Cited by 2,133Child Nutrition and Water AccessGlobal Maternal and Child HealthPoverty, Education, and Child Welfare

Child development: risk factors for adverse outcomes in developing countries

Walker, Susan P, Wachs, Theodore D, Meeks Gardner, Julie, Lozoff, Betsy, Wasserman, Gail A, Pollitt, Ernesto, Carter, Julie A·2007·The Lancet

Abstract

Poverty and associated health, nutrition, and social factors prevent at least 200 million children in developing countries from attaining their developmental potential. We review the evidence linking compromised development with modifiable biological and psychosocial risks encountered by children from birth to 5 years of age. We identify four key risk factors where the need for intervention is urgent: stunting, inadequate cognitive stimulation, iodine deficiency, and iron deficiency anaemia. The evidence is also sufficient to warrant interventions for malaria, intrauterine growth restriction, maternal depression, exposure to violence, and exposure to heavy metals. We discuss the research needed to clarify the effect of other potential risk factors on child development. The prevalence of the risk factors and their effect on development and human potential are substantial. Furthermore, risks often occur together or cumulatively, with concomitant increased adverse effects on the development of the world's poorest children.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0140-6736(07)60076-2

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 144 · Cited by 2,133

Authors
Walker, S. P., Wachs, T. D., Meeks Gardner, J., Lozoff, B., Wasserman, G. A., Pollitt, E., & Carter, J. A.
Affiliations
  • University of the West Indies (JM)
  • Purdue University West Lafayette (US)
  • University of Michigan (US)
  • Columbia University (US)
  • University of California, Davis (US)
  • University College London (GB)
Venue
The Lancet
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2007-01
Volume
369
Issue
9556
Pages
145-157
ISSN
  • 0099-5355 (ISSN-L)
  • 0140-6736
OpenAlex
W2171112462
Cited by
2,133
References
144
Citations by year
2026: 59 · 2025: 82 · 2024: 79 · 2023: 111 · 2022: 117 · 2021: 160 · 2020: 167 · 2019: 109 · 2018: 127 · 2017: 130 · 2016: 151 · 2015: 135 · 2014: 119 · 2013: 122 · 2012: 102
FWCI
10.04
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The Lancet (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • UNICEF
  • National Institutes of Health
  • Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (P42 TS010349-06)
  • National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Child Nutrition and Water Access
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Global Maternal and Child Health
  • Social Sciences › Safety Research › Poverty, Education, and Child Welfare
Keywords
child development, developmental risk factors, poverty, stunting, cognitive stimulation, iodine deficiency, iron deficiency anemia, malaria, fetal growth restriction, maternal depression, violence exposure, heavy metals, cumulative risk, developing countries
MeSH terms
Child Development, Child, Preschool, Cognition, Communicable Diseases, Developing Countries, Fetal Growth Retardation, Growth Disorders, Humans, Infant, Infant, Newborn, Poverty, Psychosocial Deprivation, Risk Factors, Violence, Parenting, Malnutrition

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review