Cited by 384Epilepsy research and treatmentCardiac electrophysiology and arrhythmiasCardiac pacing and defibrillation studies

Cardiac arrhythmias in focal epilepsy: a prospective long-term study

Rugg-Gunn, Fergus J, Simister, Robert J, Squirrell, Mark, Holdright, Diana R, Duncan, John S·2004·The Lancet

Abstract

Background Patients with epilepsy are at risk of sudden unexpected death. Neurogenic cardiac arrhythmias have been postulated as a cause. Electrocardiograms (ECG) can be monitored by use of an implantable loop recorder for up to 18 months. We aimed to determine the frequency of cardiac arrhythmias in patients with refractory focal seizures over an extended period.Methods 20 patients received an implantable loop recorder at one hospital in the UK. Devices were programmed to record automatically if bradycardia (<40 beats per min) or tachycardia (>140 beats per min) were detected. Additionally, in the event of a seizure, patients and relatives could initiate ECG recording with an external activator device. Data were analysed at regular intervals and correlated with seizure diaries.Findings More than 220000 patient-hours were monitored over 24 months, during which ECGs were captured on implantable loop recorders in 377 seizures. One patient withdrew from the study. In 16 patients, median heart rate during habitual seizures exceeded 100 beats per min. Ictal bradycardia (<40 beats per min) was rare, occurring in eight (2.1%) recorded events, in seven patients. Four patients (21%) had bradycardia or periods of asystole with subsequent permanent pacemaker insertion. Three of these four (16% of total) had potentially fatal asystole.Interpretation Clinical characteristics of patients with peri-ictal cardiac abnormalities are closely similar to those at greatest risk of sudden unexpected death in epilepsy. Asystole might underlie many of these deaths, which would have important implications for the investigation of similar patients and affect present cardiac-pacing policies.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0140-6736(04)17594-6

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 41 · Cited by 384

Authors
Rugg-Gunn, F. J., Simister, R. J., Squirrell, M., Holdright, D. R., & Duncan, J. S.
Affiliations
  • UCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology (GB)
  • University College Hospital at Westmoreland Street (GB)
Corresponding author
Duncan, John S
Venue
The Lancet
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2004-12
Volume
364
Issue
9452
Pages
2212-2219
ISSN
  • 0099-5355 (ISSN-L)
  • 0140-6736
OpenAlex
W2113897678
Cited by
384
References
41
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 15 · 2019: 14 · 2018: 21 · 2017: 14 · 2016: 20 · 2015: 27 · 2014: 17 · 2013: 19 · 2012: 18
FWCI
8.29
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The Lancet (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Epilepsy research and treatment
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiac electrophysiology and arrhythmias
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiac pacing and defibrillation studies
Keywords
cardiac arrhythmias, focal epilepsy, sudden unexpected death in epilepsy, ictal bradycardia, asystole, implantable loop recorder, ECG monitoring, permanent pacemaker
MeSH terms
Adult, Bradycardia, Electroencephalography, Epilepsies, Partial, Female, Heart Rate, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Pacemaker, Artificial, Electrocardiography, Ambulatory, Death, Sudden, Cardiac

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review