Cited by 148Library Science and Information LiteracyEducational Strategies and EpistemologiesInformation Science and Libraries

Assessing information literacy skills in the California state university: a progress report

Dunn, Kathleen·2002·The Journal of Academic Librarianship

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0099-1333(01)00281-6

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Dunn, K.
Affiliations
California State University System (US)
Corresponding author
Dunn, Kathleen
Venue
The Journal of Academic Librarianship
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2002-01
Volume
28
Issue
1-2
Pages
26-35
ISSN
0099-1333 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1999742916
Cited by
148
References
0
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 12 · 2012: 8
FWCI
37.47
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
The Journal of Academic Librarianship (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Library and Information Sciences › Library Science and Information Literacy
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Educational Strategies and Epistemologies
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Information Science and Libraries
Keywords
information literacy assessment, information literacy standards, information literacy skills, information evaluation, information seeking, California State University, student information skills

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review