Catheter ablation of atrial arrhythmias: state of the art
Abstract
Catheter ablation is at the forefront of the management of a range of atrial arrhythmias. In this Series paper, we discuss the underlying mechanisms and the current role of catheter ablation for the three most common atrial arrhythmias encountered in clinical practice: focal atrial tachycardia, atrial flutter, and atrial fibrillation. The mechanisms of focal atrial tachycardia and atrial flutter are well understood, and these arrhythmias are amenable to curative catheter ablation with high success rates. In most cases, paroxysmal atrial fibrillation is initiated by triggers located within pulmonary vein musculature. Circumferential ablation to isolate this musculature is associated with high success rates for elimination of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation in selected populations. Because of the problem of recurrent pulmonary vein connection, more than one procedure will be needed in about 30% of patients, and new technologies are being developed to reduce this occurrence. The mechanisms that sustain persistent atrial fibrillation are not well understood and are the subject of continuing investigation. As such, ablation approaches and technologies for this arrhythmia are still evolving.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
AF burden could modify the response to rhythm control therapy.
“There is some evidence suggesting that AF burden may influence stroke risk 44,124,164 and could modify the response to rhythm control therapy.76,165”
From 2016 ESC Guidelines for the management of atrial fibrillation developed in collaboration with EACTS (2016) · cites this paper as [165]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 81 · Cited by 151
- Authors
- Lee, G., Sanders, P., & Kalman, J. M.
- Affiliations
- The Royal Melbourne Hospital (AU)
- Royal Adelaide Hospital (AU)
- Corresponding author
- Kalman, Jonathan M
- Venue
- The Lancet
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2012-10
- Volume
- 380
- Issue
- 9852
- Pages
- 1509-1519
- ISSN
- 0099-5355 (ISSN-L)
- 0140-6736
- OpenAlex
- W2081635043
- Cited by
- 151
- References
- 81
- Citations by year
- 2026: 4 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 14 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 16 · 2015: 18 · 2014: 15 · 2013: 13 · 2012: 2
- FWCI
- 2.53
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- The Lancet (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Adelaide Research & Scholarship (AR&S) (University of Adelaide) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- National Health and Medical Research Council (604908)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiac Arrhythmias and Treatments
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Atrial Fibrillation Management and Outcomes
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiac electrophysiology and arrhythmias
- Keywords
- catheter ablation, atrial arrhythmias, focal atrial tachycardia, atrial flutter, paroxysmal atrial fibrillation, persistent atrial fibrillation, pulmonary vein isolation, pulmonary vein triggers, atrial fibrillation recurrence, arrhythmia mechanisms
- MeSH terms
- Atrial Fibrillation, Atrial Flutter, Electrocardiography, Heart Conduction System, Humans, Tachycardia, Supraventricular, Catheter Ablation
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review