The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Aggressiveness of contemporary self-etching systems
Open accessAbstract
OBJECTIVE This study examined, with the use of transmission electron microscopy (TEM), the aggressiveness of three self-etching adhesive systems in penetrating dentin smear layers of different thickness. METHODS Dentin disks were produced from extracted human third molars. For the control group, the middle dentin surface was cryofractured to create a bonding surface that was devoid of a smear layer. The experimental teeth were polished with wet 600 or 60-grit SiC paper to produce bonding surfaces with thin and thick smear layers. They were bonded using one of the three self-etching systems: Clearfil Mega Bond (Kuraray), Non-Rinse Conditioner and Prime&Bond NT (Dentsply DeTrey) and Prompt L-Pop (ESPE). Bonded specimens were then demineralized and embedded in epoxy resin for TEM examination. RESULTS For Mega Bond, thin authentic hybrid layers between 0.4-0.5 microm were found. Smear layer and smear plugs were retained as part of the hybridized complex. For Non-Rinse Conditioner/Prime&Bond NT, the authentic hybrid layers were between 1.2-2.2 microm thick. Smear layer and smear plugs were completely dissolved in dentin with thin smear layers, but were partially retained as part of the hybridized complex in those with thick smear layers. For Prompt L-Pop, authentic hybrid layers were 2.5-5 microm thick and smear layer and smear plugs were completely dissolved even in dentin with thick smear layers. SIGNIFICANCE Contemporary self-etching systems may be classified as mild, moderate and aggressive based on their ability to penetrate dentin smear layers and their depth of demineralization into the subsurface dentin. The more aggressive system completely solubilized the smear layer and smear plugs and formed hybrid layers with a thickness approaching those of phosphoric acid conditioned dentin.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Adhesive/Dentin Interface: The Weak Link in the Composite Restoration
Spencer, P., Ye, Q., Park, J., Topp, E. M., Misra, A., Marangos, O., Wang, Y., Bohaty, B. S., Singh, V., Sene, F., et al. (2010) · Annals of Biomedical Engineering · doi:10.1007/s10439-010-9969-6 · Cited by 470
Immediate bonding properties of universal adhesives to dentine
Muñoz, M. A., Luque, I., Hass, V., Reis, A., Loguercio, A. D., & Bombarda, N. H. C. (2013) · Journal of Dentistry · doi:10.1016/j.jdent.2013.03.001 · Cited by 373
Pupo, Y., Farago, P., Nadal, J., Simão, L., Esmerino, L., Gomes, O., & Gomes, J. (2014) · International Journal of Molecular Sciences · doi:10.3390/ijms15058998 · Cited by 36
Metadata
- Authors
- Tay, F. R., & Pashley, D. H.
- Venue
- Dental Materials
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2001-07
- Volume
- 17
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 296-308
- ISSN
- 0109-5641 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W48510117
- Cited by
- 650
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 35.41
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Aggressiveness of contemporary self-etching systems. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/s0109-5641(00)00087-7
- The paper
- Tay, F. R., & Pashley, D. H. (2001). Aggressiveness of contemporary self-etching systems. Dental Materials. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0109-5641(00)00087-7
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.