Safety of the RTS,S/AS02D candidate malaria vaccine in infants living in a highly endemic area of Mozambique: a double blind randomised controlled phase I/IIb trial
Abstract
Background Malaria remains a leading global health problem that requires the improved use of existing interventions and the accelerated development of new control methods. We aimed to assess the safety, immunogenicity, and initial efficacy of the malaria vaccine RTS,S/AS02D in infants in Africa. Methods We did a phase I/IIb double-blind randomised trial of 214 infants in Mozambique. Infants were randomly assigned to receive three doses either of RTS,S/AS02D or the hepatitis B vaccine Engerix-B at ages 10 weeks, 14 weeks, and 18 weeks of age, as well as routine immunisation vaccines given at 8, 12, and 16 weeks of age. The primary endpoint was safety of the RTS,S/AS02D during the first 6 months of the study, and analysis was by intention to treat. Secondary endpoints included immunogenicity and analysis of new Plasmodium falciparum infections during a 3-month follow up after the third dose. Time to new infections in the per-protocol cohort were compared between groups using Cox regression models. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00197028. Findings There were 17 children (15.9%; 95% CI 9.5-24.2) with serious adverse events in each group. In the follow-up which ended on March 6, 2007, there were 31 serious adverse events in the RTS,S/AS02D group and 30 serious adverse events in the Engerix-B group, none of which were reported as related to vaccination. There were four deaths during this same follow-up period; all of them after the active detection of i…
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The protective effect of RTS,S was confirmed in infants from Mozambique.
“The protective effect of RTS,S was confirmed in infants from Mozambique (Aponte et al. , 2007).”
From Towards a vaccine against pregnancy-associated malaria (2008) · cites this paper as Aponte et al., 2007
No citation lists for this paper
No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.
References 13 · Cited by 279
- Authors
- Aponte, J. J., Aide, P., Renom, M., Mandomando, I., Bassat, Q., Sacarlal, J., Manaca, M. N., Lafuente, S., Barbosa, A., Leach, A., Lievens, M., Vekemans, J., Sigauque, B., Dubois, M.-C., Demoitié, M.-A., Sillman, M., Savarese, B., McNeil, J. G., Macete, E., Ballou, W. R., Cohen, J., & Alonso, P. L.
- Affiliations
- Manhiça Health Research Centre (MZ)
- Eduardo Mondlane University (MZ)
- Universitat de Barcelona (ES)
- GlaxoSmithKline (Belgium) (BE)
- Corresponding author
- Alonso, Pedro L
- ORCID
- Venue
- The Lancet
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2007-11
- Volume
- 370
- Issue
- 9598
- Pages
- 1543-1551
- ISSN
- 0099-5355 (ISSN-L)
- 0140-6736
- OpenAlex
- W2107181087
- Cited by
- 279
- References
- 13
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 12 · 2014: 17 · 2013: 15 · 2012: 20
- FWCI
- 42.90
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- The Lancet (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Malaria Research and Control
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Travel-related health issues
- Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Microbiology › Bacterial Infections and Vaccines
- Keywords
- malaria vaccine, Plasmodium falciparum, vaccine safety, vaccine immunogenicity, vaccine efficacy, infants, circumsporozoite protein, serious adverse events, malaria endemic areas, Mozambique, malaria control, vaccine hesitancy
- MeSH terms
- Animals, Antibodies, Protozoan, Double-Blind Method, Female, Humans, Immunization Schedule, Infant, Malaria, Male, Mozambique, Plasmodium falciparum, Malaria Vaccines
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review