Cited by 657Cardiovascular Function and Risk FactorsHeart Failure Treatment and ManagementCardiac Imaging and Diagnostics

Prevalence of left-ventricular systolic dysfunction and heart failure in the Echocardiographic Heart of England Screening study: a population based study

Davies, MK, Hobbs, FDR, Davis, RC, Kenkre, JE, Roalfe, AK, Hare, R, Wosornu, D, Lancashire, RJ·2001·The Lancet

Abstract

Background Accurate data for prevalence rates for heart failure due to various causes, and for left-ventricular systolic dysfunction in all adults are unavailable. Our aim was to assess prevalence of left-ventricular systolic dysfunction and heart failure in a large representative adult population in England.Methods Of 6286 randomly selected patients aged 45 years and older, 3960 (63%) participated in the study. They came from 16 randomly selected general practices. We assessed patients by history and examination, electrocardiography, and echocardiography. Prevalence of left-ventricular systolic dysfunction (defined as ejection fraction <40%) and heart failure was calculated for the overall population on the basis of strict criteria and, when necessary, adjudication by a panel.Findings Left-ventricular systolic dysfunction was diagnosed in 72 (1.8% [95% CI 1.4-2.3]) participants, half of whom had no symptoms. Borderline left-ventricular function (ejection fraction 40-50%) was seen in 139 patients (3.5% [3.0-4.1]). Definite heart failure was seen in 92 (2.3%, [1.9-2.8]) and was associated with an ejection fraction of less than 40% in 38 (41%) patients, atrial fibrillation in 30 (33%), and valve disease in 24 (26%). Probable heart failure was seen in a further 32 (0.8% [0.6-1.1]) patients. In total, 124 (3.1% [2.6-3.7]) patients aged 45 years or older had definite or probable heart failure.Interpretation Heart failure is often misdiagnosed or underdiagnosed in primary care. Our results suggest that assessment of left-ventricular function in patients with suspected heart failure could lead to more effective diagnosis and treatment of this disorder.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0140-6736(01)05620-3

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 36 · Cited by 657

Authors
Davies, M., Hobbs, F., Davis, R., Kenkre, J., Roalfe, A., Hare, R., Wosornu, D., & Lancashire, R.
Affiliations
  • Selly Oak Hospital (GB)
  • University of Birmingham (GB)
Venue
The Lancet
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2001-08
Volume
358
Issue
9280
Pages
439-444
ISSN
  • 0099-5355 (ISSN-L)
  • 0140-6736
OpenAlex
W2139552008
Cited by
657
References
36
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 15 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 21 · 2015: 13 · 2014: 24 · 2013: 30 · 2012: 39
FWCI
20.33
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The Lancet (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • University of Birmingham Research Portal (University of Birmingham) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • European Society of Cardiology
  • Sistema Nacional de Investigadores
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiovascular Function and Risk Factors
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Heart Failure Treatment and Management
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Cardiac Imaging and Diagnostics
Keywords
left ventricular systolic dysfunction, heart failure, prevalence, ejection fraction, atrial fibrillation, valvular heart disease, echocardiography
MeSH terms
Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Echocardiography, England, Female, Heart Failure, Humans, Male, Mass Screening, Middle Aged, Random Allocation, Stroke Volume, Prevalence, Ventricular Dysfunction, Left

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review