Cited by 402Global Public Health Policies and EpidemiologyGlobal Health and EpidemiologyHealthcare Systems and Public Health

UN High-Level meeting on non-communicable diseases: addressing four questions

Beaglehole, Robert, Bonita, Ruth, Alleyne, George, Horton, Richard, Li, Liming, Lincoln, Paul, Mbanya, Jean Claude, McKee, Martin +5 more·2011·The Lancet

Abstract

Non-communicable diseases (NCDs), principally heart disease, stroke, cancer, diabetes, and chronic respiratory diseases, are a global crisis and require a global response. Despite the threat to human development, and the availability of affordable, cost-effective, and feasible interventions, most countries, development agencies, and foundations neglect the crisis. The UN High-Level Meeting (UN HLM) on NCDs in September, 2011, is an opportunity to stimulate a coordinated global response to NCDs that is commensurate with their health and economic burdens. To achieve the promise of the UN HLM, several questions must be addressed. In this report, we present the realities of the situation by answering four questions: is there really a global crisis of NCDs; how is NCD a development issue; are affordable and cost-effective interventions available; and do we really need high-level leadership and accountability? Action against NCDs will support other global health and development priorities. A successful outcome of the UN HLM depends on the heads of states and governments attending the meeting, and endorsing and implementing the commitments to action. Long-term success requires inspired and committed national and international leadership.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0140-6736(11)60879-9

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Beaglehole, R., Bonita, R., Alleyne, G., Horton, R., Li, L., Lincoln, P., Mbanya, J. C., McKee, M., Moodie, R., Nishtar, S., Piot, P., Reddy, K. S., & Stuckler, D.
Affiliations
  • University of Auckland (NZ)
  • World Health Organization Regional Office for the Americas (US)
  • Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College (CN)
  • UK Health Forum (GB)
  • Université de Yaoundé I (CM)
  • London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine (GB)
  • The University of Melbourne (AU)
  • Heartfile (PK)
  • Public Health Foundation of India (IN)
Corresponding author
Beaglehole, Robert
Venue
The Lancet
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2011-07
Volume
378
Issue
9789
Pages
449-455
ISSN
  • 0099-5355 (ISSN-L)
  • 0140-6736
OpenAlex
W2098774775
Cited by
402
References
4
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 25 · 2020: 22 · 2019: 28 · 2018: 40 · 2017: 29 · 2016: 44 · 2015: 33 · 2014: 34 · 2013: 37 · 2012: 41
FWCI
77.28
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The Lancet (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Global Public Health Policies and Epidemiology
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Global Health and Epidemiology
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Healthcare Systems and Public Health
Keywords
non-communicable diseases, global health governance, cost-effective interventions, economic burden of disease
MeSH terms
Congresses as Topic, Diabetes Mellitus, Heart Diseases, Humans, Neoplasms, Respiratory Tract Diseases, United Nations, Global Health, Stroke

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review