VACCUM CONSTRICTION AND EXTERNAL ERECTION DEVICES IN ERECTILE DYSFUNCTION
Abstract
The development of external erection devices has evolved as the social stigma surrounding the treatment of erectile dysfunction has gradually disappeared during the late twentieth century. Although the success of surgical and medical therapy for erectile dysfunction has been documented, especially since the introduction of sildenafil citrate, patient demand for an effective, noninvasive, drug-free management of erectile dysfunction has remained. As the population continues to age, acquiring the comorbidities commonly associated with erectile dysfunction, such as hypertension, diabetes mellitus, and atherosclerotic vascular disease, the demand for such treatment should persist. This article examines the development, mechanism of action, efficacy, and patient satisfaction with regard to vacuum constriction and external erection devices.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Despite advantages such as no systemic side effects, high efficacy, low cost per treatment, the satisfaction rate of the vacuum constriction device was only about 60-80% with a significant drop-out rate.
“Despite several advantages such as no systemic side effects, high efficacy, low cost per treatment (after the initial expense for the device), the satisfaction rate of this device was only about 60-80% with a significant drop-out rate [29-31].”
From Erectile dysfunction and its pharmacology: An overview (2017) · cites this paper as [31]
No citation lists for this paper
No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.
References 37 · Cited by 90
- Authors
- Levine, L. A., & Dimitriou, R. J.
- Affiliations
- Rush University Medical Center (US)
- ORCID
- Levine, Laurence A.
- Venue
- Urologic Clinics of North America
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2001-05
- Volume
- 28
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 335-342
- ISSN
- 0094-0143 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2041309100
- Cited by
- 90
- References
- 37
- Citations by year
- 2026: 5 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 3
- FWCI
- 0.84
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Urologic Clinics of North America (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Sexual function and dysfunction studies
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Urology › Urological Disorders and Treatments
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Urology › Urinary Bladder and Prostate Research
- Keywords
- erectile dysfunction, vacuum constriction devices, vacuum systems, sildenafil citrate, mechanism of action, efficacy, patient satisfaction, comorbidities
- MeSH terms
- Constriction, Humans, Erectile Dysfunction, Male, Splints, Vacuum
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review