New strategy against Aedes aegypti in Vietnam
Abstract
The container-breeding mosquito, Aedes aegypti, is the major global vector of dengue viruses, causing around 50 million infections annually. We have developed a mosquito control strategy, incorporating four elements: (1) a combined vertical and horizontal approach that depends on community understanding; (2) prioritised control according to the larval productivity of major habitat types; (3) use of predacious copepods of the genus Mesocyclops as a biological control agent; delivered by (4) community activities of health volunteers, schools, and the public. We have previously reported that, from 1998 to 2003, community-based vector control had resulted in A aegypti elimination in six of nine communes, with only small numbers of larvae detected in the others. Here, we report eradication in two further communes and, as a result of local expansion after the project in three northern provinces, elimination from 32 of 37 communes (309730 people). As a result, no dengue cases have been detected in any commune since 2002. These findings suggest that this strategy is sustainable in Vietnam and applicable where the major sources of A aegypti are large water storage containers.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Only three studies evaluated copepods (aquatic crustaceans).
“we identified only three studies that evaluated copepods (aquatic Crustaceans) [78, 79, 103].”
From Is Dengue Vector Control Deficient in Effectiveness or Evidence?: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis (2016) · cites this paper as [103]
Empowerment strategies have been reported as effective for community-based dengue prevention and control in Cuba and elsewhere.
“Empowerment strategies have been reported as effective for community-based dengue prevention and control in Cuba [51–55] and elsewhere [56–58].”
From A modified theoretical framework to assess implementation fidelity of adaptive public health interventions (2015) · cites this paper as [57]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 30 · Cited by 248
- Authors
- Kay, B., & Nam, V. S.
- Affiliations
- QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute (AU)
- Corresponding author
- Kay, Brian
- Venue
- The Lancet
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2005-02
- Volume
- 365
- Issue
- 9459
- Pages
- 613-617
- ISSN
- 0099-5355 (ISSN-L)
- 0140-6736
- OpenAlex
- W2105980782
- Cited by
- 248
- References
- 30
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 13 · 2018: 19 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 29 · 2014: 15 · 2013: 19 · 2012: 11
- FWCI
- 14.27
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- The Lancet (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Government of the United Kingdom
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Mosquito-borne diseases and control
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Dengue and Mosquito Control Research
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Malaria Research and Control
- Keywords
- Aedes aegypti, mosquito control, dengue vector control, community-based vector control, Mesocyclops, biological control, larval productivity, water storage containers, vector eradication, dengue prevention, Vietnam
- MeSH terms
- Aedes, Animals, Dengue, Humans, Insect Vectors, Mosquito Control, Pest Control, Biological, Vietnam, Copepoda
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review