Cited by 2,292Cell death mechanisms and regulationNF-κB Signaling PathwaysCancer-related Molecular Pathways

Involvement of MACH, a Novel MORT1/FADD-Interacting Protease, in Fas/APO-1- and TNF Receptor–Induced Cell Death

Open access
Boldin, Mark P, Goncharov, Tanya M, Goltseve, Yury V, Wallach, David·1996·Cell

Abstract

Fas/APO-1 and p55 tumor necrosis factor (TNF) receptor (p55-R) activate cellular mechanisms that result in cell death. Upon activation of these receptors, Fas/APO-1 binds a protein called MORT1 (or FADD) and p55-R binds a protein called TRADD. MORT1 and TRADD can also bind to each other. We have cloned a novel protein, MACH, that binds to MORT1. This protein exists in multiple isoforms, some of which contain a region that has proteolytic activity and shows marked sequence homology to proteases of the ICE/CED-3 family. Cellular expression of the proteolytic MACH isoforms results in cell death. Expression of MACH isoforms that contain an incomplete ICE/CED-3 region provides effective protection against the cytotoxicity induced by Fas/APO-1 or p55-R triggering. These findings suggest that MACH is the most upstream enzymatic component in the Fas/APO-1- and p55-R-induced cell death signaling cascades.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0092-8674(00)81265-9

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Death receptor ligation generally allows assembly of a dynamic multiprotein complex at the intracellular tail (DISC, complex I, complex II) that regulates CASP8 (or CASP10) activation.

    “As a general rule, death receptor ligation allows for the assembly of a dynamic multiprotein complex at the intracellular tail of the receptor, such as so-called “death-inducing signaling complex” (DISC), “complex I”, and “complex II”, which operate as molecular platforms to regulate the activation and functions of CASP8 (or CASP10, in a limited number of settings) [274–276].”

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 58 · Cited by 2,292

Authors
Boldin, M. P., Goncharov, T. M., Goltseve, Y. V., & Wallach, D.
Affiliations
Weizmann Institute of Science (IL)
Corresponding author
Wallach, David
Venue
Cell
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1996-06
Volume
85
Issue
6
Pages
803-815
ISSN
0092-8674 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2032417513
Cited by
2,292
References
58
Citations by year
2026: 16 · 2025: 15 · 2024: 20 · 2023: 21 · 2022: 22 · 2021: 31 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 18 · 2018: 23 · 2017: 24 · 2016: 21 · 2015: 19 · 2014: 39 · 2013: 36 · 2012: 34
FWCI
100.98
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Cell (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Weizmann Institute of Science
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Cell death mechanisms and regulation
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cancer Research › NF-κB Signaling Pathways
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer-related Molecular Pathways
Keywords
Mach, FADD, TRADD, Fas/APO-1, TNF receptor p55, apoptosis, cell death signaling, proteolytic activity, protein isoforms, death receptor signaling
MeSH terms
Amino Acid Sequence, Base Sequence, Carrier Proteins, Cell Line, Cloning, Molecular, Cysteine Endopeptidases, DNA-Binding Proteins, Humans, Kidney, Molecular Sequence Data, Organ Specificity, Protein Binding, Proteins, Recombinant Fusion Proteins, RNA, Messenger, Signal Transduction, Antigens, CD, Helminth Proteins, Apoptosis, Sequence Homology, Amino Acid, Receptors, Tumor Necrosis Factor, fas Receptor, Caspases, Caspase 1, Caenorhabditis elegans Proteins, Receptors, Tumor Necrosis Factor, Type I, TNF Receptor-Associated Factor 1, Adaptor Proteins, Signal Transducing, Fas-Associated Death Domain Protein

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review