The DOI matches its Crossref record.
ER Quality Control: The Cytoplasmic Connection
Open accessAbstract
The endoplasmic reticulum (ER) is the port of entry of membrane and secretory proteins into the central vacuolar system, which includes the ER itself, the Golgi apparatus, lysosomes, endosomes, the plasma membrane, and intermediate transport compartments. The ER is also the site where nascent secretory and membrane proteins acquire their mature tertiary and quaternary structures. “Quality control” mechanisms in the ER ensure that nascent proteins that fail to fold or to oligomerize correctly are not deployed to distal compartments of the secretory pathway and, following a lag period of variable duration, are rapidly degraded (reviewed byHammond and Helenius 1995) (Figure 1). Because this process is independent of lysosomal function and because degradation substrates can be localized to the ER region by immunocytochemistry, it has been generally assumed that the degradation occurs within the ER itself and it has been termed “ER degradation” (reviewed byKlausner and Sitia 1990). However, the abundance in the ER lumen of unfolded and partially folded polypeptide chains that are highly susceptible to proteolysis is difficult to reconcile with the presence in the same compartment of an aggressive proteolytic apparatus. Is there a proteolytic subcompartment within the ER into which misfolded substrates are segregated? How does this system distinguish proteins that are in the process of folding from those that are unable to fold? How can this system degrade integral membrane proteins which are exposed to three different compartments (lumen, cytoplasm, and membrane)?
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Hershko, A., & Ciechanover, A. (1998) · Annual Review of Biochemistry · doi:10.1146/annurev.biochem.67.1.425 · Cited by 8,840
Intracellular Functions of N-Linked Glycans
Helenius, A., & Aebi, A. M. (2001) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.291.5512.2364 · Cited by 2,405
Aggresomes: A Cellular Response to Misfolded Proteins
Johnston, J. A., Ward, C. L., & Kopito, R. R. (1998) · The Journal of Cell Biology · doi:10.1083/jcb.143.7.1883 · Cited by 2,148
Self-citationAggresomes, inclusion bodies and protein aggregation
Kopito, R. R. (2000) · Trends in Cell Biology · doi:10.1016/s0962-8924(00)01852-3 · Cited by 1,921
Self-citationA New ER Trafficking Signal Regulates the Subunit Stoichiometry of Plasma Membrane KATP Channels
Zerangue, N., Schwappach, B., Jan, Y. N., & Jan, L. Y. (1999) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/s0896-6273(00)80708-4 · Cited by 1,025
Metadata
- Authors
- Kopito, R. R.
- Venue
- Cell
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 1997-02
- Volume
- 88
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 427-430
- ISSN
- 0092-8674 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1965901600
- Cited by
- 518
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 25.26
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: ER Quality Control: The Cytoplasmic Connection. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/s0092-8674(00)81881-4
- The paper
- Kopito, R. R. (1997). ER Quality Control: The Cytoplasmic Connection. Cell. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0092-8674(00)81881-4
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.