Cited by 43Multiple Sclerosis Research StudiesClinical Reasoning and Diagnostic SkillsPeripheral Neuropathies and Disorders

Misdiagnosis of multiple sclerosis and β-interferon

Open access
Poser, Charles M·1997·The Lancet

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0140-6736(05)63920-7

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Non-specific white matter lesions are common in older individuals and in those with vascular risk factors including migraine; a single periventricular lesion is not uncommon.

    “However, non-specific white matter lesions are common in older individuals and in those with vascular risk factors including migraine; a single periventricular lesion is not uncommon. 16”

    From Diagnosis of multiple sclerosis: 2017 revisions of the McDonald criteria (2018) · cites this paper as [16]

    In “Misdiagnosis of multiple sclerosis and β-interferon” (page unavailable), Poser says many conditions cause MRI lesions that mimic multiple sclerosis, supporting the general caution about nonspecific lesions. Our copy does not say that such lesions are common in older people or those with vascular risk factors, characterize migraine as a vascular risk factor, or address how common a single periventricular lesion is. (LLM, conf=0.77)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • A 1997 study of 366 patients with a diagnosis of MS referred for a second opinion to Charles Poser found 130 misdiagnosed patients, including 28 (22%) with chronic fatigue syndrome and eight (6%) with 'psychiatric disorder' or 'post-traumatic syndrome'.

    “A 1997 study of 366 patients with a diagnosis of MS referred for a second opinion to Charles Poser found 130 misdiagnosed patients, including 28 (22%) with chronic fatigue syndrome and eight (6%) with “psychiatric disorder” or “post-traumatic syndrome” [32].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Poser, C. M.
Affiliations
Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center (US)
Corresponding author
Poser, Charles M
Venue
The Lancet
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1997-06
Volume
349
Issue
9069
Pages
1916
ISSN
  • 0099-5355 (ISSN-L)
  • 0140-6736
OpenAlex
W2005150154
Cited by
43
References
0
Citations by year
2024: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 2 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 1
FWCI
0.72
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • The Lancet (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pathology and Forensic Medicine › Multiple Sclerosis Research Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Family Practice › Clinical Reasoning and Diagnostic Skills
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Neurology › Peripheral Neuropathies and Disorders
Keywords
multiple sclerosis, misdiagnosis, interferon-beta, interferon therapy, second opinion, magnetic resonance imaging, differential diagnosis, disseminated encephalomyelitis, chronic fatigue syndrome, myelopathy, post-traumatic syndrome, complicated migraine, mental illness, diagnostic criteria, overprescribing, cost-effectiveness
MeSH terms
Diagnostic Errors, Humans, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Multiple Sclerosis, Interferon-beta

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review