Cited by 328Diabetic Foot Ulcer Assessment and ManagementPeripheral Artery Disease ManagementDiabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and Lipoproteins

Effect of fenofibrate on amputation events in people with type 2 diabetes mellitus (FIELD study): a prespecified analysis of a randomised controlled trial

Open access
Rajamani, Kushwin, Colman, Peter G, Li, Li Ping, Best, James D, Voysey, Merryn, D'Emden, Michael C, Laakso, Markku, Baker, John R +1 more·2009·The Lancet

Abstract

Background Amputations in people with type 2 diabetes mellitus substantially impair their quality of life and impose high costs on health-care systems. Our aim was to assess the effect of fenofibrate on amputation events in a large cohort of patients with type 2 diabetes.Methods In the Fenofibrate Intervention and Event Lowering in Diabetes (FIELD) study, 9795 patients aged 50-75 years with type 2 diabetes were randomly assigned by computer-generated randomisation sequence to receive fenofibrate 200 mg per day (n=4895) or matching placebo (n=4900) for 5 years' duration. Information about non-traumatic amputation-a prespecified tertiary endpoint of the study-was routinely gathered. Clinicians who were masked to treatment allocation adjudicated amputations as minor or major (below or above the ankle, respectively). Amputations were also classified on the basis of whether or not large-vessel disease was present in the limb, to distinguish those related to large-artery atherosclerosis from those predominantly related to microvascular disease. Analysis was by intention to treat (ITT). The FIELD study is registered as an International Standard Randomised Controlled Trial, number ISRCTN64783481.Findings All 9795 patients were included in the ITT population. 115 patients had one or more non-traumatic lower-limb amputations due to diabetes. Previous cardiovascular disease, microvascular disease, previous non-traumatic amputation or skin ulcer, smoking, and longer duration of diabetes were more frequent in patients who had amputations during the trial than in those who had other cardiovascular events or in those who had neither event (all p<0.001 for three-way comparison). Mean lipid concentrations differed between patients who had on-study amputations and those who had other cardiovascular events or neither event, but by no more than 0.2 mmol/L. The risks of first amputation (45 vs 70 events; hazard ratio [HR] 0.64, 95% CI 0.44-0.94; p=0.02) and minor amputation events without known large-vessel disease (18 vs 34 events; 0.53, 0.30-0.94; p=0.027) were lower for patients assigned to fenofibrate than for patients assigned to placebo, with no difference between groups in risk of major amputations (24 vs 26 events; 0.93, 0.53-1.62; p=0.79).Interpretation Classic markers of macrovascular and microvascular risk were associated with lower extremity amputations in patients with type 2 diabetes. Treatment with fenofibrate was associated with a lower risk of amputations, particularly minor amputations without known large-vessel disease, probably through non-lipid mechanisms. These findings could lead to a change in standard treatment for the prevention of diabetes-related lower-limb amputations.Funding Laboratoires Fournier SA (now part of Solvay Pharmaceuticals) and National Health and Medical Research Council of Australia.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0140-6736(09)60698-x

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 44 · Cited by 328

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. [11]Harrell F Lee KL Verifying assumptions of the Cox proportional hazards model Proceedings of the 11th Annual SAS User's Group International Conference 1986 SAS Institute Cary, NC 823 828
  2. [34]Gordois A Scuffham P Shearer A Oglesby A The health care costs of diabetic peripheral neuropathy in the UK The Diabetic Foot 6 2003 62 73 http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_m0MDQ/is_2_6/ai_107836467/?tag=content;col1 (accessed April 30, 2009). 12766111

Authors
Rajamani, K., Colman, P. G., Li, L. P., Best, J. D., Voysey, M., D'Emden, M. C., Laakso, M., Baker, J. R., & Keech, A. C.
Affiliations
  • The University of Sydney (AU)
  • The Royal Melbourne Hospital (AU)
  • The University of Melbourne (AU)
  • University of Eastern Finland (FI)
  • Middlemore Hospital (NZ)
Venue
The Lancet
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2009-05
Volume
373
Issue
9677
Pages
1780-1788
ISSN
  • 0099-5355 (ISSN-L)
  • 0140-6736
OpenAlex
W2118860915
Cited by
328
References
44
Citations by year
2026: 11 · 2025: 17 · 2024: 19 · 2023: 18 · 2022: 16 · 2021: 20 · 2020: 23 · 2019: 18 · 2018: 14 · 2017: 16 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 15 · 2014: 23 · 2013: 23 · 2012: 20
FWCI
20.36
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • The Lancet (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Diabetes Australia
  • National Heart Foundation of Australia
  • Diabetesliitto
  • Medical Research Council
  • National Health and Medical Research Council
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetic Foot Ulcer Assessment and Management
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Peripheral Artery Disease Management
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and Lipoproteins
Keywords
fenofibrate, type 2 diabetes, non-traumatic amputation, lower limb amputation, fieldwork, large artery atherosclerosis, microangiopathy, lipid-lowering therapy, cardiovascular risk, minor amputation, major amputation, amputation risk, skin ulcers, smoking, diabetes duration, cardiovascular events, quality of life
MeSH terms
Aged, Amputation, Surgical, Hypolipidemic Agents, Body Height, Cardiovascular Diseases, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Hyperlipidemias, Male, Middle Aged, Fenofibrate, Risk Factors, Multivariate Analysis, Proportional Hazards Models, Treatment Outcome, Age Distribution, Risk Assessment, Risk Reduction Behavior

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review