Changes in sexual behaviours to prevent HIV
Open accessIntegrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Overconfidence or lack of information about condom effectiveness can lead teens to underestimate the risks they are taking.
“This overconfidence or lack of information can lead teens to underestimate the risks they are taking [62].”
From Relationships, love and sexuality: what the Filipino teens think and feel (2009) · cites this paper as [62]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 10 · Cited by 13
- Authors
- de Irala, J., & Alonso, A.
- Venue
- The Lancet
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2006-11
- Volume
- 368
- Issue
- 9549
- Pages
- 1749-1750
- ISSN
- 0099-5355 (ISSN-L)
- 0140-6736
- OpenAlex
- W2114416184
- Cited by
- 13
- References
- 10
- Citations by year
- 2022: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2015: 1 · 2012: 1
- FWCI
- 1.02
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- hdl.handle.net
- Licence
- Locations
- The Lancet (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Deposito Adademico Digital Universidad De Navarra (University of Navarra) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- DigitalGeorgetown (Georgetown University Library) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › HIV/AIDS Research and Interventions
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › HIV, Drug Use, Sexual Risk
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Adolescent Sexual and Reproductive Health
- Keywords
- HIV prevention, sexual behavior, women, multiple sexual partners, risk compensation, sub-Saharan Africa, HIV transmission risk factors, HIV prevention strategies
- MeSH terms
- Attitude to Health, Female, Health Surveys, Humans, Risk Factors, Sexual Behavior, HIV Infections, Condoms, Africa South of the Sahara
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review