The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Efficacy and safety of regorafenib for advanced gastrointestinal stromal tumours after failure of imatinib and sunitinib (GRID): an international, multicentre, randomised, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial
Open accessAbstract
Summary Background To date, only two agents, imatinib and sunitinib, have shown clinical benefit in patients with gastrointestinal stromal tumours (GISTs), but almost all metastatic GISTs eventually develop resistance to these agents, resulting in fatal disease progression. This phase 3 trial assessed efficacy and safety of regorafenib in patients with metastatic and/or unresectable GIST progressing after failure of at least imatinib and sunitinib. Methods Patients were randomised 2:1 to receive either regorafenib 160 mg orally daily or placebo, plus best supportive care in both arms, for the first 3 weeks of each 4-week cycle. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS). Upon disease progression, patients on placebo could cross over to regorafenib. Secondary endpoints included overall survival (OS), objective response rate, disease control rate (DCR: rate of durable stable disease lasting for ≥12 weeks plus complete or partial responses), and safety. This trial is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT01271712). Results From January to August 2011, 240 patients were screened at 57 centres in 17 countries, and 199 patients were randomised to receive regorafenib (n=133) or matching placebo (n=66). Median PFS per independent blinded central review was 4·8 months and 0·9 months, respectively (hazard ratio [HR] 0·27, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0·19–0·39; p<0·0001). Following progression, 56/66 patients (84·8%) on placebo crossed over to regorafenib, resulting in no significant difference in OS between study arms (HR 0·77, 95% CI 0·42–1·41; p=0·199). A best response of partial response or stable disease was observed in 101/133 patients (75·9%) on regorafenib and 23/66 patients (34·8%) on placebo. DCR was 52·6% (70/133 patients) and 9·1% (6/66 patients), respectively. Drug-related adverse events were reported in 130 (98·5%) of 132 regorafenib patients and 45 (68·2%) of 66 placebo patients. The most common grade ≥3 regorafenib-related adverse events were hypertension (31/132, 23·5%), hand–foot skin reaction (26/132, 19·7%), and diarrhoea (7/132, 5·3%). Interpretation Regorafenib significantly improved PFS and DCR, compared with placebo, in patients with advanced GIST progressing after failure of at least imatinib and sunitinib.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Efficacy and safety of imatinib mesylate in advanced gastrointestinal stromal tumors
Demetri, G. D., von Mehren, M., Blanke, C. D., Van den Abbeele, A. D., Eisenberg, B., Roberts, P. J., Heinrich, M. C., Tuveson, D. A., Singer, S., Janicek, M., et al. (2002) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa020461 · Cited by 4,389
Self-citation
Cited by
Cherny, N. I., Sullivan, R., Dafni, U., Kerst, J. M., Sobrero, A., Zielinski, C., de Vries, E. G. E., & Piccart, M. J. (2015) · Annals of Oncology · doi:10.1093/annonc/mdv249 · Cited by 818
Li, J., Qin, S., Xu, R., Yau, T. C. C., Ma, B., Pan, H., Xu, J., Bai, Y., Chi, Y., Wang, L., et al. (2015) · The Lancet Oncology · doi:10.1016/s1470-2045(15)70156-7 · Cited by 813
Self-citationTherapeutic targeting of the angiopoietin–TIE pathway
Saharinen, P., Eklund, L., & Alitalo, K. (2017) · Nature Reviews Drug Discovery · doi:10.1038/nrd.2016.278 · Cited by 620
Targeting Angiogenesis in Cancer Therapy: Moving Beyond Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor
Zhao, Y., & Adjei, A. A. (2015) · The Oncologist · doi:10.1634/theoncologist.2014-0465 · Cited by 558
Yamamoto, Y., Matsui, J., Matsushima, T., Obaishi, H., Miyazaki, K., Nakamura, K., Tohyama, O., Semba, T., Yamaguchi, A., Hoshi, S., et al. (2014) · Vascular Cell · doi:10.1186/2045-824x-6-18 · Cited by 507
Metadata
- Authors
- Demetri, G. D., Reichardt, P., Kang, Y.-K., Blay, J.-Y., Rutkowski, P., Gelderblom, H., Hohenberger, P., Leahy, M., von Mehren, M., Joensuu, H., Badalamenti, G., Blackstein, M., Le Cesne, A., Schöffski, P., Maki, R. G., Bauer, S., Nguyen, B. B., Xu, J., Nishida, T., Chung, J., Kappeler, C., Kuss, I., Laurent, D., & Casali, P. G.
- Venue
- The Lancet
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2013-01
- Volume
- 381
- Issue
- 9863
- Pages
- 295-302
- ISSN
- 0099-5355 (ISSN-L)
- 0140-6736
- OpenAlex
- W2116922255
- Cited by
- 1,406
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 76.29
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Efficacy and safety of regorafenib for advanced gastrointestinal stromal tumours after failure of imatinib and sunitinib (GRID): an international, multicentre, randomised, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/s0140-6736(12)61857-1
- The paper
- Demetri, G. D., Reichardt, P., Kang, Y.-K., Blay, J.-Y., Rutkowski, P., Gelderblom, H., Hohenberger, P., Leahy, M., von Mehren, M., Joensuu, H., Badalamenti, G., Blackstein, M., Le Cesne, A., Schöffski, P., Maki, R. G., Bauer, S., Nguyen, B. B., Xu, J., Nishida, T., . . . Casali, P. G. (2013). Efficacy and safety of regorafenib for advanced gastrointestinal stromal tumours after failure of imatinib and sunitinib (GRID): an international, multicentre, randomised, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial. The Lancet. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0140-6736(12)61857-1
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.