Cited by 335HIV/AIDS Research and InterventionsHIV/AIDS drug development and treatmentReproductive tract infections research

The DOI matches its Crossref record; the references it cites are not checked yet.

PRO2000 vaginal gel for prevention of HIV-1 infection (Microbicides Development Programme 301): a phase 3, randomised, double-blind, parallel-group trial.

Open access

Abstract

Background Innovative prevention strategies for HIV-1 transmission are urgently needed. PRO2000 vaginal gel was efficacious against HIV-1 transmission in studies in macaques; we aimed to assess efficacy and safety of 2% and 0·5% PRO2000 gels against vaginal HIV-1 transmission in women in sub-Saharan Africa.Methods Microbicides Development Programme 301 was a phase 3, randomised, double-blind, parallel-group trial, undertaken at 13 clinics in South Africa, Tanzania, Uganda, and Zambia. We randomly assigned sexually active women, aged 18 years or older (≥16 years in Tanzania and Uganda) without HIV-1 infection in a 1:1:1 ratio to 2% PRO2000, 0·5% PRO2000, or placebo gel groups for 52 weeks (up to 104 weeks in Uganda). Randomisation was done by computerised random number generator. Investigators and participants were masked to group assignment. The primary efficacy outcome was incidence of HIV-1 infection before week 52, which was censored for pregnancy and excluded participants without HIV-1 follow-up data or with HIV-1 infection at enrolment. HIV-1 status was established by rapid tests or ELISA at screening at 12 weeks, 24 weeks, 40 weeks, and 52 weeks, and confirmed in a central reference laboratory. The primary safety endpoint was an adverse event of grade 3 or worse. Use of 2% PRO2000 gel was discontinued on Feb 14, 2008, on the recommendation of the Independent Data Monitoring Committee because of low probability of benefit. This trial is registered at http://isrctn.org, number ISRCTN 64716212.Findings We enrolled 9385 of 15 818 women screened. 2591 (95%) of 2734 participants enrolled to the 2% PRO2000 group, 3156 (95%) of 3326 in the 0·5% PRO2000 group, and 3112 (94%) of 3325 in the placebo group were included in the primary efficacy analysis. Mean reported gel use at last sex act was 89% (95% CI 86-91). HIV-1 incidence was much the same between groups at study end (incidence per 100 woman-years was 4·5 [95% CI 3·8-5·4] for 0·5% PRO2000 vs 4·3 [3·6-5·2] for placebo, hazard ratio 1·05 [0·82-1·34], p=0·71), and at discontinuation (4·7 [3·8-5·8] for 2% PRO2000 gel, 3·9 [3·0-4·9] for 0·5% PRO2000 gel, and 3·9 [3·1-5·0] for placebo gel). Incidence of the primary safety endpoint at study end was 4·6 per 100 woman-years (95% CI 3·9-5·4) in the 0·5% PRO2000 group and 3·9 (3·2-4·6) in the placebo group; and was 4·5 (3·7-5·5) in the 2% PRO2000 group at discontinuation.Interpretation Although safe, 0·5% PRO2000 and 2% PRO2000 are not efficacious against vaginal HIV-1 transmission and are not indicated for this use.Funding UK Department for International Development, UK Medical Research Council, European and Developing Countries Clinical Trials Partnership, International Partnership for Microbicides, and Endo Pharmaceuticals Solutions.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0140-6736(10)61086-0

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 24 · Cited by 335

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Abdool Karim SS, Coletti A, Richardson B, et al. Safety and effectiveness of vaginal microbicides buffer gel and 0.5% PRO 2000/5 gel for the prevention of HIV infection in women: results of the HPTN 035 trial. 16th Conference on Retroviruses and Opportunistic Infections; Montreal, Canada; Feb 8–11, 2009. (abstr 48LB).

Metadata

Authors
McCormack, S., Ramjee, G., Kamali, A., Rees, H., Crook, A. M., Gafos, M., Jentsch, U., Pool, R., Chisembele, M., Kapiga, S., Mutemwa, R., Vallely, A., Palanee, T., Sookrajh, Y., Lacey, C. J., Darbyshire, J., Grosskurth, H., Profy, A., Nunn, A., Hayes, R., & Weber, J.
Affiliations
  • MRC Clinical Trials Unit at UCL (GB)
  • MRC/UVRI & LSHTM Uganda Research Unit (UG)
  • University of the Witwatersrand (ZA)
  • Universitat de Barcelona (ES)
  • University Teaching Hospital (ZM)
  • Mwanza Intervention Trials Unit (TZ)
  • London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine (GB)
  • South African Medical Research Council (ZA)
  • University of York (GB)
  • Endo Pharmaceuticals (United States) (US)
  • Imperial College London (GB)
Corresponding author
McCormack, Sheena
Venue
The Lancet
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2010-10
Volume
376
Issue
9749
Pages
1329-1337
ISSN
  • 0099-5355 (ISSN-L)
  • 0140-6736
OpenAlex
W2169563864
Cited by
335
References
24
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 20 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 14 · 2018: 17 · 2017: 14 · 2016: 16 · 2015: 22 · 2014: 39 · 2013: 46 · 2012: 66
FWCI
31.20
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • The Lancet (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • LSHTM Research Online (London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine) (acceptedVersion)
  • UvA-DARE (University of Amsterdam) (submittedVersion)
  • UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institute for Health and Care Research (NF-SI-0507-10313)
  • Universiteit van Amsterdam
  • Department for International Development
  • Medical Research Council
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › HIV/AIDS Research and Interventions
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › HIV/AIDS drug development and treatment
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Microbiology › Reproductive tract infections research
Keywords
HIV-1 prevention, microbicides, women, HIV-1 incidence, vaginal candidiasis, vaginal candidiasis treatment, adverse events, sub-Saharan Africa, trial discontinuation, HIV prevention strategies, sexual transmission prevention, women's health
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Antiviral Agents, Double-Blind Method, Female, Humans, Middle Aged, Naphthalenesulfonates, Polymers, Sexual Behavior, Sexually Transmitted Diseases, Vaginal Creams, Foams, and Jellies, HIV-1, HIV Infections, Condoms, Africa South of the Sahara, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review