The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Rucaparib maintenance treatment for recurrent ovarian carcinoma after response to platinum therapy (ARIEL3): a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial
Open accessAbstract
Summary Background Rucaparib, a poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitor, has anticancer activity in recurrent ovarian carcinoma harbouring a BRCA mutation or high percentage of genome-wide loss of heterozygosity. In this trial we assessed rucaparib versus placebo after response to second-line or later platinum-based chemotherapy in patients with high-grade, recurrent, platinum-sensitive ovarian carcinoma. Methods In this randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial, we recruited patients from 87 hospitals and cancer centres across 11 countries. Eligible patients were aged 18 years or older, had a platinum-sensitive, high-grade serous or endometrioid ovarian, primary peritoneal, or fallopian tube carcinoma, had received at least two previous platinum-based chemotherapy regimens, had achieved complete or partial response to their last platinum-based regimen, had a cancer antigen 125 concentration of less than the upper limit of normal, had a performance status of 0–1, and had adequate organ function. Patients were ineligible if they had symptomatic or untreated central nervous system metastases, had received anticancer therapy 14 days or fewer before starting the study, or had received previous treatment with a poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitor. We randomly allocated patients 2:1 to receive oral rucaparib 600 mg twice daily or placebo in 28 day cycles using a computer-generated sequence (block size of six, stratified by homologous recombination repair gene mutation status, progression-free interval after the penultimate platinum-based regimen, and best response to the most recent platinum-based regimen). Patients, investigators, site staff, assessors, and the funder were masked to assignments. The primary outcome was investigator-assessed progression-free survival evaluated with use of an ordered step-down procedure for three nested cohorts: patients with BRCA mutations (carcinoma associated with deleterious germline or somatic BRCA mutations), patients with homologous recombination deficiencies (BRCA mutant or BRCA wild-type and high loss of heterozygosity), and the intention-to-treat population, assessed at screening and every 12 weeks thereafter. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT01968213; enrolment is complete. Findings Between April 7, 2014, and July 19, 2016, we randomly allocated 564 patients: 375 (66%) to rucaparib and 189 (34%) to placebo. Median progression-free survival in patients with a BRCA-mutant carcinoma was 16·6 months (95% CI 13·4–22·9; 130 [35%] patients) in the rucaparib group versus 5·4 months (3·4–6·7; 66 [35%] patients) in the placebo group (hazard ratio 0·23 [95% CI 0·16–0·34]; p<0·0001). In patients with a homologous recombination deficient carcinoma (236 [63%] vs 118 [62%]), it was 13·6 months (10·9–16·2) versus 5·4 months (5·1–5·6; 0·32 [0·24–0·42]; p<0·0001). In the intention-to-treat population, it was 10·8 months (8·3–11·4) versus 5·4 months (5·3–5·5; 0·36 [0·30–0·45]; p<0·0001). Treatment-emergent adverse events of grade 3 or higher in the safety population (372 [99%] patients in the rucaparib group vs 189 [100%] in the placebo group) were reported in 209 (56%) patients in the rucaparib group versus 28 (15%) in the placebo group, the most common of which were anaemia or decreased haemoglobin concentration (70 [19%] vs one [1%]) and increased alanine or aspartate aminotransferase concentration (39 [10%] vs none). Interpretation Across all primary analysis groups, rucaparib significantly improved progression-free survival in patients with platinum-sensitive ovarian cancer who had achieved a response to platinum-based chemotherapy. ARIEL3 provides further evidence that use of a poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitor in the maintenance treatment setting versus placebo could be considered a new standard of care for women with platinum-sensitive ovarian cancer following a complete or partial response to second-line or later platinum-based chemotherapy. Funding Clovis Oncology, Inc.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
New response evaluation criteria in solid tumours: revised RECIST guideline (version 1.1)
Eisenhauer, E. A., Therasse, P., Bogaerts, J., Schwartz, L. H., Sargent, D., Ford, R., Dancey, J., Arbuck, S., Gwyther, S., Mooney, M., et al. (2009) · European Journal of Cancer · doi:10.1016/j.ejca.2008.10.026 · Cited by 29,534
Swisher, E. M., Lin, K. K., Oza, A. M., Scott, C. L., Giordano, H., Sun, J., Konecny, G. E., Coleman, R. L., Tinker, A. V., O'Malley, D. M., et al. (2017) · The Lancet Oncology · doi:10.1016/s1470-2045(16)30559-9 · Cited by 1,196
Self-citationWatkins, J. A., Irshad, S., Grigoriadis, A., & Tutt, A. N. (2014) · Breast Cancer Research · doi:10.1186/bcr3670 · Cited by 327
Cited by
Maintenance Olaparib in Patients with Newly Diagnosed Advanced Ovarian Cancer
Moore, K., Colombo, N., Scambia, G., Kim, B.-G., Oaknin, A., Friedlander, M., Lisyanskaya, A., Floquet, A., Leary, A., Sonke, G. S., et al. (2018) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa1810858 · Cited by 2,870
Self-citationLheureux, S., Gourley, C., Vergote, I., & Oza, A. M. (2019) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(18)32552-2 · Cited by 1,919
Self-citationState-of-the-art strategies for targeting the DNA damage response in cancer
Pilié, P. G., Tang, C., Mills, G. B., & Yap, T. A. (2019) · Nature Reviews Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1038/s41571-018-0114-z · Cited by 1,189
Colombo, N., Sessa, C., du Bois, A., Ledermann, J., McCluggage, W. G., McNeish, I., Morice, P., Pignata, S., Ray-Coquard, I., Vergote, I., et al. (2019) · Annals of Oncology · doi:10.1093/annonc/mdz062 · Cited by 1,197
Self-citationA decade of clinical development of PARP inhibitors in perspective
Mateo, J., Lord, C. J., Serra, V., Tutt, A., Balmaña, J., Castroviejo-Bermejo, M., Cruz, C., Oaknin, A., Kaye, S. B., & de Bono, J. S. (2019) · Annals of Oncology · doi:10.1093/annonc/mdz192 · Cited by 743
“The ARIEL3 phase III trial evaluated rucaparib as maintenance treatment following platinum-based therapy in recurrent high-grade ovarian cancer, randomizing 564 women to rucaparib versus placebo (2 : 1) [31].”
