Cited by 252Physical Activity and HealthUrban Transport and AccessibilityObesity, Physical Activity, Diet

Rethinking our approach to physical activity

Das, Pamela, Horton, Richard·2012·The Lancet

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0140-6736(12)61024-1

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 4 · Cited by 252

Authors
Das, P., & Horton, R.
Venue
The Lancet
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2012-07
Volume
380
Issue
9838
Pages
189-190
ISSN
  • 0099-5355 (ISSN-L)
  • 0140-6736
OpenAlex
W2120876750
Cited by
252
References
4
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 20 · 2023: 19 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 25 · 2020: 20 · 2019: 19 · 2018: 13 · 2017: 22 · 2016: 22 · 2015: 24 · 2014: 18 · 2013: 15 · 2012: 4
FWCI
13.02
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The Lancet (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Physical Activity and Health
  • Social Sciences › Transportation › Urban Transport and Accessibility
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet
Keywords
physical inactivity, physical activity, non-communicable diseases, human-environment relationship, physical activity level, correlates of physical activity, determinants of physical activity, physical activity surveillance, junk food advertising, public health interventions, sedentary behavior, life expectancy, adolescents, adults, low- and middle-income countries, high-income countries
MeSH terms
Breast Neoplasms, Colonic Neoplasms, Coronary Disease, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2, Female, Humans, Exercise, Cost of Illness

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review