The DOI matches its Crossref record; 129 of the 137 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Beyond too little, too late and too much, too soon: a pathway towards evidence-based, respectful maternity care worldwide
Open accessAbstract
On the continuum of maternal health care, two extreme situations exist: too little, too late (TLTL) and too much, too soon (TMTS). TLTL describes care with inadequate resources, below evidence-based standards, or care withheld or unavailable until too late to help. TLTL is an underlying problem associated with high maternal mortality and morbidity. TMTS describes the routine over-medicalisation of normal pregnancy and birth. TMTS includes unnecessary use of non-evidence-based interventions, as well as use of interventions that can be life saving when used appropriately, but harmful when applied routinely or overused. As facility births increase, so does the recognition that TMTS causes harm and increases health costs, and often concentrates disrespect and abuse. Although TMTS is typically ascribed to high-income countries and TLTL to low-income and middle-income ones, social and health inequities mean these extremes coexist in many countries. A global approach to quality and equitable maternal health, supporting the implementation of respectful, evidence-based care for all, is urgently needed. We present a systematic review of evidence-based clinical practice guidelines for routine antenatal, intrapartum, and postnatal care, categorising them as recommended, recommended only for clinical indications, and not recommended. We also present prevalence data from middle-income countries for specific clinical practices, which demonstrate TLTL and increasing TMTS. Health-care providers and health systems need to ensure that all women receive high-quality, evidence-based, equitable and respectful care. The right amount of care needs to be offered at the right time, and delivered in a manner that respects, protects, and promotes human rights.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The Millennium Development Goals Report
(2018) · Human Rights Documents online · doi:10.1163/2210-7975_hrd-9927-2015002 · Cited by 3,611
Too far to walk: Maternal mortality in context
Thaddeus, S., & Maine, D. (1994) · Social Science & Medicine · doi:10.1016/0277-9536(94)90226-7 · Cited by 3,240
Effectiveness and efficiency of guideline dissemination and implementation strategies
Grimshaw, J., Thomas, R., MacLennan, G., Fraser, C., Ramsay, C., Vale, L., Whitty, P., Eccles, M., Matowe, L., Shirran, L., et al. (2004) · Health Technology Assessment · doi:10.3310/hta8060 · Cited by 3,044
Alkema, L., Chou, D., Hogan, D., Zhang, S., Moller, A.-B., Gemmill, A., Fat, D. M., Boerma, T., Temmerman, M., Mathers, C., et al. (2016) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(15)00838-7 · Cited by 2,261
The Increasing Trend in Caesarean Section Rates: Global, Regional and National Estimates: 1990-2014
Betrán, A. P., Ye, J., Moller, A.-B., Zhang, J., Gülmezoglu, A. M., & Torloni, M. R. (2016) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0148343 · Cited by 2,250
Maternal mortality: who, when, where, and why
Ronsmans, C., & Graham, W. J. (2006) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(06)69380-x · Cited by 1,839
Strategies for reducing maternal mortality: getting on with what works
Campbell, O. M., & Graham, W. J. (2006) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(06)69381-1 · Cited by 1,785
Bohren, M. A., Vogel, J. P., Hunter, E. C., Lutsiv, O., Makh, S. K., Souza, J. P., Aguiar, C., Saraiva Coneglian, F., Diniz, A. L. A., Tunçalp, Ö., et al. (2015) · PLOS Medicine · doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.1001847 · Cited by 1,656
Self-citationSafe prevention of the primary cesarean delivery
Caughey, A. B., Cahill, A. G., Guise, J., & Rouse, D. J. (2014) · American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology · doi:10.1016/j.ajog.2014.01.026 · Cited by 1,406
What drives change? Barriers to and incentives for achieving evidence‐based practice
Grol, R., & Wensing, M. (2004) · Medical Journal of Australia · doi:10.5694/j.1326-5377.2004.tb05948.x · Cited by 1,378
