CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 497Global Maternal and Child HealthMaternal and Neonatal HealthcareChild Nutrition and Water Access

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 22 of the 22 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Effect of a participatory intervention with women's groups on birth outcomes and maternal depression in Jharkhand and Orissa, India: a cluster-randomised controlled trial

Open access
Tripathy, Prasanta, Nair, Nirmala, Barnett, Sarah, Mahapatra, Rajendra, Borghi, Josephine, Rath, Shibanand, Rath, Suchitra, Gope, Rajkumar, Mahto, Dipnath, Sinha, Rajesh, Lakshminarayana, Rashmi, Patel, Vikram, Pagel, Christina, Prost, Audrey, Costello, Anthony·2010·The Lancet
DOI 10.1016/s0140-6736(09)62042-0
Open this paper in CoChat — free accountOpen PDF

Abstract

Background Community mobilisation through participatory women's groups might improve birth outcomes in poor rural communities. We therefore assessed this approach in a largely tribal and rural population in three districts in eastern India.Methods From 36 clusters in Jharkhand and Orissa, with an estimated population of 228 186, we assigned 18 clusters to intervention or control using stratified randomisation. Women were eligible to participate if they were aged 15-49 years, residing in the project area, and had given birth during the study. In intervention clusters, a facilitator convened 13 groups every month to support participatory action and learning for women, and facilitated the development and implementation of strategies to address maternal and newborn health problems. The primary outcomes were reductions in neonatal mortality rate (NMR) and maternal depression scores. Analysis was by intention to treat. This trial is registered as an International Standard Randomised Controlled Trial, number ISRCTN21817853.Findings After baseline surveillance of 4692 births, we monitored outcomes for 19 030 births during 3 years (2005-08). NMRs per 1000 were 55.6, 37.1, and 36.3 during the first, second, and third years, respectively, in intervention clusters, and 53.4, 59.6, and 64.3, respectively, in control clusters. NMR was 32% lower in intervention clusters adjusted for clustering, stratification, and baseline differences (odds ratio 0.68, 95% CI 0.59-0.78) during the 3 years, and 45% lower in years 2 and 3 (0.55, 0.46-0.66). Although we did not note a significant effect on maternal depression overall, reduction in moderate depression was 57% in year 3 (0.43, 0.23-0.80).Interpretation This intervention could be used with or as a potential alternative to health-worker-led interventions, and presents new opportunities for policy makers to improve maternal and newborn health outcomes in poor populations.Funding Health Foundation, UK Department for International Development, Wellcome Trust, and the Big Lottery Fund (UK).

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0140-6736(09)62042-0

Cites

22 of 22 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 22 references

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 401–497 of 497

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Tripathy, P., Nair, N., Barnett, S., Mahapatra, R., Borghi, J., Rath, S., Rath, S., Gope, R., Mahto, D., Sinha, R., Lakshminarayana, R., Patel, V., Pagel, C., Prost, A., & Costello, A.
Affiliations
  • Ekjut (IN)
  • University College London (GB)
  • London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine (GB)
  • Effective Intervention (GB)
Corresponding author
Tripathy, Prasanta
ORCID
Venue
The Lancet
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2010-04
Volume
375
Issue
9721
Pages
1182-1192
ISSN
  • 0099-5355 (ISSN-L)
  • 0140-6736
DOI
10.1016/s0140-6736(09)62042-0
OpenAlex
W2154971619
Cited by
497
References
22
Citations by year
2026: 12 · 2025: 20 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 29 · 2022: 24 · 2021: 21 · 2020: 31 · 2019: 30 · 2018: 33 · 2017: 34 · 2016: 40 · 2015: 36 · 2014: 45 · 2013: 40 · 2012: 32
FWCI
37.31
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
Locations
  • The Lancet (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
  • LSHTM Research Online (London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Wellcome Trust (091834)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Global Maternal and Child Health
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Maternal and Neonatal Healthcare
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Child Nutrition and Water Access
Keywords
community mobilization, neonatal mortality, maternal depression, birth outcomes, maternal and newborn health, Jharkhand, Odisha, participatory action learning
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Community Participation, Developing Countries, Female, Health Education, Home Childbirth, Humans, India, Infant Mortality, Infant, Newborn, Maternal Mortality, Middle Aged, Pregnancy, Prenatal Care, Rural Population, Socioeconomic Factors, Women, Depression, Postpartum, Delivery, Obstetric, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review