Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 743

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 8 of the 8 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Genetic diagnosis of developmental disorders in the DDD study: a scalable analysis of genome-wide research data

Open access
Wright, Caroline F, Fitzgerald, Tomas W, Jones, Wendy D, Clayton, Stephen, McRae, Jeremy F, van Kogelenberg, Margriet, King, Daniel A, Ambridge, Kirsty, Barrett, Daniel M, Bayzetinova, Tanya, Bevan, A Paul, Bragin, Eugene, Chatzimichali, Eleni A, Gribble, Susan, Jones, Philip, Krishnappa, Netravathi, Mason, Laura E, Miller, Ray, Morley, Katherine I, Parthiban, Vijaya, Prigmore, Elena, Rajan, Diana, Sifrim, Alejandro, Swaminathan, G Jawahar, Tivey, Adrian R, Middleton, Anna, Parker, Michael, Carter, Nigel P, Barrett, Jeffrey C, Hurles, Matthew E, FitzPatrick, David R, Firth, Helen V·2015·The Lancet

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Human genome sequencing has transformed our understanding of genomic variation and its relevance to health and disease, and is now starting to enter clinical practice for the diagnosis of rare diseases. The question of whether and how some categories of genomic findings should be shared with individual research participants is currently a topic of international debate, and development of robust analytical workflows to identify and communicate clinically relevant variants is paramount. METHODS: The Deciphering Developmental Disorders (DDD) study has developed a UK-wide patient recruitment network involving over 180 clinicians across all 24 regional genetics services, and has performed genome-wide microarray and whole exome sequencing on children with undiagnosed developmental disorders and their parents. After data analysis, pertinent genomic variants were returned to individual research participants via their local clinical genetics team. FINDINGS: Around 80,000 genomic variants were identified from exome sequencing and microarray analysis in each individual, of which on average 400 were rare and predicted to be protein altering. By focusing only on de novo and segregating variants in known developmental disorder genes, we achieved a diagnostic yield of 27% among 1133 previously investigated yet undiagnosed children with developmental disorders, whilst minimising incidental findings. In families with developmentally normal parents, whole exome sequencing of the child and both parents resulted in a 10-fold reduction in the number of potential causal variants that needed clinical evaluation compared to sequencing only the child. Most diagnostic variants identified in known genes were novel and not present in current databases of known disease variation. INTERPRETATION: Implementation of a robust translational genomics workflow is achievable within a large-scale rare disease research study to allow feedback of potentially diagnostic findings to clinicians and research participants. Systematic recording of relevant clinical data, curation of a gene-phenotype knowledge base, and development of clinical decision support software are needed in addition to automated exclusion of almost all variants, which is crucial for scalable prioritisation and review of possible diagnostic variants. However, the resource requirements of development and maintenance of a clinical reporting system within a research setting are substantial. FUNDING: Health Innovation Challenge Fund, a parallel funding partnership between the Wellcome Trust and the UK Department of Health.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0140-6736(14)61705-0

