Cited by 19Epistemology, Ethics, and MetaphysicsSemiotics and Representation StudiesPhilosophy and Theoretical Science

The doctrine of signs

SEBEOK, T·1986·Journal of Social and Biological Systems

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0140-1750(86)90203-4

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The semiotics paradigm in its contemporary form requires a source or producer of messages communicated via some channel to a receiver or destination.

    “Akey element of the semiotics paradigm in its contemporary form is the requirement for a source or a producer of messages that are communicated via some channel to a receiver or a destination.”

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
SEBEOK, T.
Affiliations
Indiana University Bloomington (US)
Corresponding author
SEBEOK, T
Venue
Journal of Social and Biological Systems
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1986-10
Volume
9
Issue
4
Pages
345-352
ISSN
0140-1750 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2027669788
Cited by
19
References
0
Citations by year
2022: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 2
FWCI
0.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of Social and Biological Systems (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Literature and Literary Theory › Semiotics and Representation Studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Philosophy and Theoretical Science
Keywords
signs, George Berkeley, philosophy of signs, semiotics

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review