Cited by 271Lipoproteins and Cardiovascular HealthAcute Myocardial Infarction ResearchCancer, Lipids, and Metabolism

Long-term effectiveness and safety of pravastatin in 9014 patients with coronary heart disease and average cholesterol concentrations: the LIPID trial follow-up

·2002·The Lancet

Abstract

Background The Long-term Intervention with Pravastatin in Ischaemic Disease (LIPID) study showed that pravastatin therapy over 6 years reduced mortality and cardiovascular events in patients with previous acute coronary syndromes and average cholesterol concentrations. We assessed the longer-term effects of initial treatment with pravastatin on further cardiovascular events and mortality over a total follow-up period of 8 years. Methods In the main trial, 9014 patients with previous myocardial infarction or unstable angina and a baseline plasma cholesterol concentration of 4.0-7.0 mmol/L were randomly assigned pravastatin 40 mg daily or placebo and followed up for 6 years. Subsequently, all patients were offered open-label pravastatin for 2 more years. Major cardiovascular events and adverse events were compared according to initial treatment assignment. Findings 7680 (97% of those still alive) had 2 years of extended follow-up. 3766 (86%) of those assigned placebo and 3914 (88%) assigned pravastatin agreed to take open-label pravastatin. During this period, patients originally assigned pravastatin had almost identical cholesterol concentrations to those assigned placebo, but a lower risk of death from all causes (219 [5.6%] vs 255 [6.8%], p=0.029), coronary heart disease (CHD) death (108 [2.8%] vs 137 [3.6%], p=0.026), and CHD death or non-fatal myocardial infarction (176 [4.5%] vs 196 [5.2%], p=0.08). Over the total 8-year period, all-cause mortality was 888 (19.7%) in the…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0140-6736(02)08351-4

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • After an average follow-up of 17 years in the DCCT follow-up trial, the original intensive-therapy treatment was associated with an absolute risk reduction of 2.8% for a composite cardiovascular end point.

    “After an average follow-up of 17 years, the original intensive-therapy treatment was associated with an absolute risk reduction of 2.8% for a composite cardiovascular end point.”
  • In the DCCT follow-up trial, glucose regulation deteriorated in the original intensive-therapy group and improved in the control group, resulting in a convergence of the glycemic levels in the two groups.

    “In the DCCT follow-up trial, glucose regulation deteriorated in the original intensive-therapy group and improved in the control group, resulting in a convergence of the glycemic levels in the two groups.”

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 32 · Cited by 271

Venue
The Lancet
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2002-04
Volume
359
Issue
9315
Pages
1379-1387
ISSN
  • 0099-5355 (ISSN-L)
  • 0140-6736
OpenAlex
W1597507340
Cited by
271
References
32
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 14 · 2015: 11 · 2014: 17 · 2013: 13 · 2012: 12
FWCI
18.10
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The Lancet (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Bristol-Myers Squibb
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Lipoproteins and Cardiovascular Health
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Acute Myocardial Infarction Research
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cancer Research › Cancer, Lipids, and Metabolism
Keywords
pravastatin, coronary artery disease, long-term statin therapy, LIPID trial, all-cause mortality, cardiovascular events, myocardial infarction, stroke, coronary heart disease mortality, hypercholesterolemia, secondary prevention, open-label extension, adverse drug reactions, drug safety, lipid-lowering therapy, acute coronary syndrome
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Angina, Unstable, Anticholesteremic Agents, Cholesterol, Coronary Disease, Double-Blind Method, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Cholesterol, LDL, Male, Middle Aged, Myocardial Infarction, Risk, Time Factors, Survival Analysis, Treatment Outcome, Pravastatin, Hydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA Reductase Inhibitors

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review