CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 31Meta-analysis and systematic reviewsStatistical Methods in Clinical TrialsClinical practice guidelines implementation

CONSORT 2010

Open access
Schulz, Kenneth F, Moher, David, Altman, Douglas G·2010·The Lancet
DOI 10.1016/s0140-6736(10)61879-x
Open this paper in CoChat — free accountOpen PDF

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0140-6736(10)61879-x

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

The text we found for this paper looks like another document, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The text we found for this paper looks like another document, so the self-check wasn’t run.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 7 · Cited by 31

Authors
Schulz, K. F., Moher, D., & Altman, D. G.
Affiliations
  • Family Health International 360 (US)
  • University of Ottawa (CA)
  • University of Oxford (GB)
Corresponding author
Schulz, Kenneth F
ORCID
Venue
The Lancet
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2010-10
Volume
376
Issue
9748
Pages
1222-1223
ISSN
  • 0099-5355 (ISSN-L)
  • 0140-6736
DOI
10.1016/s0140-6736(10)61879-x
OpenAlex
W2215051921
Cited by
31
References
7
Citations by year
2025: 3 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 3 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 3
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
Locations
  • The Lancet (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty › Meta-analysis and systematic reviews
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Statistical Methods in Clinical Trials
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Clinical practice guidelines implementation
Keywords
CONSORT 2010, reporting guidelines, trial design, blinding
MeSH terms
Child, Humans, Publishing, Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review