The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Effect of consent rituals on mortality in emergency care research
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
This practice has already been adopted in several fields of research and may comprise patient-centric initiatives such as advocacy group support and involvement, patient advisory panels, and focus groups, interviews with trial participants and staff, questionnaires and Delphi surveys/consensus processes, and consensus meetings.
“Indeed, this practice has already been adopted in several fields of research and may comprise patient-centric initiatives such as advocacy group support and involvement, patient advisory panels, and focus groups, interviews with trial participants and staff, questionnaires and Delphi surveys/consensus processes, and consensus meetings. 336 344”
From European Resuscitation Council Guidelines 2021: Ethics of resuscitation and end of life decisions (2021) · cites this paper as [336]
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 5
- 1996, Protection of human subjects: informed consent and waiver of informed consent requirements in certain emergency research. Final rules 21CFR50.24, Fed Register, 61, 51498
- 2004, Effect of intravenous corticosteroids on death within 14 days in 10,008 adults with clinically significant head injury (MRC CRASH Trial): a randomised placebo-controlled trial, Lancet, 364, 1321, 10.1016/S0140-6736(04)17188-2 · DOI · Paper page
- 2004, Research in emergency situations: with or without relatives' consent, Emerg Med J, 21, 703, 10.1136/emj.2002.004788 · DOI
- 2010, Effects of tranexamic acid on death, vascular occlusive events, and blood transfusion in trauma patients with significant haemorrhage (CRASH-2): a randomised, placebo-controlled trial, Lancet, 376, 23, 10.1016/S0140-6736(10)60835-5 · DOI
- Chalmers, 2007, Regulation of therapeutic research is compromising the interests of patients, Int J Pharm Med, 21, 395, 10.2165/00124363-200721060-00004 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
European Resuscitation Council Guidelines 2021: Ethics of resuscitation and end of life decisions
Mentzelopoulos, S. D., Couper, K., Voorde, P. V. D., Druwé, P., Blom, M., Perkins, G. D., Lulic, I., Djakow, J., Raffay, V., Lilja, G., et al. (2021) · Resuscitation · doi:10.1016/j.resuscitation.2021.02.017 · Cited by 246
Metadata
- Authors
- Roberts, I., Prieto-Merino, D., Shakur, H., Chalmers, I., & Nicholl, J.
- Affiliations
- London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine (GB)
- University of Sheffield (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Roberts, Ian
- Venue
- The Lancet
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2011-03
- Volume
- 377
- Issue
- 9771
- Pages
- 1071-1072
- ISSN
- 0099-5355 (ISSN-L)
- 0140-6736
- OpenAlex
- W1983611842
- Cited by
- 213
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 20 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 13 · 2017: 22 · 2016: 26 · 2015: 18 · 2014: 25 · 2013: 26 · 2012: 14
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- The Lancet (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
- DigitalGeorgetown (Georgetown University Library) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Ethics in Clinical Research
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Ethics and bioethics in healthcare
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues
- Keywords
- informed consent, emergency care research, clinical trials, mortality, traumatic brain injury, respiratory distress, research ethics, treatment delay
- MeSH terms
- Antifibrinolytic Agents, Emergency Treatment, Hemorrhage, Humans, Informed Consent, Time Factors, Tranexamic Acid, Wounds and Injuries, Logistic Models, Survival Analysis, Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