Research works printed but not linked: 3
- Gibbons, 2010, The global numbers and costs of additionally needed and unnecessary caesarean sections performed per year: overuse as a barrier to universal coverage, World Heal Rep Backgr Pap, 30, 1
- Souza, 2014, On labor and childbirth: the importance of quaternary prevention, Cad Saude Publica, 30, S1
- 2014, Births: preliminary data for 2013, Evol Heal Dis, 63, 1
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Escuriet, R., García-Lausin, L., Poveda, I. S., Casañas, R., Robleda, G., Vélez, O. C., Pérez-Botella, M., Frith, L., Daly, D., & Pueyo, M. (2017) · European Journal of Midwifery · doi:10.18332/ejm/76820 · Cited by 2,251
Starrs, A. M., Ezeh, A. C., Barker, G., Basu, A., Bertrand, J. T., Blum, R., Coll-Seck, A. M., Grover, A., Laski, L., Roa, M., et al. (2018) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(18)30293-9 · Cited by 1,598
Short-term and long-term effects of caesarean section on the health of women and children
Sandall, J., Tribe, R. M., Avery, L., Mola, G., Visser, G. H., Homer, C. S., Gibbons, D., Kelly, N. M., Kennedy, H. P., Kidanto, H., et al. (2018) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(18)31930-5 · Cited by 1,394
Vedam, S., Stoll, K. H., Taiwo, T. K., Rubashkin, N. A., Cheyney, M. J., Strauss, N., McLemore, M. R., Cadena, M. L., Nethery, E., Rushton, E., et al. (2019) · Reproductive Health · doi:10.1186/s12978-019-0729-2 · Cited by 893
What matters to women during childbirth: A systematic qualitative review
Downe, S., Finlayson, K., Oladapo, O., Bonet, M., & Gülmezoglu, A. M. (2018) · PLOS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0194906 · Cited by 550
Metadata
- Authors
- Miller, S., Abalos, E., Chamillard, M., Ciapponi, A., Colaci, D., Comandé, D., Diaz, V., Geller, S., Hanson, C., Langer, A., Manuelli, V., Millar, K., Morhason-Bello, I., Castro, C. P., Pileggi, V. N., Robinson, N., Skaer, M., Souza, J. P., Vogel, J. P., & Althabe, F.
- Affiliations
- University of California, San Francisco (US)
- Centro Rosarino de Estudios Perinatales (AR)
- Instituto de Efectividad Clínica y Sanitaria (AR)
- University of Illinois Chicago (US)
- Karolinska Institutet (SE)
- Harvard University (US)
- University of Ibadan (NG)
- Universidade de São Paulo (BR)
- Harbor–UCLA Medical Center (US)
- World Health Organization (CH)
- Corresponding author
- Miller, Suellen
- ORCID
- Venue
- The Lancet
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2016-10
- Volume
- 388
- Issue
- 10056
- Pages
- 2176-2192
- ISSN
- 0099-5355 (ISSN-L)
- 0140-6736
- OpenAlex
- W2519393586
- Cited by
- 1,181
- References
- 137
- Citations by year
- 2026: 95 · 2025: 112 · 2024: 128 · 2023: 116 · 2022: 146 · 2021: 168 · 2020: 161 · 2019: 114 · 2018: 81 · 2017: 47 · 2016: 11
- FWCI
- 14.90
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- The Lancet (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- LSHTM Research Online (London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine) (acceptedVersion)
- eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion)
- CONICET Digital (CONICET) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
- Funders
- Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation
- John D. and Catherine T. MacArthur Foundation
- World Health Organization
- Karolinska Institutet
- Medical Research Council (MR/K012126/1)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Obstetrics and Gynecology › Maternal and Perinatal Health Interventions
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Global Maternal and Child Health
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Maternal and fetal healthcare
- Keywords
- respectful maternity care, evidence-based clinical guidelines, prenatal care, intrapartum care, postpartum care, maternal health equity, maternal mortality, disrespect and abuse in childbirth, middle-income countries, facility births, maternity care quality
- MeSH terms
- Female, Humans, Maternal Health Services, Maternal Mortality, Pregnancy, Global Health, Practice Guidelines as Topic, Evidence-Based Medicine, Health Status Disparities
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review