Cited by 151Cardiac Arrhythmias and TreatmentsAtrial Fibrillation Management and OutcomesCardiac electrophysiology and arrhythmias

Catheter ablation of atrial arrhythmias: state of the art

Lee, Geoffrey, Sanders, Prashanthan, Kalman, Jonathan M·2012·The Lancet

Abstract

Catheter ablation is at the forefront of the management of a range of atrial arrhythmias. In this Series paper, we discuss the underlying mechanisms and the current role of catheter ablation for the three most common atrial arrhythmias encountered in clinical practice: focal atrial tachycardia, atrial flutter, and atrial fibrillation. The mechanisms of focal atrial tachycardia and atrial flutter are well understood, and these arrhythmias are amenable to curative catheter ablation with high success rates. In most cases, paroxysmal atrial fibrillation is initiated by triggers located within pulmonary vein musculature. Circumferential ablation to isolate this musculature is associated with high success rates for elimination of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation in selected populations. Because of the problem of recurrent pulmonary vein connection, more than one procedure will be needed in about 30% of patients, and new technologies are being developed to reduce this occurrence. The mechanisms that sustain persistent atrial fibrillation are not well understood and are the subject of continuing investigation. As such, ablation approaches and technologies for this arrhythmia are still evolving.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0140-6736(12)61463-9

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 81 · Cited by 151

Authors
Lee, G., Sanders, P., & Kalman, J. M.
Affiliations
  • The Royal Melbourne Hospital (AU)
  • Royal Adelaide Hospital (AU)
Corresponding author
Kalman, Jonathan M
Venue
The Lancet
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2012-10
Volume
380
Issue
9852
Pages
1509-1519
ISSN
  • 0099-5355 (ISSN-L)
  • 0140-6736
OpenAlex
W2081635043
Cited by
151
References
81
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 14 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 16 · 2015: 18 · 2014: 15 · 2013: 13 · 2012: 2
FWCI
2.53
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The Lancet (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Adelaide Research & Scholarship (AR&S) (University of Adelaide) (submittedVersion)
Funders
National Health and Medical Research Council (604908)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiac Arrhythmias and Treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Atrial Fibrillation Management and Outcomes
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiac electrophysiology and arrhythmias
Keywords
catheter ablation, atrial arrhythmias, focal atrial tachycardia, atrial flutter, paroxysmal atrial fibrillation, persistent atrial fibrillation, pulmonary vein isolation, pulmonary vein triggers, atrial fibrillation recurrence, arrhythmia mechanisms
MeSH terms
Atrial Fibrillation, Atrial Flutter, Electrocardiography, Heart Conduction System, Humans, Tachycardia, Supraventricular, Catheter Ablation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review