Effect of fenofibrate on amputation events in people with type 2 diabetes mellitus (FIELD study): a prespecified analysis of a randomised controlled trial
Open accessAbstract
Background Amputations in people with type 2 diabetes mellitus substantially impair their quality of life and impose high costs on health-care systems. Our aim was to assess the effect of fenofibrate on amputation events in a large cohort of patients with type 2 diabetes.Methods In the Fenofibrate Intervention and Event Lowering in Diabetes (FIELD) study, 9795 patients aged 50-75 years with type 2 diabetes were randomly assigned by computer-generated randomisation sequence to receive fenofibrate 200 mg per day (n=4895) or matching placebo (n=4900) for 5 years' duration. Information about non-traumatic amputation-a prespecified tertiary endpoint of the study-was routinely gathered. Clinicians who were masked to treatment allocation adjudicated amputations as minor or major (below or above the ankle, respectively). Amputations were also classified on the basis of whether or not large-vessel disease was present in the limb, to distinguish those related to large-artery atherosclerosis from those predominantly related to microvascular disease. Analysis was by intention to treat (ITT). The FIELD study is registered as an International Standard Randomised Controlled Trial, number ISRCTN64783481.Findings All 9795 patients were included in the ITT population. 115 patients had one or more non-traumatic lower-limb amputations due to diabetes. Previous cardiovascular disease, microvascular disease, previous non-traumatic amputation or skin ulcer, smoking, and longer duration of diabetes were more frequent in patients who had amputations during the trial than in those who had other cardiovascular events or in those who had neither event (all p<0.001 for three-way comparison). Mean lipid concentrations differed between patients who had on-study amputations and those who had other cardiovascular events or neither event, but by no more than 0.2 mmol/L. The risks of first amputation (45 vs 70 events; hazard ratio [HR] 0.64, 95% CI 0.44-0.94; p=0.02) and minor amputation events without known large-vessel disease (18 vs 34 events; 0.53, 0.30-0.94; p=0.027) were lower for patients assigned to fenofibrate than for patients assigned to placebo, with no difference between groups in risk of major amputations (24 vs 26 events; 0.93, 0.53-1.62; p=0.79).Interpretation Classic markers of macrovascular and microvascular risk were associated with lower extremity amputations in patients with type 2 diabetes. Treatment with fenofibrate was associated with a lower risk of amputations, particularly minor amputations without known large-vessel disease, probably through non-lipid mechanisms. These findings could lead to a change in standard treatment for the prevention of diabetes-related lower-limb amputations.Funding Laboratoires Fournier SA (now part of Solvay Pharmaceuticals) and National Health and Medical Research Council of Australia.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In FIELD, fenofibrate had significant beneficial effects on lower limb amputations, including in instances regarded as having a predominantly microvascular aetiology.
“In FIELD, there was evidence that fenofibrate had significant beneficial effects on laser treatment for diabetic retinopathy [4] and lower limb amputations, including in instances regarded as having a predominantly microvascular aetiology [5].”
Decreasing glomerular filtration rate is associated with increased cardiovascular disease risk, independent of other cardiovascular risk factors.
“In the adult population, decreasing GFR is associated with increased CVD risk, independent of other CV risk factors [489-492].”
From 2019 ESC/EAS guidelines for the management of dyslipidaemias: lipid modification to reduce cardiovascular risk (2019) · cites this paper as [492]
Chronic kidney disease is associated with increased risk of both atherosclerotic vascular disease and structural heart disease.
“There is an increased risk of both atherosclerotic vascular disease and structural heart disease [492].”
From 2019 ESC/EAS guidelines for the management of dyslipidaemias: lipid modification to reduce cardiovascular risk (2019) · cites this paper as [492]
For patients with diabetes mellitus and statin therapy, fibrates have not been shown to provide any further reduction of risk.
“For patients with diabetes mellitus and statin therapy, fibrates have not been shown to provide any further reduction of risk [87–89].”
From HDL cholesterol: reappraisal of its clinical relevance (2017) · cites this paper as [89]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 44 · Cited by 328
Research works printed but not linked: 2
- [11]Harrell F Lee KL Verifying assumptions of the Cox proportional hazards model Proceedings of the 11th Annual SAS User's Group International Conference 1986 SAS Institute Cary, NC 823 828
- [34]Gordois A Scuffham P Shearer A Oglesby A The health care costs of diabetic peripheral neuropathy in the UK The Diabetic Foot 6 2003 62 73 http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_m0MDQ/is_2_6/ai_107836467/?tag=content;col1 (accessed April 30, 2009). 12766111
- Authors
- Rajamani, K., Colman, P. G., Li, L. P., Best, J. D., Voysey, M., D'Emden, M. C., Laakso, M., Baker, J. R., & Keech, A. C.
- Affiliations
- The University of Sydney (AU)
- The Royal Melbourne Hospital (AU)
- The University of Melbourne (AU)
- University of Eastern Finland (FI)
- Middlemore Hospital (NZ)
- Venue
- The Lancet
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2009-05
- Volume
- 373
- Issue
- 9677
- Pages
- 1780-1788
- ISSN
- 0099-5355 (ISSN-L)
- 0140-6736
- PMC
- PMC2687887
- OpenAlex
- W2118860915
- Cited by
- 328
- References
- 44
- Citations by year
- 2026: 11 · 2025: 17 · 2024: 19 · 2023: 18 · 2022: 16 · 2021: 20 · 2020: 23 · 2019: 18 · 2018: 14 · 2017: 16 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 15 · 2014: 23 · 2013: 23 · 2012: 20
- FWCI
- 20.36
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- The Lancet (publishedVersion)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Diabetes Australia
- National Heart Foundation of Australia
- Diabetesliitto
- Medical Research Council
- National Health and Medical Research Council
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetic Foot Ulcer Assessment and Management
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Peripheral Artery Disease Management
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and Lipoproteins
- Keywords
- fenofibrate, type 2 diabetes, non-traumatic amputation, lower limb amputation, fieldwork, large artery atherosclerosis, microangiopathy, lipid-lowering therapy, cardiovascular risk, minor amputation, major amputation, amputation risk, skin ulcers, smoking, diabetes duration, cardiovascular events, quality of life
- MeSH terms
- Aged, Amputation, Surgical, Hypolipidemic Agents, Body Height, Cardiovascular Diseases, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Hyperlipidemias, Male, Middle Aged, Fenofibrate, Risk Factors, Multivariate Analysis, Proportional Hazards Models, Treatment Outcome, Age Distribution, Risk Assessment, Risk Reduction Behavior
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review