 2019: 57 · 2018: 66 · 2017: 61 · 2016: 65 · 2015: 44 · 2014: 69 · 2013: 62 · 2012: 54
FWCI
29.56
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Cell (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (4r37hd014427-17, 5f31mh011547-02)
  • National Institute of Mental Health (F32MH012067, MH11547, MH12067)
  • Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (R 37 HD14427)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Endocrine and Autonomic Systems › Circadian rhythm and melatonin
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Light effects on plants
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Plant Molecular Biology Research
Keywords
cryptochrome, membrane-proximal external region, circadian clock, Clock/BMAL1, transcriptional repression, E-box, suprachiasmatic nucleus, nuclear translocation, Clock mutant mice, transcriptional complex
MeSH terms
Animals, Biological Clocks, Cell Nucleus, Cloning, Molecular, Eye Proteins, Feedback, Female, Flavoproteins, Humans, Male, Mice, Inbred BALB C, Molecular Sequence Data, Nuclear Proteins, RNA, Messenger, Suprachiasmatic Nucleus, Transcription Factors, Transcription, Genetic, Blotting, Western, Trans-Activators, Gene Expression, 3T3 Cells, Photoreceptor Cells, Invertebrate, Mice, Knockout, Cell Cycle Proteins, COS Cells, Drosophila Proteins, Receptors, G-Protein-Coupled, Mice, Basic Helix-Loop-Helix Proteins, Basic Helix-Loop-Helix Transcription Factors, CLOCK Proteins, ARNTL Transcription Factors, Cryptochromes, Period Circadian Proteins

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review