Cited by 44Preterm Birth and ChorioamnionitisInfant Development and Preterm CareNeonatal Respiratory Health Research

Biochemical predictors of preterm labor: fetal fibronectin and salivary estriol

Ramsey, Patrick S, Andrews, William W·2003·Clinics in Perinatology

Abstract

Preterm birth is a major complication of pregnancy and remains a leading cause of neonatal morbidity and mortality worldwide. Improvements in the authors' understanding of the pathophysiology of preterm labor have led to the development of novel diagnostic tools of use to identify women at greatest risk for preterm birth. Currently two FDA-approved biochemical tests are available in the United States: (1) fetal fibronectin and (2) salivary estriol. The presence of a positive fetal fibronectin test in the midtrimester of pregnancy is strongly associated with early spontaneous preterm birth. In contrast, a positive salivary estriol test is associated with late preterm birth, thus limiting its clinical use. Both tests have low test sensitivity and are currently used clinically for their negative predictive values. That is, women who screen negative are at very low risk for preterm birth and, thus, no interventions are indicated to prevent preterm birth. Women with a positive test are at increased risk and would be candidates for intervention. One of the main limitations of fetal fibronectin and salivary estriol, and an array of other proposed markers, is the fact that while these markers may aid in identification of women at increased risk for preterm birth, the authors currently have no clearly effective obstetric interventions for preterm-birth prevention in these high-risk women. Use of tocolytics, antimicrobials, or progesterone therapy currently has limited or unproven benefit in the management of women deemed at increased risk using these markers. Thus, until effective targeted obstetric interventions are available, the use of biochemical markers to identify women at increase risk for preterm birth remains largely research tools.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0095-5108(03)00109-x

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Salivary oestriol concentration predicts late preterm birth quite well, but is not especially useful for predicting earlier preterm births.

    “Salivary oestriol concentration predicts late preterm birth quite well, but is not especially useful for the prediction of earlier preterm births.128”

    From Epidemiology and causes of preterm birth (2008) · cites this paper as [128]

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 124 · Cited by 44

Authors
Ramsey, P. S., & Andrews, W. W.
Affiliations
University of Alabama at Birmingham (US)
Corresponding author
Ramsey, Patrick S
Venue
Clinics in Perinatology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2003-12
Volume
30
Issue
4
Pages
701-733
ISSN
0095-5108 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2140245346
Cited by
44
References
124
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 4
FWCI
0.25
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Clinics in Perinatology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Preterm Birth and Chorioamnionitis
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Infant Development and Preterm Care
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Neonatal Respiratory Health Research
Keywords
preterm birth, preterm labor, fetal fibronectin, biochemical markers, preterm birth prediction, preterm birth prevention, tocolysis, progesterone therapy, antimicrobial agents, risk stratification
MeSH terms
Estriol, Female, Fibronectins, Gestational Age, Glycoproteins, Humans, Obstetric Labor, Premature, Predictive Value of Tests, Pregnancy, Saliva, Reproducibility of Results, Biomarkers

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review