The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Function of Trigger Factor and DnaK in Multidomain Protein Folding
Open accessAbstract
Trigger factor and DnaK protect nascent protein chains from misfolding and aggregation in the E. coli cytosol, but how these chaperones affect the mechanism of de novo protein folding is not yet understood. Upon expression under chaperone-depleted conditions, multidomain proteins such as bacterial beta-galactosidase (beta-gal) and eukaryotic luciferase fold by a rapid but inefficient default pathway, tightly coupled to translation. Trigger factor and DnaK improve the folding yield of these proteins but markedly delay the folding process both in vivo and in vitro. This effect requires the dynamic recruitment of additional trigger factor molecules to translating ribosomes. While beta-galactosidase uses this chaperone mechanism effectively, luciferase folding in E. coli remains inefficient. The efficient cotranslational domain folding of luciferase observed in the eukaryotic system is not compatible with the bacterial chaperone system. These findings suggest important differences in the coupling of translation and folding between bacterial and eukaryotic cells.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Polypeptide Flux through Bacterial Hsp70
Teter, S. A., Houry, W. A., Ang, D., Tradler, T., Rockabrand, D., Fischer, G., Blum, P., Georgopoulos, C., & Hartl, F. U. (1999) · Cell · doi:10.1016/s0092-8674(00)80787-4 · Cited by 424
Self-citationBeck, K., Wu, L., Brunner, J., & Müller, M. (2000) · The EMBO Journal · doi:10.1093/emboj/19.1.134 · Cited by 189
Cited by
Molecular chaperones in protein folding and proteostasis
Hartl, F. U., Bracher, A., & Hayer-Hartl, M. (2011) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature10317 · Cited by 3,381
Self-citationThe HSP70 chaperone machinery: J proteins as drivers of functional specificity
Kampinga, H. H., & Craig, E. A. (2010) · Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology · doi:10.1038/nrm2941 · Cited by 1,755
Proteome-wide Analysis of Chaperonin-Dependent Protein Folding in Escherichia coli
Kerner, M. J., Naylor, D. J., Ishihama, Y., Maier, T., Chang, H.-C., Stines, A. P., Georgopoulos, C., Frishman, D., Hayer-Hartl, M., Mann, M., et al. (2005) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2005.05.028 · Cited by 659
Self-citationStructural basis for protein antiaggregation activity of the trigger factor chaperone.
Saio, T., Guan, X., Rossi, P., Economou, A., & Kalodimos, C. G. (2014) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1250494 · Cited by 289
The native 3D organization of bacterial polysomes
Brandt, F., Etchells, S. A., Ortiz, J. O., Elcock, A. H., Hartl, F. U., & Baumeister, W. (2009) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2008.11.016 · Cited by 258
Metadata
- Authors
- Agashe, V. R., Guha, S., Chang, H.-C., Genevaux, P., Hayer-Hartl, M., Stemp, M., Georgopoulos, C., Hartl, F. U., & Barral, J. M.
- Venue
- Cell
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2004-04
- Volume
- 117
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 199-209
- ISSN
- 0092-8674 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1992256434
- Cited by
- 237
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 5.36
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Function of Trigger Factor and DnaK in Multidomain Protein Folding. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/s0092-8674(04)00299-5
- The paper
- Agashe, V. R., Guha, S., Chang, H.-C., Genevaux, P., Hayer-Hartl, M., Stemp, M., Georgopoulos, C., Hartl, F. U., & Barral, J. M. (2004). Function of Trigger Factor and DnaK in Multidomain Protein Folding. Cell. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0092-8674(04)00299-5
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.