Cited by 212Asthma and respiratory diseasesAllergic Rhinitis and SensitizationOccupational exposure and asthma

Exposure to cat allergen, maternal history of asthma, and wheezing in first 5 years of life

Celedón, Juan C, Litonjua, Augusto A, Ryan, Louise, Platts-Mills, Thomas, Weiss, Scott T, Gold, Diane R·2002·The Lancet

Abstract

We looked for an association between early exposure to pets and asthma and wheezing in children whose mothers or fathers did or did not have a history of asthma. We followed up 448 children, who had at least one parent with a history of atopy, from birth to 5 years. Among children whose mothers had no history of asthma, exposure to a cat or a Fel d 1 concentration of at least 8 microg/g at the age of 2-3 months was associated with a reduced risk of wheezing between the ages of 1 and 5 years. However, among children whose mothers did have a history of asthma, such exposures were associated with an increased risk of wheezing at or after the age of 3 years. There was no association between wheezing and exposure to dog or dog allergen, and the father's allergy status had no effect on the relation between childhood wheezing and cat exposure.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0140-6736(02)09906-3

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The potential protective effects of early-life pet exposure against asthma-like symptoms appear to be closely linked to family (especially maternal) history of asthma.

    “Additionally, the potential protective effects of early-life pet exposure against asthma-like symptoms appear to be closely linked to family (especially maternal) history of asthma [165,166].”

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 5 · Cited by 212

Authors
Celedón, J. C., Litonjua, A. A., Ryan, L., Platts-Mills, T., Weiss, S. T., & Gold, D. R.
Affiliations
  • Brigham and Women's Hospital (US)
  • Harvard University (US)
Venue
The Lancet
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2002-09
Volume
360
Issue
9335
Pages
781-782
ISSN
  • 0099-5355 (ISSN-L)
  • 0140-6736
OpenAlex
W2044482869
Cited by
212
References
5
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 11 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 10 · 2012: 10
FWCI
12.41
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The Lancet (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • UTS ePRESS (University of Technology Sydney) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (KO1 HL04370-01A1, K01HL004370)
  • National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences (ES35786)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Asthma and respiratory diseases
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Immunology and Allergy › Allergic Rhinitis and Sensitization
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Occupational exposure and asthma
Keywords
cat allergen, Fel d 1, childhood wheezing, pet exposure, dog allergen, atopy, asthma risk, children under five
MeSH terms
Allergens, Animals, Asthma, Cats, Female, Humans, Immunoglobulin E, Infant, Longitudinal Studies, Respiratory Sounds, Risk Factors, Maternal Exposure

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review