CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 356Global Maternal and Child HealthMaternal and Neonatal HealthcareMaternal and fetal healthcare

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 70 of the 70 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Stillbirths: why they matter

Frøen, J Frederik, Cacciatore, Joanne, McClure, Elizabeth M, Kuti, Oluwafemi, Jokhio, Abdul Hakeem, Islam, Monir, Shiffman, Jeremy·2011·The Lancet
DOI 10.1016/s0140-6736(10)62232-5
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

In this first paper of The Lancet's Stillbirths Series we explore the present status of stillbirths in the world-from global health policy to a survey of community perceptions in 135 countries. Our findings highlight the need for a strong call for action. In times of global focus on motherhood, the mother's own aspiration of a liveborn baby is not recognised on the world's health agenda. Millions of deaths are not counted; stillbirths are not in the Global Burden of Disease, nor in disability-adjusted life-years lost, and they are not part of the UN Millennium Development Goals. The grief of mothers might be aggravated by social stigma, blame, and marginalisation in regions where most deaths occur. Most stillborn babies are disposed of without any recognition or ritual, such as naming, funeral rites, or the mother holding or dressing the baby. Beliefs in the mother's sins and evil spirits as causes of stillbirth are rife, and stillbirth is widely believed to be a natural selection of babies never meant to live. Stillbirth prevention is closely linked with prevention of maternal and neonatal deaths. Knowledge of causes and feasible solutions for prevention is key to health professionals' priorities, to which this Stillbirths Series paper aims to contribute.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0140-6736(10)62232-5

Cites

70 of 70 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 68 references

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Middleton, 2010, Using Cochrane reviews to help reduce stillbirth in high income countries, J Paediatr Child Health, 46, 54 (A)
  2. Vanotoo, 2010, Community perceptions, beliefs and practices on stillbirth in Sekondi/Takoradi, J Peadiatr Child Health, 46, 21

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 201–300 of 354

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Frøen, J. F., Cacciatore, J., McClure, E. M., Kuti, O., Jokhio, A. H., Islam, M., & Shiffman, J.
Affiliations
  • Norwegian Institute of Public Health (NO)
  • Arizona State University (US)
  • University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (US)
  • Obafemi Awolowo University (NG)
  • Aga Khan University (PK)
  • World Health Organization Regional Office for South-East Asia (IN)
  • American University (US)
Corresponding author
Frøen, J Frederik
ORCID
Venue
The Lancet
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2011-04
Volume
377
Issue
9774
Pages
1353-1366
ISSN
  • 0099-5355 (ISSN-L)
  • 0140-6736
DOI
10.1016/s0140-6736(10)62232-5
OpenAlex
W2094312322
Cited by
356
References
68
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 20 · 2023: 17 · 2022: 20 · 2021: 31 · 2020: 22 · 2019: 28 · 2018: 23 · 2017: 19 · 2016: 31 · 2015: 30 · 2014: 36 · 2013: 29 · 2012: 21
FWCI
4.74
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/ (tdm)
Locations
  • The Lancet (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation
  • Norwegian Institute of Public Health
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Global Maternal and Child Health
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Maternal and Neonatal Healthcare
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Maternal and fetal healthcare
Keywords
stillbirth, stillbirth prevention, global health policy, maternal mortality, neonatal mortality, global burden of disease, Millennium Development Goals, maternal grief, social stigma, causes of stillbirth
MeSH terms
Adult, Attitude of Health Personnel, Culture, Female, Grief, Humans, Male, Pregnancy, Socioeconomic Factors, Global Health, Stillbirth

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review