Cited by 241Global Maternal and Child HealthReproductive Health and ContraceptionMaternal and Neonatal Healthcare

Reproductive, maternal, newborn, and child health: key messages from Disease Control Priorities 3rd Edition

Black, Robert E, Levin, Carol, Walker, Neff, Chou, Doris, Liu, Li, Temmerman, Marleen·2016·The Lancet

Abstract

As part of Disease Control Priorities 3rd Edition, the World Bank will publish a volume on Reproductive, Maternal, Newborn, and Child Health that identifies essential cost-effective health interventions that can be scaled up to reduce maternal, newborn, and child deaths, and stillbirths. This Review summarises the volume's key findings and estimates the effect and cost of expanded implementation of these interventions. Recognising that a continuum of care from the adolescent girl, woman, or mother to child is needed, the volume includes details of preventive and therapeutic health interventions in integrated packages: Maternal and Newborn Health and Child Health (along with folic acid supplementation, a key reproductive health intervention). Scaling up all interventions in these packages from coverage in 2015 to hypothetically immediately achieve 90% coverage would avert 149 000 maternal deaths, 849 000 stillbirths, 1 498 000 neonatal deaths, and 1 515 000 additional child deaths. In alternative calculations that consider only the effects of reducing the number of pregnancies by provision of contraceptive services as part of a Reproductive Health package, meeting 90% of the unmet need for contraception would reduce global births by almost 28 million and consequently avert deaths that could have occurred at 2015 rates of fertility and mortality. Thus, 67 000 maternal deaths, 440 000 neonatal deaths, 473 000 child deaths, and 564 000 stillbirths could be averted from avoided pregnancies. Particularly effective interventions in the Maternal and Newborn Health and Child Health packages would be management of labour and delivery, care of preterm births, and treatment of serious infectious diseases and acute malnutrition. Nearly all of these essential interventions can be delivered by health workers in the community or in primary health centres, which can increase population access to needed services. The annual incremental cost of immediately scaling up these essential interventions would be US$6·2 billion in low-income countries, $12·4 billion in lower-middle-income countries, and $8·0 billion in upper-middle-income countries. With the additional funding, greater focus on high-effect integrated interventions and innovations in service delivery, such as task shifting to other groups of health workers and supply and demand incentives, can help rectify major gaps in accessibility and quality of care. In recent decades, reduction of avoidable maternal and child deaths has been a global priority. With continued priority and expansion of essential reproductive, maternal, newborn, and child health interventions to high coverage, equity, and quality, as well as interventions to address underlying problems such as women's low status in society and violence against women, these deaths and substantial morbidity can be largely eliminated in another generation.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0140-6736(16)00738-8

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 63 · Cited by 241

Authors
Black, R. E., Levin, C., Walker, N., Chou, D., Liu, L., & Temmerman, M.
Affiliations
  • Johns Hopkins University (US)
  • University of Washington (US)
  • World Health Organization (CH)
Corresponding author
Black, Robert E
Venue
The Lancet
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2016-12
Volume
388
Issue
10061
Pages
2811-2824
ISSN
  • 0099-5355 (ISSN-L)
  • 0140-6736
OpenAlex
W2330782740
Cited by
241
References
63
Citations by year
2026: 12 · 2025: 19 · 2024: 20 · 2023: 23 · 2022: 27 · 2021: 43 · 2020: 23 · 2019: 22 · 2018: 22 · 2017: 21 · 2016: 8 · 2014: 1
FWCI
3.75
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The Lancet (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • eCommons - AKU (Aga Khan University) (submittedVersion)
  • Ghent University Academic Bibliography (Ghent University) (submittedVersion)
Funders
World Health Organization
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Global Maternal and Child Health
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Reproductive Health and Contraception
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Maternal and Neonatal Healthcare
Keywords
reproductive, maternal, newborn and child health, maternal mortality, neonatal mortality, child mortality, stillbirth, scaling up health interventions, cost-effectiveness, contraceptive services, folic acid supplementation, acute malnutrition, task shifting, primary care, low-income countries, unmet need for contraception, mortality averted, service gaps
MeSH terms
Child Health, Child, Delivery of Health Care, Female, Humans, Infant, Infant Mortality, Infant, Newborn, Maternal Health Services, Morbidity, Pregnancy, Health Care Costs, Delivery, Obstetric, Reproductive Health

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review