MethodSelf-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Coleman, R. L., Oza, A. M., Lorusso, D., Aghajanian, C., Oaknin, A., Dean, A., Colombo, N., Weberpals, J. I., Clamp, A., Scambia, G., Leary, A., Holloway, R. W., Gancedo, M. A., Fong, P. C., Goh, J. C., O'Malley, D. M., Armstrong, D. K., Garcia-Donas, J., Swisher, E. M., Floquet, A., Konecny, G. E., McNeish, I. A., Scott, C. L., Cameron, T., Maloney, L., Isaacson, J., Goble, S., Grace, C., Harding, T. C., Raponi, M., Sun, J., Lin, K. K., Giordano, H., Ledermann, J. A., Buck, M., Dean, A., Friedlander, M. L., Goh, J. C., Harnett, P., Kichenadasse, G., Scott, C. L., Denys, H., Dirix, L., Vergote, I., Elit, L., Ghatage, P., Oza, A. M., Plante, M., Provencher, D., Weberpals, J. I., Welch, S., Floquet, A., Gladieff, L., Joly, F., Leary, A., Lortholary, A., Lotz, J., Medioni, J., Tredan, O., You, B., El-Balat, A., Hänle, C., Krabisch, P., Neunhöffer, T., Pölcher, M., Wimberger, P., Amit, A., Kovel, S., Leviov, M., Safra, T., Shapira-Frommer, R., Stemmer, S., Bologna, A., Colombo, N., Lorusso, D., Pignata, S., Sabbatini, R. F., Scambia, G., Tamberi, S., Zamagni, C., Fong, P. C., O'Donnell, A., Gancedo, M. A., Herraez, A. C., Garcia-Donas, J., Guerra, E. M., Oaknin, A., Palacio, I., Romero, I., Sanchez, A., Banerjee, S. N., Clamp, A., Drew, Y., Gabra, H. G., Jackson, D., Ledermann, J. A., McNeish, I. A., Parkinson, C., Powell, M., Aghajanian, C., Armstrong, D. K., Birrer, M. J., Buss, M. K., Chambers, S. K., Chen, L.-M., Coleman, R. L., Holloway, R. W., Konecny, G. E., Ma, L., Morgan, M. A., Morris, R. T., Mutch, D. G., O'Malley, D. M., Slomovitz, B. M., Swisher, E. M., Vanderkwaak, T., & Vulfovich, M.
- Venue
- The Lancet
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2017-10
- Volume
- 390
- Issue
- 10106
- Pages
- 1949-1961
- ISSN
- 0099-5355 (ISSN-L)
- 0140-6736
- OpenAlex
- W2754327139
- Cited by
- 1,693
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 58.92
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Rucaparib maintenance treatment for recurrent ovarian carcinoma after response to platinum therapy (ARIEL3): a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/s0140-6736(17)32440-6
- The paper
- Coleman, R. L., Oza, A. M., Lorusso, D., Aghajanian, C., Oaknin, A., Dean, A., Colombo, N., Weberpals, J. I., Clamp, A., Scambia, G., Leary, A., Holloway, R. W., Gancedo, M. A., Fong, P. C., Goh, J. C., O'Malley, D. M., Armstrong, D. K., Garcia-Donas, J., Swisher, E. M., . . . Vulfovich, M. (2017). Rucaparib maintenance treatment for recurrent ovarian carcinoma after response to platinum therapy (ARIEL3): a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial. The Lancet. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0140-6736(17)32440-6
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.