Cites

8 of 8 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 8 references

Research works printed but not linked: 30

  1. Bamshad, 2011, Exome sequencing as a tool for mendelian disease gene discovery, Nat Rev Genet, 12, 745, 10.1038/nrg3031 · DOI · Paper page
  2. Yang, 2013, Clinical whole-exome sequencing for the diagnosis of mendelian disorders, N Engl J Med, 369, 1502, 10.1056/NEJMoa1306555 · DOI · Paper page
  3. Worthey, 2011, Making a definitive diagnosis: successful clinical application of whole exome sequencing in a child with intractable inflammatory bowel disease, Genet Med, 13, 255, 10.1097/GIM.0b013e3182088158 · DOI · Paper page
  4. Wolf, 2012, Managing incidental findings and research results in genomic research involving biobanks and archived data sets, Genet Med, 14, 361, 10.1038/gim.2012.23 · DOI · Paper page
  5. Kohane, 2006, The incidentalome, JAMA, 296, 212, 10.1001/jama.296.2.212 · DOI · Paper page
  6. Wright, 2013, Policy challenges of clinical genome sequencing, BMJ, 347, f6845, 10.1136/bmj.f6845 · DOI
  7. Berg, 2011, Deploying whole genome sequencing in clinical practice and public health: meeting the challenge one bin at a time, Genet Med, 13, 499, 10.1097/GIM.0b013e318220aaba · DOI · Paper page
  8. Dorschner, 2013, Actionable, pathogenic incidental findings in 1000 participants' exomes, Am J Hum Genet, 93, 631, 10.1016/j.ajhg.2013.08.006 · DOI · Paper page
  9. Sagoo, 2009, Array CGH in patients with learning disability (mental retardation) and congenital anomalies: updated systematic review and meta-analysis of 19 studies and 13 926 subjects, Genet Med, 11, 139, 10.1097/GIM.0b013e318194ee8f · DOI · Paper page
  10. O'Roak, 2011, Exome sequencing in sporadic autism spectrum disorders identifies severe de novo mutations, Nat Genet, 43, 585, 10.1038/ng.835 · DOI · Paper page
  11. Vissers, 2010, A de novo paradigm for mental retardation, Nat Genet, 42, 1109, 10.1038/ng.712 · DOI · Paper page
  12. Topper, 2011, Exome sequencing and the genetics of intellectual disability, Clin Genet, 80, 117, 10.1111/j.1399-0004.2011.01720.x · DOI
  13. Middleton, 2013, Empirical research on the ethics of genomic research, Am J Med Genet A, 161, 2099, 10.1002/ajmg.a.36067 · DOI
  14. Middleton, 2014, No expectation to share incidental findings in genomic research, Lancet
  15. Robinson, 2000, Mechanisms leading to uniparental disomy and their clinical consequences, BioEssays, 22, 452, 10.1002/(SICI)1521-1878(200005)22:5<452::AID-BIES7>3.0.CO;2-K · doi:10.1002/(sici)1521-1878(200005)22:5<452::aid-bies7>3.0.co;2-k
  16. Robinson, 2010, The human phenotype ontology, Clin Genet, 77, 525, 10.1111/j.1399-0004.2010.01436.x · DOI · Paper page
  17. Bragin, 2014, DECIPHER: database for the interpretation of phenotype-linked plausibly pathogenic sequence and copy-number variation, Nucleic Acids Res, 42, D993, 10.1093/nar/gkt937 · DOI · Paper page
  18. Ramu, 2013, DeNovoGear: de novo indel and point mutation discovery and phasing, Nat Meth, 10, 985, 10.1038/nmeth.2611 · DOI · Paper page
  19. McLaren, 2010, Deriving the consequences of genomic variants with the Ensembl API and SNP effect predictor, Bioinformatics, 26, 2069, 10.1093/bioinformatics/btq330 · DOI · Paper page
  20. Piton, 2013, XLID-causing mutations and associated genes challenged in light of data from large-scale human exome sequencing, Am J Hum Genet, 93, 368, 10.1016/j.ajhg.2013.06.013 · DOI · Paper page
  21. King, 2014, A novel method for detecting uniparental disomy from trio genotypes identifies a significant excess in children with developmental disorders, Genome Res, 24, 673, 10.1101/gr.160465.113 · DOI
  22. Kircher, 2014, A general framework for estimating the relative pathogenicity of human genetic variants, Nat Genet, 46, 310, 10.1038/ng.2892 · DOI · Paper page
  23. Rauch, 2012, Range of genetic mutations associated with severe non-syndromic sporadic intellectual disability: an exome sequencing study, Lancet, 380, 1674, 10.1016/S0140-6736(12)61480-9 · DOI · Paper page
  24. Lee, 2014, Clinical exome sequencing for genetic identification of rare mendelian disorders, JAMA, 312, 1880, 10.1001/jama.2014.14604 · DOI · Paper page
  25. Yang, 2014, Molecular findings among patients referred for clinical whole-exome sequencing, JAMA, 312, 1870, 10.1001/jama.2014.14601 · DOI · Paper page
  26. Koboldt, 2014, Exome-based mapping and variant prioritization for inherited mendelian disorders, Am J Hum Genet, 94, 373, 10.1016/j.ajhg.2014.01.016 · DOI
  27. MacArthur, 2014, Guidelines for investigating causality of sequence variants in human disease, Nature, 508, 469, 10.1038/nature13127 · DOI · Paper page
  28. van Karnebeek, 2012, Treatable inborn errors of metabolism causing intellectual disability: a systematic literature review, Mol Genet Metab, 105, 368, 10.1016/j.ymgme.2011.11.191 · DOI · Paper page
  29. Gliwa, 2013, Do researchers have an obligation to actively look for genetic incidental findings?, Am J Bioeth, 13, 32, 10.1080/15265161.2012.754062 · DOI
  30. Green, 2013, ACMG recommendations for reporting of incidental findings in clinical exome and genome sequencing, Genet Med, 15, 565, 10.1038/gim.2013.73 · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

See all 743

Metadata

Authors
Wright, C. F., Fitzgerald, T. W., Jones, W. D., Clayton, S., McRae, J. F., van Kogelenberg, M., King, D. A., Ambridge, K., Barrett, D. M., Bayzetinova, T., Bevan, A. P., Bragin, E., Chatzimichali, E. A., Gribble, S., Jones, P., Krishnappa, N., Mason, L. E., Miller, R., Morley, K. I., Parthiban, V., Prigmore, E., Rajan, D., Sifrim, A., Swaminathan, G. J., Tivey, A. R., Middleton, A., Parker, M., Carter, N. P., Barrett, J. C., Hurles, M. E., FitzPatrick, D. R., & Firth, H. V.
Venue
The Lancet
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2015-04
Volume
385
Issue
9975
Pages
1305-1314
ISSN
  • 0099-5355 (ISSN-L)
  • 0140-6736
OpenAlex
W2100407705
Cited by
743
References
8
FWCI
34.87
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
hybrid
Licence

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Genetic diagnosis of developmental disorders in the DDD study: a scalable analysis of genome-wide research data. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/s0140-6736(14)61705-0
The paper
Wright, C. F., Fitzgerald, T. W., Jones, W. D., Clayton, S., McRae, J. F., van Kogelenberg, M., King, D. A., Ambridge, K., Barrett, D. M., Bayzetinova, T., Bevan, A. P., Bragin, E., Chatzimichali, E. A., Gribble, S., Jones, P., Krishnappa, N., Mason, L. E., Miller, R., Morley, K. I., . . . Firth, H. V. (2015). Genetic diagnosis of developmental disorders in the DDD study: a scalable analysis of genome-wide research data. The Lancet. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0140-6736(14)61705-0

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.