Cited by 230Cervical Cancer and HPV ResearchWomen's cancer prevention and managementReproductive tract infections research

Self-collection of vaginal specimens for human papillomavirus testing in cervical cancer prevention (MARCH): a community-based randomised controlled trial

Lazcano-Ponce, Eduardo, Lorincz, Attila Tibor, Cruz-Valdez, Aurelio, Salmerón, Jorge, Uribe, Patricia, Velasco-Mondragón, Eduardo, Nevarez, Pilar Hernandez, Acosta, Rodrigo Diaz +1 more·2011·The Lancet

Abstract

Background Vaginal self-sampling for human papillomavirus (HPV) DNA testing could increase rates of screening participation. In clinic-based settings, vaginal HPV testing is at least as sensitive as cytology for detecting cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) grade 2 or worse; however, effectiveness in home settings is unknown. We aimed to establish the relative sensitivity and positive predictive value for HPV screening of vaginal samples self-collected at home as compared with clinic-based cervical cytology. Methods We did a community-based, randomised equivalence trial in Mexican women of low socioeconomic status aged 25-65 years. Participants came from 540 medically underserved, predominantly rural communities in Morelos, Guerrero, and the state of Mexico. Our primary endpoint was CIN 2 or worse, detected by colposcopy. We used a computer-generated randomisation sequence to randomly allocate patients to HPV screening or cervical cytology. Eight community nurses who were masked to patient allocation received daily lists of the women's names and addresses, and did the assigned home visits. We referred women with positive results in either test to colposcopy. We did per-protocol and intention-to-screen analyses. This trial was registered with the Instituto Nacional de Salud Pública, Mexico, INSP number 590. Findings 12,330 women were randomly allocated to HPV screening and 12,731 to cervical cytology; 9202 women in the HPV screening group adhered to the protocol, as did 1…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0140-6736(11)61522-5

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Lazcano-Ponce, E., Lorincz, A. T., Cruz-Valdez, A., Salmerón, J., Uribe, P., Velasco-Mondragón, E., Nevarez, P. H., Acosta, R. D., & Hernández-Avila, M.
Affiliations
  • Instituto Nacional de Salud Pública (MX)
  • Queen Mary University of London (GB)
  • Mexican Social Security Institute (MX)
  • Secretaria de Salud (MX)
  • Morgan State University (US)
Corresponding author
Lorincz, Attila Tibor
Venue
The Lancet
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2011-11
Volume
378
Issue
9806
Pages
1868-1873
ISSN
  • 0099-5355 (ISSN-L)
  • 0140-6736
OpenAlex
W2163852430
Cited by
230
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 18 · 2019: 16 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 16 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 18 · 2014: 25 · 2013: 26 · 2012: 26
FWCI
19.04
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The Lancet (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Cervical Cancer and HPV Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Women's cancer prevention and management
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Microbiology › Reproductive tract infections research
Keywords
HPV testing, vaginal self-sampling, cervical cancer screening, cervical cytology, cervical intraepithelial neoplasia, HPV prevalence, screening sensitivity, positive predictive value, home-based screening, rural communities, Mexican women, cervical cancer prevention, community health workers, colposcopy, cervical cancer awareness
MeSH terms
Adult, Age Factors, Aged, Uterine Cervical Neoplasms, Community Health Services, Cytodiagnosis, Female, Humans, Mass Screening, Mexico, Middle Aged, Patient Participation, Sensitivity and Specificity, Vaginal Smears, Risk Assessment, Papillomaviridae, Papillomavirus Infections, Diagnostic Self Evaluation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review