Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 264

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 34 of the 34 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Identification of diagnostic markers for tuberculosis by proteomic fingerprinting of serum

Open access
Agranoff, Dan, Fernandez-Reyes, Delmiro, Papadopoulos, Marios C, Rojas, Sergio A, Herbster, Mark, Loosemore, Alison, Tarelli, Edward, Sheldon, Jo, Schwenk, Achim, Pollok, Richard, Rayner, Charlotte FJ, Krishna, Sanjeev·2006·The Lancet

Abstract

Background We investigated the potential of proteomic fingerprinting with mass spectrometric serum profiling, coupled with pattern recognition methods, to identify biomarkers that could improve diagnosis of tuberculosis. Methods We obtained serum proteomic profiles from patients with active tuberculosis and controls by surface-enhanced laser desorption ionisation time of flight mass spectrometry. A supervised machine-learning approach based on the support vector machine (SVM) was used to obtain a classifier that distinguished between the groups in two independent test sets. We used k-fold cross validation and random sampling of the SVM classifier to assess the classifier further. Relevant mass peaks were selected by correlational analysis and assessed with SVM. We tested the diagnostic potential of candidate biomarkers, identified by peptide mass fingerprinting, by conventional immunoassays and SVM classifiers trained on these data. Findings Our SVM classifier discriminated the proteomic profile of patients with active tuberculosis from that of controls with overlapping clinical features. Diagnostic accuracy was 94% (sensitivity 93·5%, specificity 94·9%) for patients with tuberculosis and was unaffected by HIV status. A classifier trained on the 20 most informative peaks achieved diagnostic accuracy of 90%. From these peaks, two peptides (serum amyloid A protein and transthyretin) were identified and quantitated by immunoassay. Because these peptides reflect inflammatory states, we also quantitated neopterin and C reactive protein. Application of an SVM classifier using combinations of these values gave diagnostic accuracies of up to 84% for tuberculosis. Validation on a second, prospectively collected testing set gave similar accuracies using the whole proteomic signature and the 20 selected peaks. Using combinations of the four biomarkers, we achieved diagnostic accuracies of up to 78%. Interpretation The potential biomarkers for tuberculosis that we identified through proteomic fingerprinting and pattern recognition have a plausible biological connection with the disease and could be used to develop new diagnostic tests.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0140-6736(06)69342-2

Cites

34 of 34 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 34 references

Cited by

See all 264

Metadata

Authors
Agranoff, D., Fernandez-Reyes, D., Papadopoulos, M. C., Rojas, S. A., Herbster, M., Loosemore, A., Tarelli, E., Sheldon, J., Schwenk, A., Pollok, R., Rayner, C. F., & Krishna, S.
Venue
The Lancet
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2006-09
Volume
368
Issue
9540
Pages
1012-1021
ISSN
  • 0099-5355 (ISSN-L)
  • 0140-6736
OpenAlex
W2155369224
Cited by
264
References
34
FWCI
10.90
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Identification of diagnostic markers for tuberculosis by proteomic fingerprinting of serum. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/s0140-6736(06)69342-2
The paper
Agranoff, D., Fernandez-Reyes, D., Papadopoulos, M. C., Rojas, S. A., Herbster, M., Loosemore, A., Tarelli, E., Sheldon, J., Schwenk, A., Pollok, R., Rayner, C. F., & Krishna, S. (2006). Identification of diagnostic markers for tuberculosis by proteomic fingerprinting of serum. The Lancet. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0140-6736(06)69342-2

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.