Self-collection of vaginal specimens for human papillomavirus testing in cervical cancer prevention (MARCH): a community-based randomised controlled trial
Abstract
Background Vaginal self-sampling for human papillomavirus (HPV) DNA testing could increase rates of screening participation. In clinic-based settings, vaginal HPV testing is at least as sensitive as cytology for detecting cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) grade 2 or worse; however, effectiveness in home settings is unknown. We aimed to establish the relative sensitivity and positive predictive value for HPV screening of vaginal samples self-collected at home as compared with clinic-based cervical cytology. Methods We did a community-based, randomised equivalence trial in Mexican women of low socioeconomic status aged 25-65 years. Participants came from 540 medically underserved, predominantly rural communities in Morelos, Guerrero, and the state of Mexico. Our primary endpoint was CIN 2 or worse, detected by colposcopy. We used a computer-generated randomisation sequence to randomly allocate patients to HPV screening or cervical cytology. Eight community nurses who were masked to patient allocation received daily lists of the women's names and addresses, and did the assigned home visits. We referred women with positive results in either test to colposcopy. We did per-protocol and intention-to-screen analyses. This trial was registered with the Instituto Nacional de Salud Pública, Mexico, INSP number 590. Findings 12,330 women were randomly allocated to HPV screening and 12,731 to cervical cytology; 9202 women in the HPV screening group adhered to the protocol, as did 1…
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
There is limited data on the use of self-sampling in India.
“While there have been reports of their successful use in Africa, Latin America and in developed countries, there is limited data of their use in India (Lazcano-Ponce et al., 2011; Rees et al., 2018).”
From Acceptability and Concordance of Self- Versus Clinician- Sampling for HPV Testing among Rural South Indian Women (2021) · cites this paper as Lazcano-Ponce et al., 2011
The option of self-sampling may be essential to improving the effectiveness of the program in hard-to-reach populations.
“The option of self-sampling may be essential to improving the effectiveness of the program in hard-to-reach populations [25].”
From A community‐based, cross‐sectional study of hr<scp>HPV DNA</scp> self‐sampling‐based cervical cancer screening in rural Karnataka, India (2019) · cites this paper as [25]
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Global cancer in women: burden and trends.
Torre, L. A., Islami, F., Siegel, R. L., Ward, E. M., & Jemal, A. (2017) · Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention · doi:10.1158/1055-9965.epi-16-0858 · Cited by 1,245 · see citing works
Arbyn, M., Smith, S. B., Temin, S., Sultana, F., & Castle, P. (2018) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.k4823 · Cited by 851 · see citing works
Arrossi, S., Thouyaret, L., Herrero, R., Campanera, A., Magdaleno, A., Cuberli, M., Barletta, P., Laudi, R., & Orellana, L. (2015) · The Lancet Global Health · doi:10.1016/s2214-109x(14)70354-7 · Cited by 217 · see citing works
Costa, S., Verberckmoes, B., Castle, P. E., & Arbyn, M. (2023) · British Journal of Cancer · doi:10.1038/s41416-022-02094-w · Cited by 139 · see citing works
Rees, I., Jones, D., Chen, H., & Macleod, U. (2018) · Preventive Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.ypmed.2017.11.019 · Cited by 92 · see citing works
Madhivanan, P., Nishimura, H., Ravi, K., Pope, B., Coudray, M., Arun, A., Krupp, K., Jayakrishna, P., & Srinivas, V. (2021) · Asian Pacific Journal of Cancer Prevention · doi:10.31557/apjcp.2021.22.3.971 · Cited by 31 · see citing works
“While there have been reports of their successful use in Africa, Latin America and in developed countries, there is limited data of their use in India (Lazcano-Ponce et al., 2011; Rees et al., 2018).”
BackgroundAdsul, P., Srinivas, V., Gowda, S., Nayaka, S., Pramathesh, R., Chandrappa, K., Khan, A., Jayakrishna, P., & Madhivanan, P. (2019) · International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics · doi:10.1002/ijgo.12859 · Cited by 23 · see citing works
HPV self-testing and cervical cancer screening coverage
Gravitt, P. E., & Rositch, A. F. (2014) · The Lancet Oncology · doi:10.1016/s1470-2045(13)70605-3 · Cited by 19 · see citing works
- Authors
- Lazcano-Ponce, E., Lorincz, A. T., Cruz-Valdez, A., Salmerón, J., Uribe, P., Velasco-Mondragón, E., Nevarez, P. H., Acosta, R. D., & Hernández-Avila, M.
- Affiliations
- Instituto Nacional de Salud Pública (MX)
- Queen Mary University of London (GB)
- Mexican Social Security Institute (MX)
- Secretaria de Salud (MX)
- Morgan State University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Lorincz, Attila Tibor
- Venue
- The Lancet
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2011-11
- Volume
- 378
- Issue
- 9806
- Pages
- 1868-1873
- ISSN
- 0099-5355 (ISSN-L)
- 0140-6736
- OpenAlex
- W2163852430
- Cited by
- 230
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 7 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 18 · 2019: 16 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 16 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 18 · 2014: 25 · 2013: 26 · 2012: 26
- FWCI
- 19.04
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- Locations
- The Lancet (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Cervical Cancer and HPV Research
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Women's cancer prevention and management
- Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Microbiology › Reproductive tract infections research
- Keywords
- HPV testing, vaginal self-sampling, cervical cancer screening, cervical cytology, cervical intraepithelial neoplasia, HPV prevalence, screening sensitivity, positive predictive value, home-based screening, rural communities, Mexican women, cervical cancer prevention, community health workers, colposcopy, cervical cancer awareness
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Age Factors, Aged, Uterine Cervical Neoplasms, Community Health Services, Cytodiagnosis, Female, Humans, Mass Screening, Mexico, Middle Aged, Patient Participation, Sensitivity and Specificity, Vaginal Smears, Risk Assessment, Papillomaviridae, Papillomavirus Infections, Diagnostic Self Evaluation
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review